Gas prices
If demand had remained high when the prices were high, then the price of a gallon of gas would have come down right along side with the price of a barrel, but since demand was lower it took longer.
Because we don't need to buy as many barrels to meet our demand, we didn't need to bid as much to get the quantity we needed. You're right that I didn't think it would go below $3 again though - I figured that was the bottom because around the $3 mark consumption was relatively the same. Everyone was complaining about it, but no one was actually changing their driving habits. At $4 people stopped driving so much. Many companies actually changed their policies to assist in this, offering to let their employees work 10 hour days for 4 days a week instead of the traditional 8 hour days 5 days a week, eliminating a whole day's worth of driving. The credit crunch changed this, because it forced the speculators out of the market - that wasn't expected, although I can't say I'm complaining. Sometimes it's good to be wrong.

It has nothing to do with who is President. Just like how the credit crunch has nothing to do with the President, the status of GM has nothing to do with the President, and housing prices have nothing to do with the President. It's nice to have a scapegoat and be able to say "It's all THAT guy's fault!" but it doesn't make it accurate or true. The sooner you and other Americans who are equally uninformed on this subject realize this and pay attention to the actual causes of economic situations, the sooner we'll stop putting morons in office who believe the same thing. You see, the problem with people who think the President has anything to do with ANY of the stuff mentioned above or anywhere in this thread is that if you believe the President is to blame, then you believe the President can also fix the problem, and you'll elect any idiot who comes along and says he can.
The President has nothing to do with the price of oil, gas, food, credit, etc. unless he's taxing them. And in which case, the prices of those things go up, not down. We're already paying 40 something cents a gallon due to taxes (18 cents is the Federal tax portion). That means when you take away Uncle Sam's cut, gas is actually only $1.39 a gallon... your buddy Obama wants to raise the gas tax though. And now that prices are falling, he'll get away with it.
By the way, do you know what Obama's solution is for GM? It's not to help them reduce their costs by kicking out the unions. It's to make Toyota and Honda's costs more expensive by forcing them to let the unions in. That's the twisted logic of the left. Congratulations, I hope you're happy with your choice.
Last edited by Ron R; Dec 1, 2008 at 09:59 AM.
If the price takes 10 days to increase to reflect the rising cost of oil but it takes 20 days for it to come down, did you bother to ask "why?" or did you just accept that lame explanation? What's the mechanism that causes this mysterious delay on the down side? Of course people in the business would say that. It's like the falacious argument that the gasoline in the tanks in the ground was purchased at higher prices so it has to be used up before the lower raw material prices can be expressed. That's bull too. The gasoline in the tanks was there when the prices were run up. Didn't they make offsetting profits on the favorable side when they repriced at the pump?
There's lots of shell games that the manufacturers, dealers and taxers will run, but none of them hold much water on close inspection.
Because we don't need to buy as many barrels to meet our demand, we didn't need to bid as much to get the quantity we needed. You're right that I didn't think it would go below $3 again though - I figured that was the bottom because around the $3 mark consumption was relatively the same. Everyone was complaining about it, but no one was actually changing their driving habits. At $4 people stopped driving so much. Many companies actually changed their policies to assist in this, offering to let their employees work 10 hour days for 4 days a week instead of the traditional 8 hour days 5 days a week, eliminating a whole day's worth of driving. The credit crunch changed this, because it forced the speculators out of the market - that wasn't expected, although I can't say I'm complaining. Sometimes it's good to be wrong.

It has nothing to do with who is President. Just like how the credit crunch has nothing to do with the President, the status of GM has nothing to do with the President, and housing prices have nothing to do with the President. It's nice to have a scapegoat and be able to say "It's all THAT guy's fault!" but it doesn't make it accurate or true. The sooner you and other Americans who are equally uninformed on this subject realize this and pay attention to the actual causes of economic situations, the sooner we'll stop putting morons in office who believe the same thing. You see, the problem with people who think the President has anything to do with ANY of the stuff mentioned above or anywhere in this thread is that if you believe the President is to blame, then you believe the President can also fix the problem, and you'll elect any idiot who comes along and says he can.
The President has nothing to do with the price of oil, gas, food, credit, etc. unless he's taxing them. And in which case, the prices of those things go up, not down. We're already paying 40 something cents a gallon due to taxes (18 cents is the Federal tax portion). That means when you take away Uncle Sam's cut, gas is actually only $1.39 a gallon... your buddy Obama wants to raise the gas tax though. And now that prices are falling, he'll get away with it.
By the way, do you know what Obama's solution is for GM? It's not to help them reduce their costs by kicking out the unions. It's to make Toyota and Honda's costs more expensive by forcing them to let the unions in. That's the twisted logic of the left. Congratulations, I hope you're happy with your choice.
As far as my choice who the next Pesident is, I did not care for either so I did not vote. Let me guess, you wanted McCain ?? He lost so I guess everybody else was wrong in their choice?? Except you, you were right but the majority got it wrong.
I still say, take the Oil Man who only cared for himself out of office and prices drop. Sure they drop every fall but they dropped almost $3 a gallon. Remember, YOU said it was impossible for gas to ever get that low again........
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
If the price takes 10 days to increase to reflect the rising cost of oil but it takes 20 days for it to come down, did you bother to ask "why?" or did you just accept that lame explanation? What's the mechanism that causes this mysterious delay on the down side? Of course people in the business would say that. It's like the falacious argument that the gasoline in the tanks in the ground was purchased at higher prices so it has to be used up before the lower raw material prices can be expressed. That's bull too. The gasoline in the tanks was there when the prices were run up. Didn't they make offsetting profits on the favorable side when they repriced at the pump?
There's lots of shell games that the manufacturers, dealers and taxers will run, but none of them hold much water on close inspection.
So at $50, the price of a gallon of gasoline is $1.43 pre-tax/pre-profit ... so tell me, where is the shell game? The numbers all match up.
As for the delay between crude and pump, it's like this... you're a gas station owner. If you're a small station you may have a 2,000 gallon tank in the ground. A mid to large station would have a 10,000 gallon tank in the ground. If the price of oil jumps so does your cost to refill your tank in the ground. If you, the gas station owner, are paying $2.50 a gallon today then you expect to pay about $25,000 to fill that tank. But as the price rises, you realize that your next fill is going to be at $3.00 a gallon and you're going to have to cough up an extra $5,000. Then the price rises to $3.25 and you have to spend $32,500. And this is WEEKLY mind you, so you have to have a ton of cash on hand to be able to do this, because they sure aren't going to just drop the gas off and not get paid for it, especially at these prices.
So even though the gas in the ground was purchased at a cheaper rate, you raise your prices up to be consistent with the higher price, because you need to make that extra profit now in order to have the money to pay for the next refueling. So in spite of the fact that you're charging more for gas you bought at a discounted rate, you're not actually seeing a profit here because you need that money to buy the next tank of fuel. And that one was going up too, at least that's how it was for the last 3 years or so. Your profits remain relatively the same percentage they've always been, the gap in pricing just keeps getting absorbed by the rising costs.
Then the price starts coming down - something which unless you were running a gas station in the 80's has probably never happened to you before. However you paid a huge sum for the gas in the tank. You paid $40,000 for the gas in the ground - are you honestly going to tell me you're going to sell that gas for half that? You can't stay in business that way. You'll reduce your price slowly to soften the impact, and bring the price down next time you refuel. It's not the oil companies that are doing this, the majority of the gas stations are independently owned.
It's not a perfect world, man. That doesn't mean everyone is gouging.
I hope prices stays this way, but I figure right before summer it will be back up again...
By the way, do you know what Obama's solution is for GM? It's not to help them reduce their costs by kicking out the unions. It's to make Toyota and Honda's costs more expensive by forcing them to let the unions in. That's the twisted logic of the left. Congratulations, I hope you're happy with your choice.
Happy? I'm ecstatic. Stick it to the Asian interlopers. If the big 3 go Chapter 11, only Toyota and Honda will be stuck with paying union benefits. Either way, they'll join the chorus of support for universal health care that will slash their worker and retiree obligations.
As for the gas tax rise, we'll need it to pay those millions of workers who will rebuild America's long-neglected infrastructure.
As for the gas tax rise, we'll need it to pay those millions of workers who will rebuild America's long-neglected infrastructure.
so at $50, the price of a gallon of gasoline is $1.43 pre-tax/pre-profit ... So tell me, where is the shell game? The numbers all match up.
As for the delay between crude and pump, it's like this... You're a gas station owner. If you're a small station you may have a 2,000 gallon tank in the ground. A mid to large station would have a 10,000 gallon tank in the ground. If the price of oil jumps so does your cost to refill your tank in the ground. If you, the gas station owner, are paying $2.50 a gallon today then you expect to pay about $25,000 to fill that tank. But as the price rises, you realize that your next fill is going to be at $3.00 a gallon and you're going to have to cough up an extra $5,000. Then the price rises to $3.25 and you have to spend $32,500. And this is weekly mind you, so you have to have a ton of cash on hand to be able to do this, because they sure aren't going to just drop the gas off and not get paid for it, especially at these prices.
So even though the gas in the ground was purchased at a cheaper rate, you raise your prices up to be consistent with the higher price, because you need to make that extra profit now in order to have the money to pay for the next refueling. So in spite of the fact that you're charging more for gas you bought at a discounted rate, you're not actually seeing a profit here because you need that money to buy the next tank of fuel. And that one was going up too, at least that's how it was for the last 3 years or so. Your profits remain relatively the same percentage they've always been, the gap in pricing just keeps getting absorbed by the rising costs.
Then the price starts coming down - something which unless you were running a gas station in the 80's has probably never happened to you before. However you paid a huge sum for the gas in the tank. You paid $40,000 for the gas in the ground - are you honestly going to tell me you're going to sell that gas for half that? You can't stay in business that way. You'll reduce your price slowly to soften the impact, and bring the price down next time you refuel. It's not the oil companies that are doing this, the majority of the gas stations are independently owned.
It's not a perfect world, man. That doesn't mean everyone is gouging.
As for the gas tax rise, we'll need it to pay those millions of workers who will rebuild America's long-neglected infrastructure.

Oh, almost forgot about the topic, gas here is between $1.99 and $2.05 !

















