Engine stamping
Drifting
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 5
From: Upstate South Carolina
It's hard to tell in the picture. I can't really see broach marks but I'm far from an expert on that subject. The 0 in the V0225CTU is slightly different from both 70 LT-1s that I have owned, but I think they often used 0s and Os interchangeably. The inconsistency that I see is the VIN derivative should start 70S4 not 10S4. Both 70s I owned started 70 for the year and according to NCRS Tech Man, all should. Mistakes were often made on the line, but that seems like a pretty big one to me. What is the body build date? Based on the VIN, that would be one of the last CTU LT-1s built. What else do you know about the car?
Last edited by mstanton; Jan 25, 2008 at 08:08 AM. Reason: edit
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 11
From: Grafton MA
the car is on ebay now and was listed one time before not to long ago. i don't know if it's legal to post links to ebay but I'm pretty sure it's the only '70 LT-1 up right now. The first time up for auction the this was the picture of the pad that was provided.
I don't know it was chrome plated or if he did some weird effect in photoshop or something in an attempt to get it to show up better? Either way it just doesn't seem right to me. I don't see the bounce on the "1" in this picture either.
auction numbers are
290194433159
and
290201385024
I don't know it was chrome plated or if he did some weird effect in photoshop or something in an attempt to get it to show up better? Either way it just doesn't seem right to me. I don't see the bounce on the "1" in this picture either.
auction numbers are
290194433159
and
290201385024
Last edited by pwsusi; Jan 25, 2008 at 02:31 PM.
Drifting
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 157
From: Miami, FL
Paul,
To me, this may be a legit car, and may be the right engine, but for sure it has been restamped. Some of the dates are questionable. The build date on my '70 is 3/18 with the engine 3/05. Why it would be such a large time gap on this one I would not have a clue. I suppose it could have gone back for rework but in my mind this one was stamped at least once, maybe twice.
Greg
To me, this may be a legit car, and may be the right engine, but for sure it has been restamped. Some of the dates are questionable. The build date on my '70 is 3/18 with the engine 3/05. Why it would be such a large time gap on this one I would not have a clue. I suppose it could have gone back for rework but in my mind this one was stamped at least once, maybe twice.
Greg
Last edited by gccch; Jan 25, 2008 at 02:45 PM.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Drifting
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 5
From: Upstate South Carolina
Both of the pictures with obvious broach marks are big blocks. I believe that broach marks stand out clearer on big blocks, especially in pictures. The time gap between the engine and car build is a little long but I don't think so long that it should be a red flag by itself. At that time the last of the CTU engines were being used and that may explain the gap. Again, I think the biggest thing that needs to be explained is why the VIN starts with 1 vice 7.
Last edited by mstanton; Jan 25, 2008 at 08:18 PM. Reason: Can't type or spell
Team Owner
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 37,637
Likes: 3,118
From: Crossville TN
Severity of "broach marks" is a function of how old the broach bar is. After so many passes, those bars go back for sharpening. After sharpening, they generate a smoother appearance...then wear till the marks get pretty obvious. Don't expect the same appearance on every engine...it doesn't happen that way.
Team Owner
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 37,637
Likes: 3,118
From: Crossville TN
Just a guess... but I would bet that anyone trying to make it appear original would know which way to stamp the block. It's more likely that some "newbie" in the machine repair ranks installed the stamping equipment upside down. Now that you have mentioned it, I would imagine that others [with similar condition] will be commenting about that.
Drifting
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 5
From: Upstate South Carolina
Just a guess... but I would bet that anyone trying to make it appear original would know which way to stamp the block. It's more likely that some "newbie" in the machine repair ranks installed the stamping equipment upside down. Now that you have mentioned it, I would imagine that others [with similar condition] will be commenting about that.
Maybe never even noticed in the factory.
Le Mans Master
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,800
Likes: 1,942
From: LONG ISLAND
2025 C3 ('68-'73) of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2024 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
2023 C3 of the Year Finalist - Unmodified
Race Director
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 10,643
Likes: 8
From: Foxfield CO 1970 Convertible
OK - something is not right with pwsusi's head number. That pad stamp should be identical to all but the first four digits of the vin number. The first two digits should be 71 because it's a coupe (7) made in 1971 (1). I hate to say it, but it looks double stamped in the 1 area. The suffix of CTU is correct for an LT1. Maybe it's from a different year...
Here's the what the code from a vin should look like...
1 - Chevrolet (Line)
94 - Corvette (Model)
37 - Coupe (Body style)
1 - 1971 (Year)
S - St. Louis (plant)
4 - can't remember what this was
08532 - manufacturing sequence number (serial number)
Decode Link
1970 used the same engine coding as 1971. For comparison, here's my stamp for 1970 convertible...
Here's the what the code from a vin should look like...
1 - Chevrolet (Line)
94 - Corvette (Model)
37 - Coupe (Body style)
1 - 1971 (Year)
S - St. Louis (plant)
4 - can't remember what this was
08532 - manufacturing sequence number (serial number)
Decode Link
1970 used the same engine coding as 1971. For comparison, here's my stamp for 1970 convertible...
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 793
Likes: 11
From: Grafton MA
Thanks Z Man. This was original picture was actually from '70 LT-1 coupe; not a '71. So the first digit alone (1) is a red flag...should start with "70" like yours. I passed on the car.
Drifting
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 5
From: Upstate South Carolina
70 and 71 VIN engine codes were not the same. 70s were as depicted above, 70S4XXXXX. Early 71s used te same format, 71S1XXXXX. Most 71s were as follows, C11S1XXXXX. The upside down VIN should be a 72, 12S5XXXXX.
