Re-stamping. When is it kosher?





TIA for settling my confusion, or at least for what may prove to be an interesting debate...
Thats what separates matching and non matching.
The way the first purchaser bought it out the door the first day is it, not 3 weeks down the road and he blows up the engine and GM replaces it, it is now non-numbers matching.
You have only 1 set of original parents, no matter how good or bad they are.
The problem comes when the car is being offered for sale. Does the owner tell the truth and take an X % loss in price because it's a restamp? How about the next time it's sold? Which seller eventually 'forgets' that the car is a restamp and it gets sold as an original?
(I have no idea why I posted this)
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Re-stamping a closely configured and date casted engine as a replacement to a Corvettes missing original engine, in my opinion only has one reason for doing so....resale value.
I would never do it.
Last edited by early shark; Nov 16, 2007 at 11:03 AM.
I lost both, BUT.... I fortunately had a scan of each so I knew what they looked like.
So I went to print them back out. Now I have a "restamped" $5 and $100 and they aren't counterfeit because NCRS says so.
----
OR
I decide "why print a $5 when I can print a $100?" So I print both as $100, and now one is real and the other counterfeit.
But can you tell which is which?
----
Somehow, I grew up being taught, if it ain't real, it ain't real. No amount of paint, polish, etc. is going to change that. But since NCRS went down this path about 10 years ago, they have let the genie out of the bottle and there is no hopes of it ever returning ever. This is possibly the worse thing NCRS could have ever done for the hobby.
The only way I can ever see it being rectified is to add condition points to restamps, so that you can get partial credit for a stamp being there, regardless of whether it is perfect enough to fool the judges.
That way, the amateur restorer gets his partial credit, the better restorer gets a bit more, and the pro with the original GM stamps gets the most. But it eliminates the Pass/Fail mentality now where the $50,000 restoration shop gets the pass and everyone else gets the fail.
By doing this, "numbers matching" will simply mean that - they match. Any and all thoughts of them being original will be gone and all that garbage that "original" carries will be gone. Cars will once again be judged as cars, prices will be based on quality, and some sort of sanity may return to Corvettes.
Will never happen, though.
They judge cars that "Appear" as original. The paint must look like it did when it was new. The driveshaft must look like it did when new. BUT the cylinder case stamping is somewhat different and subject to a lot of debate. Hot topic as people with original stamps do not want to refinish that part of the car. Legal issues, provenance, monetary value, etc. The concept of restoration is to refinish everything to look like new but how can you address this hot potato? NCRS gives points for an original stamping BUT not much. That way you can enjoy the sport but not become ailenated if you choose not to restamp. NCRS does not want to encourage you or discourage you from restamping either way. They want participation, not division. Within NCRS there are LOTS of people who have strong feelings about this. I would guess it probably depends a lot on wheather you have an original stamp on your Vette or not.
Consider this crazy idea - an original broached stamp pad with years worth of corrosion/deterioration does not appear restored "As Original" BUT a well done re-stamped pad might look more original because it is fresh and not rusty. -HA! What do you say to that?!?!
JMO.
-Mark.
Not an NCRS member now. Probably never will be. This is part of the reason why.
As stated many times before, IF the judges find a discrepancy with
1) the machine code
2) the VIN deriviative
3) the pad pad surface
EACH will get a complete deduct.
IF a restamp 'gets past' the judges, it means simply that it was not identified as a restamp. Congratulations, you've fooled the judges!!! (no, you've only fooled yourself)
Where does this myth come from that a judge will 'accept' a stamp pad even if he knows that it's a restamp?
And once again the total value of all three items above is 88 points- less than 2% of the total judging score and roughly the same as a couple of burned out light bulbs and an incorrect cigarette lighter.
Last edited by ...Roger...; Nov 16, 2007 at 12:50 PM.
Period.
Personally, I think it's cooler to have a non-original built up motor in a car anyway. Why not improve what the factory put in and take it one step further.
I don't really even get the whole "original" thing. Ya, it's cool to see an old car, but when people get so crazy as to spend hundreds of dollars on correct fan belts, you have to ask yourself, "And so I have the correct fan belts. Now what. What has that really accomplished me. So I get a few more points."
When you get to the point where you are too terrified to drive your investment, ahem, excuse me, car, is it really that fun anymore? Why did you buy the car in the first place? I doubt it was so it could sit in a climate controlled bubble 360 days of the year, and spend the rest on a trailor and on some big front yard that's more like a car yard sale where the buyers name the prices.
Real cars are driven. If it breaks, fix it and make it better than it was.
But then again, that's a whole other can of worms there.
My .02














