When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I use the Ignitor on my 68 L36 to trigger the MSD box. I use the Ignitor 2 (I think) and coil on my verrry original 65 442. I am thinking of buying a 64 to 67 El Camino. If I do, I will get another Pertronix setup.
Did it make a difference? Well, there is nothing wrong with points. I believe it smoothed out the idle somewhat, but that could be due to the age of the points. I don't think there are any more cars built with points.
Others will chime in with their experiences...
Last edited by Jeff_Keryk; May 19, 2009 at 03:00 PM.
I was looking on the purtronix web site and noticed there are 2 types of the igniter II available for a V8. One is for a dual point the other is standard. How can I tell if I have dual point or not. I have a 350.
No upgraded ignition or conversion will make a difference in performance if that's what you're asking. The early Pertronics units had a horrible reliability record, the latest ones seem to be OK.
The only thing they achieve is eliminating occasional adjustment or replacements of the points. I doubt very much if you have dual points in your existing distributor.
I guess I am the exception to the rule here I built a 390 Ford to put in my 65 pickup and put a Pertronix in it 10 years ago and it is still going strong. No more setting points to trouble starting. I am going to put one in my wifes 72 Vette soon.
No upgraded ignition or conversion will make a difference in performance if that's what you're asking. The early Pertronics units had a horrible reliability record, the latest ones seem to be OK.
The only thing they achieve is eliminating occasional adjustment or replacements of the points. I doubt very much if you have dual points in your existing distributor.
I've had Ignitors installed in two 69 Mustangs since 1995 and 1998 respectively. I realize that this is anecdotal, but mine have been as dependable as can be in that 14 year and 11 year duration. Most of the failures that I am aware of have been experienced with the Ignitor II units and not the early Ignitor I. They also provided both cars with a much better throttle response. If maintaining a breaker points based ignition system were so trivial, manufacturers wouldn't have gone electronic a couple of decades ago. Have you ever used Pertronix Ignitor yourself? What are your comments about horrible reliability based on?
I've had good luck with the pertronix units. My feeling is if the distributor is in good condition you wont see any difference between the pertronix and points. But if the distributor has some wear and allows the dwell to vary the pertronix unit will forgive this and the engine will run better. I've experimented a little by taking a car that that has worn dist bushings and allows the dwell to vary and was breaking up around 4000 and installed the pertronix and the car would then run on up to higher rpm. Rebuilt the dist at a later date and reinstalled the points. This could be one reason some feel a difference in performance.
I "was" able to make a 54 start better by installing a pertronix and using an extra capacitor so the battery voltage to the dist didnt fall to a critical level.
My 2 cents.... With points, you can tell when the ignition system is "going south" way before it will leave you stranded; with electronic ignition systems, when they go, the car's dead.
My 2 cents.... With points, you can tell when the ignition system is "going south" way before it will leave you stranded; with electronic ignition systems, when they go, the car's dead.
I keep a set of old points and condenser in the glove box just in case, if the pertronix dies it is really easy to change back to the points, the boxes are about to crumble they have been in there so long.
I put the ignitor 2 1 year ago... only thing I set the gap wrongly and the pick up ring rubbed the module...appart from that car runs fine. I corrected the gap last week when replacing the dizzy main shaft...now it runs better...hahah stupid amateur mechanic me....
yeap
I though so once but I was looking to keep the tach drive... and new dissy with tach were in the 300 and up but then I saw ones in around 150 but that was after I went petronix.. and as I had that well just decided to rebuilt.. anyway the rebuilt ended up ok...car runs strong up to 140mph with no problem....is that ok???
I run the Ignitor kit in five cars. No problems, ever.
I disagree that there wouldn't be a performance difference between stock points set-up and the Ignitor kit.
First, I can run a full 12v to the Ignitor FlameThrower coil and that has to mean a better spark to the plugs. Stock coils and points ran on 6-9v to prevent the points from frying.
Secondly, single points set-ups weren't much good much past 5500 RPM. With the Ignitor kit, I often rev my two SB cars to 6500+ without ever missing a beat.
And the best part is, everything looks completely stock.
FWIW
Last edited by 73, Dark Blue 454; May 22, 2009 at 06:44 PM.
No upgraded ignition or conversion will make a difference in performance if that's what you're asking. The early Pertronics units had a horrible reliability record, the latest ones seem to be OK.
The only thing they achieve is eliminating occasional adjustment or replacements of the points. I doubt very much if you have dual points in your existing distributor.
OK, I've been using them since 1980 when they were introduced by the Per-Lux lighting corporation and only had 1 issue due to my fault of not properly checking clearances after installing a unit ( I caused a high RPM miss due to rivets losening when the magnet wheel rubbed the pick-up unit when I did'nt properly set clearances.). I run them on most of my old Chevy's and Ford's with no roadside strandings EVER! I guess they don't like the cold enviroments of the Great White North or you and your buddies the McKenzy brothers did the install while downing too many Molsens (EH? Hoser?)
OK, I've been using them since 1980 when they were introduced by the Per-Lux lighting corporation and only had 1 issue due to my fault of not properly checking clearances after installing a unit ( I caused a high RPM miss due to rivets losening when the magnet wheel rubbed the pick-up unit when I did'nt properly set clearances.). I run them on most of my old Chevy's and Ford's with no roadside strandings EVER! I guess they don't like the cold enviroments of the Great White North or you and your buddies the McKenzy brothers did the install while downing too many Molsens (EH? Hoser?)
Not only do you seem to hate the NCRS, you seem to be biggoted against Canadians. Get a life loser.
I put a pertronix set-up in a 65 Buick 401 nailhead, ran it for close to 15 years with no problems. It did run a lot better at Idle and I did notice a slight improvment in gas milage. As far as performance?..... well we all have different definations of what performance is.
if the engine runs better and there is an increase in mpg, then I would have to say that, yes, there was an improvment in preformance.
BTW, that 401 had over 150K on it and never been apart and could suck the doors off anything going up the Grapevine ! WOO- WAHH