Timing Issue...
Last edited by kclarry; Feb 16, 2009 at 12:51 PM. Reason: posting in tech
Here is a link to a good paper on timimg:
http://www.lbfun.com/warehouse/tech_...t%20Timing.pdf
Shoot for 36 degrees of mechanical advance, all in by 2500 rpm and another 16 of vacuum.
I was looking for performance instead of stock...
I just checked the timing and it was around 10 degrees at idle.
Read Lars' paper that I linked to above. You don't drive at idle so why set your advance at idle. I have about 16 degrees at idle and 36 all in by 2500. Runs great.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
With all due respect, I have to disagree.
Total timing = initial timing + centrifugal (mechanical) advance. Vacuum advance does not factor into total timing since it is only in effect when vacuum is high and load is low.
Under WOT, vacuum goes to zero and so does vacuum advance and you have your 36 degrees of total timing. You only get the 52 degrees of timing under light load when the engine can tolerate more advance.
I stand by my recommendations above. I have used those setting for over 5 years with no problems. I have a ZZ4 clone that pulls hard to 6000 rpm, gets 20 mpg and has no issues with detonation and pinging.
For the OP, read this thread for more info:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c3-t...long-post.html
Another source of information:
http://rockridgefarm.com/vettdoc/Timing_101.pdf
Last edited by SteveG75; Feb 17, 2009 at 07:58 PM.
With all due respect, I have to disagree.
Total timing = initial timing + centrifugal (mechanical) advance. Vacuum advance does not factor into total timing since it is only in effect when vacuum is high and load is low.
Under WOT, vacuum goes to zero and so does vacuum advance and you have your 36 degrees of total timing. You only get the 52 degrees of timing under light load when the engine can tolerate more advance.
I stand by my recommendations above. I have used those setting for over 5 years with no problems. I have a ZZ4 clone that pulls hard to 6000 rpm, gets 20 mpg and has no issues with detonation and pinging.
For the OP, read this thread for more info:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c3-t...long-post.html
Another source of information:
http://rockridgefarm.com/vettdoc/Timing_101.pdf
I will trust the judgment of two former GM engineers over random internet folks.
and the engineer argument is lame, they didnt invent mech. or vac advance. this was created long ago. ive got engineers at my job who cant tie their own shoes
and the engineer argument is lame, they didnt invent mech. or vac advance. this was created long ago. ive got engineers at my job who cant tie their own shoes
I set my timing as follows:
1. Disconnect and plug vacuum advance.
2. Set total timing (initial + centrifugal advance) at 36 degrees at 2500 rpm. My curve is set to that all centrigugal advance is in by 2500 rpm.
3. Initial advance is then about 18 degrees or so.
4. Reconnect vacuum advance to manifold vacuum (not ported).
5. Drive and enjoy.
You initially said that total advance includes mechanical and vacuum advance and now you say that my quote not to add vacuum advance is what you meant.

Questions, on your 383:
What is your initial advance?
What is your centrifugal advance curve? What rpm is it all in by?
Are you using vacuum advance?
If so, how many degrees of advance does the vacuum can add and at what vacuum setting?
Ported or manifold vacuum?
Just read the info here as well:
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c3-t...ng-post-7.html
Very entertaining.

In that thread, you said:
Note, they say total timing change is 34 degrees NOT total timing. So, if you run 12 degrees initial timing, you could have up to 46 degrees total timing by your own measure.
Just because MSD limits you to 9 degrees of vacuum advance, doesn't mean that you cannot run more.
Last edited by SteveG75; Feb 17, 2009 at 09:10 PM.














