When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
After all, we Easton folks have to stick together. I have not heard much good about the Crossfire engine but the 78's are very nice. Does your dad like the newer style window in the back versus the straight window?
I love my 77's and didn't buy a 78 because of the rear window set up. Personal choice really. Good luck with the decision.
David
77Sleeper
Well he is going to check each out out, and drive them then see what he feels is better.
He loves the late styled c3, in silver with red interior.
I have a red c5 with black/grey interior and love that combo!
I'm really looking which one will be more reliable, better on gas, and last him. He doesn't mind small tinkering but doesn't want anything too major to fix.
Am I correct on the one being a 3 speed auto vs 4 speed auto?
I think the 82 might be a little better equipped as a driver.
Sounds like people either love or hate the crossfire on the '82's.
The '82 would be a better highway cruiser with the 4 speed auto, but those are roads I avoid when out in the Vette.
Generally the 80-82 body style has commanded stronger prices than the 78-79. Many people don't like the Crossfire or the computer on 82's. The Crossfire will run great, but it's getting harder to find parts for, or to find someone familiar with it to work on it. The computer isn't that big a deal to me. Unlike todays cars, the 82 computer is pretty basic and doesn't really control a whole lot of the car's operations. The 82 is a more refined car with a few more available options, not available in 78 (power mirrors, locks and driver seat). The 82 also has the better "Pace Car" style seats and the better riding fiberglass rear spring. Unless the 78 is an L-82, the performance will be pretty close, while the 82 may get slightly better mileage. Overall the 82 is a more developed, more refined, more comfortable car, and depending on the options, a potentially better equiped car.
Whether you prefer the spoilered 80-82 body or the 78-79 body, that's strickly a personal preference. If your not afraid of the Crossfire injection, or the computer, I think you'll find the 82 to be a potentially better car. That's my take on it, for what it's worth.
Generally the 80-82 body style has commanded stronger prices than the 78-79. Many people don't like the Crossfire or the computer on 82's. The Crossfire will run great, but it's getting harder to find parts for, or to find someone familiar with it to work on it. The computer isn't that big a deal to me. Unlike todays cars, the 82 computer is pretty basic and doesn't really control a whole lot of the car's operations. The 82 is a more refined car with a few more available options, not available in 78 (power mirrors, locks and driver seat). The 82 also has the better "Pace Car" style seats and the better riding fiberglass rear spring. Unless the 78 is an L-82, the performance will be pretty close, while the 82 may get slightly better mileage. Overall the 82 is a more developed, more refined, more comfortable car, and depending on the options, a potentially better equiped car.
Whether you prefer the spoilered 80-82 body or the 78-79 body, that's strickly a personal preference. If your not afraid of the Crossfire injection, or the computer, I think you'll find the 82 to be a potentially better car. That's my take on it, for what it's worth.
he has said it pretty well .if your not going to change alot ,go with the 82 its a great driver .if you want to hot rod the 78 is easy .i like the better ride from the 82.the cross-fire is better than what you have heard .
From: Downtown Annapolis, MD. The Future is where we all have to live. Let's not screw it up.
St. Jude Donor '08-'09-'10-'11
Without pics I'm hesitant to give actual advise other than the generalities others have stated above.
You're going to have to get past that prickly feeling and tell us the prices of each. It's clearly a Buyer's market.
Check the usual rust issues, and be sure one or both aren't 150k mile cars. Little things can be give-aways. One thing I look for on supposed low mileage cars is rotors still riveted to the hubs, and pedal pads that show 50k miles of wear. Should also be Numbers Matching.
Likewise the interiors should be showing some wear, driver side more so than the passenger side if they're original. I'm always suspect of new seat covers and carpet on a car purported to be low mileage.
I wouldn't let the twin throttle-body Crossfire scare you away all by itself. When they're working right, they pull pretty good considering what was available at the time, but if you just want a carb with no computer, pre '81 is where to start looking.
My gut feeling is that if they were identical quality cars overall with similar options, I'd go with the '82 for a driver.
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
I love my '78 SA, but wouldn't consider a run of 46,776 (15,283 Silver Anniversaries, 6,502 Pace Cars among them) as being anything resembling rare or especially "collectible" when compared to any other particular year of the shark generation. Every C3 year has it's loyal fans, each with their own reasoning. Whichever one you simply like the most, IMHO you won't be making a mistake by choosing one year over the other as long as the decision is sound otherwise.
I'm really looking which one will be more reliable, better on gas, and last him. He doesn't mind small tinkering but doesn't want anything too major to fix.
This might be your key point. I personally like the look of the '82 better, both exterior and interior. Seats a ton better. Nose and tail look, too. It is the end of the model run, and therefore the most refined. It's probably more optioned than the '78. However, that Crossfire might cause him fits.
It is true there are people who can make them run right, but it's simply a tougher task than dealing with a '78 engine. That's just a fact.
All '78s are "collector editions" in name only, and have zero value bump for it. '82 might be easier to get a couple more dollars for at resale time. I like everything about the '82 better except the Crossfire.
4 speed auto, better MPG
FI TB, that can be upgraded easy to other units
computer tuning via ALDL cable and free software
Lighter weight
Rear compsite mono leaf spring, better ride and better handling
Spoilers front and rear.. so cool!!!
Power driver seat
front turn signals also house a very nice white curb light to illuminate the turn when turning.
Update seats with fiberglass housing
....
Either way though he can't go wrong..
Buy the best one.
All in all, the '82. It is a more flexible car. I love the body style of the 82 and the 4 speed will be more usable. I think of all the long cruises I could take with the overdrive. Perfect for the "old man."