








Drop Spindle Poll









I wish you could do 2" on the spindles , But anything is better than where we are today.
I was just about to mod a cross member this weekend
Hurry up Van Steel !!!
Building me a RAFT Racer copy !!




I wish you could do 2" on the spindles , But anything is better than where we are today.
I was just about to mod a cross member this weekend
Hurry up Van Steel !!!
Building me a RAFT Racer copy !!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





Rookie questions: 1. Would 2" drop spindles cause huge geometry problems that will not allow enough suspension RE-adjustment?
.......OR.....
2. Is it just a matter of retaining factory/near-factory specs on any drop spindles?
(I bought "soft" 330# coil springs knowing that the rate would increase after cutting coils...the "ride" is firmer now/just "right")



I've looked into using dropped Impala spindles because the parts interchange manuals list 69-70 disc brake Impala spindles are the same as 69-82 Corvette spindles. I contacted 2 manufacturers of the dropped Impala spindles who both told me they will not work with the Corvette caliper bracket.





Other than unless the distance between ball joints is different, 2" drop spindles would only lower front ride height by the 2", thus lowering front CG and RC in the process. There would be no change to spring rates, caster, camber gain, bumpsteer, Ackerman, ICs, etc., but front scrub radius would actually increase. Adjustability shouldn't be affected, but you'd need to pay closer attention to outer tie-rod end clearance, especially if looking to increase wheel BS. (This steering arm link point cannot be raised to increase clearance without affecting bumpsteer.)
FWIW, tho drops appear to be a fairly straight forward way to go about lowering, I would urge doing so by conventional means (read, "reducing loaded spring heights") down to between 1" and 1.25" Z height - as recommended for road racing the Chevy Power Corvette chassis section - before considering drops, and to only consider drops only if intent on slamming to a point which would otherwise put Z at less than 1". Down to this point of diminishing returns, there are benefits to be had from changing the upper and lower CA angles. And, if you have the funds, coil overs would let you adjust ride height on the fly, while maintaining whatever proves to be your optimal spring rate. Which ever way you go, you still have the matters of caster and bumpsteer with which to deal. HTH

TSW
Last edited by TheSkunkWorks; Jan 3, 2015 at 01:56 PM. Reason: clarification






I've looked into using dropped Impala spindles because the parts interchange manuals list 69-70 disc brake Impala spindles are the same as 69-82 Corvette spindles. I contacted 2 manufacturers of the dropped Impala spindles who both told me they will not work with the Corvette caliper bracket.
They (Impala) after looking into it a littler further- definitely won't work. Notice on the Impala- the top mount for the brake caliper bracket is parallel w/ the face- where as the Corvette is stepped back over an inch....AND it doesn't look like you could mill it back that much.
http://www.classicindustries.com/pro...ts/bs7001.html
69-70 Impala w/ Disc Brakes
Stock 69-82 Corvette-



The drawing for the spindles are just about done and we have to finish the steering arms. To get to where we wanted to be we ended up using C5/6 hubs. Once all the drawings are done, we will fabricate a few pair and do our final measurements and testing which will most likely be at Sebring and in Cali.
We are drawing something up to raise the inner TR ends.













