stock crossfire intake
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
stock crossfire intake
OK, Im WELL aware of the limitations of the STOCK crossfire intake, however I have a race shop that allows me to use there flow bench. I first flow tested the stock intake, uderwhelming to say the least since the intake was designed to be used on a 305 cid engine. Well i was commetted to keep this car as close as stock as possible. I researched my options junk the system and go to a carb set-up w/ many intakes to choose from? Well do that and you just decreased the vaue of your vette. OR go to the X-ram or renagade intake? STILL not stock!! Well after many hours of research and discussion with the race shop I decided I would try and increase the flow rating as much as possible with the STOCK crossfire intake. Using a Holley contender intake as my goal for flow. 1st I cut the egr casing out, then cut the runners down by 1 inch removed all casting flaws, using a Dremel w/flex head curved intake ports, and CAREFULLY increased the total port volume by about 3/8" or more total. on the flow bench now out performed the Holley contender!!!!!
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Crossfire rebuild
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 15
I bought a used intake for my CFI not to hurt my original and did exactly what what you and must say WOW what a difference. Did you port match them as well? If so notice how much they close off the flow, supposely GM did that to get more torque. Who knows... Anyway did you also get rid of the vanes under the throttle body.
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 15
With these motors you have to be carefull on cam selection, these computers can't handle the adjustments (80Bps). The biggest would be a Comp U Cam 2040 unless you upgrade to a Ham board.
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
vanes?
I bought a used intake for my CFI not to hurt my original and did exactly what what you and must say WOW what a difference. Did you port match them as well? If so notice how much they close off the flow, supposely GM did that to get more torque. Who knows... Anyway did you also get rid of the vanes under the throttle body.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!
Brett Foote
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know
Joe Kucinski
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2
Michael S. Palmer
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor
Joe Kucinski
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Cam size
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
poorly engineered
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 15
You are exactly RIGHT i used that EXACT cam 440-I/454-E, .50 dur 210-I/216-E, IMHO the real power is in the heads AND CAREFULLY matching all parts. I did MANY hrs of research before I came up with combination I have. I ALMOST went to a carb system ALMOST! do that and you just decreased the value of your vette!
So which head did you use i.e. year , make?
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
headst
There a late casting 1990 head. dam can't remember the casting #s I think they were used on the goodwrench 350 crate motor, heavy casting though VERY! no worries about cracks between the valves LIKE the original heads. Meaning you can really do some HEAVY porting that the org. heads could'nt take all about the flow right? Yeah I got the same gear, personally I like it w/ the R4 700 decent lowend and barely idling at cruising speeds good for mpg's! Before the re-build I could get about 25-26 mpg's on the hwy.
Melting Slicks
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,248
Likes: 67
From: Warrington PA
Finalist 2020 C4 of the Year - Unmodified
Good thread, I also have a spare CFI set-up and would like to attempt this mod in the future. Sounds like it is really worth the time to get great results.
Le Mans Master
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 6,692
Likes: 29
From: Texas
In the late 90's, I did a basic port matching of my crossfire manifold, did away with the egr tunnel, smoothed the inside everywhere I could, did not cut back the runners (wish I did, but no one advised to do so, at that time), cut the sides of the swirl plate insert down, leaving only the vanes, new fuel pump, bumped fuel pressure to 15 psi, 1/2" tbi spacers (custom made for me). For those that might remember Twinnie/Twin Turbo, he made fun of my setup, calling it a Submarine sandwich. But I can break rubber in second gear on concrete. I only get 17 mpg at best, most of the time 15. But with high flow cat and borla's (for an 84 given to me with only 500 miles on them), my car accelerates great and sounds more powerful than it is. I know I am now below 7 secs in 0-60, which is a nice improvement from stock. Oh - engine replaced with the basic GM motor in about '98, which is suppose to have 249hp but with a carb and open headers.
Last edited by Wrecked82; Feb 5, 2013 at 02:51 PM.
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 15
In the late 90's, I did a basic port matching of my crossfire manifold, did away with the egr tunnel, smoothed the inside everywhere I could, did not cut back the runners (wish I did, but no one advised to do so, at that time), cut the sides of the swirl plate insert down, leaving only the vanes, new fuel pump, bumped fuel pressure to 15 psi, 1/2" tbi spacers (custom made for me). For those that might remember Twinnie/Twin Turbo, he made fun of me setup, calling it a Submarine sandwich. But I can break rubber in second gear on concrete. I only get 17 mpg at best, most of the time 15. But with high flow cat and borla's (for an 84 given to me with only 500 miles on them), my car accelerates great and sounds more powerful than it is. I know I am not below 7 secs in 0-60, which is a nice improvement from stock. Oh - engine replaced with the basic GM motor in about '98, which is suppose to have 249hp but with a carb and open headers.
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Mpg
Thats not very good on the mpg's?? I had a 1987 C-10 W/ A 350 3.55 rear gears w/a R4 700 getting 17.5 on the highway? That does'nt make sense? A buddy of mine has a 1980 [carbed]vette getting 15 mpg's on the highway? That fp is kinda low, you can take the rear tb off [drivers side] and cut the weld off the rod to make it adjustable, shoot for about 15psi. Turn the rod COUNTER clockwise to increase fp, not sure if your stock pump will produce 15psi? Min.13psi, the 25-26 mpg I got was on a flat hwy and at 60mph.
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
crossfire porting
BTW do alot of measuring to get the ports as close AS possible.
Melting Slicks
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 15
Thats not very good on the mpg's?? I had a 1987 C-10 W/ A 350 3.55 rear gears w/a R4 700 getting 17.5 on the highway? That does'nt make sense? A buddy of mine has a 1980 [carbed]vette getting 15 mpg's on the highway? That fp is kinda low, you can take the rear tb off [drivers side] and cut the weld off the rod to make it adjustable, shoot for about 15psi. Turn the rod COUNTER clockwise to increase fp, not sure if your stock pump will produce 15psi? Min.13psi, the 25-26 mpg I got was on a flat hwy and at 60mph.
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Runner length, the looooong runners were supposed to increase low-end torque HOWEVER there to long and too SMALL for any real top-end power. You have to take alot of material out of the port size [CAREFULLY] don't forget you got a water jacket on the bottom. and on the length cut about 1" off the port inlet and angle the port at about 35 degrees that opens up the top of the port allowing the intake charge to inter the port at a higher velocity then the stock port which has to go down and around slowing the velocity down quite a bit.