When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
A friend gave me an old magazine from 1991 by Consumer Reports. It is the story of the Corvette. It is a great book about the Corvette and follows the Corvette through 1991. However...It calls the generation we know as the 3rd gen the 5th gen, and the c4 is the 6th gen. They don't reference the generations but once or twice in the magazine so I can't really put a pattern to it. Can anyone explain why Consumer Reports calls the C3 the 5th generation Corvette?
Hi CT,
WAAAAY back in the beginning there was NO mention of generations.
People generally grouped the cars as:
53-55
56-57
58-62
63-67
68+
68+ cars were thus the 5th group.
I believe the "generation" business was marketing "lingo" that came along later.
Regards,
Alan
Consider the source.
Consumer reports knows virtually nothing about cars.
I've been noticing this for years.
Just more comedy from a joke of a magazine. (more geared toward toasters and blenders)
the C1 -C7 thing was never terms used by GM until the C7 I think, so all that talk is just what people like us made up along the way.
The dreaded "C" terms were first used internally by GM Engineering in the mid 90's, when they were developing the 97 Corvette. GM Engineering used C4 and C5 to differentiate between development work going on for the still in production 94-96 Corvettes, and the upcoming "new" 97 Corvette.
As Alan said, there was a time when people lumped Corvettes together based on their body styles, not the chassis/body structure. The generations were considered to be 53-55, 56-57, 58-62, 63-67, and 68-82.
Consider the source.
Consumer reports knows virtually nothing about cars.
I've been noticing this for years.
Just more comedy from a joke of a magazine. (more geared toward toasters and blenders)
Very true, but this is different. It's a great read with tons of pics, and even pics of several clay models, and lots of pics of the designs and prototypes that didn't make it. It's actually done quite well.
Those types of books are all 'interesting reads' and informative. But, you have to realize that each author puts his/her own "spin" on events in the life of the Corvette. And, the author may or may not have had any direct involvement with any of thos events. So, you can read that information, but you have to compare it with similar info from other sources to gain confidence in the "facts".
The old adage that, "if you tell a story long enough, it becomes truth", is definitely a reality. Some accepted stories about Corvette lore likely never happened....and I'm sure that there were a LOT of other real stories that we have never heard.
Last edited by 7T1vette; Dec 30, 2015 at 10:23 PM.
At some point after 1967, what we now know as C2 were called "midyears". The middle being between C1 and C3, but they weren't called that then, but the "Sting Rays" were also called midyears.
Those types of books are all 'interesting reads' and informative. But, you have to realize that each author puts his/her own "spin" on events in the life of the Corvette. And, the author may or may not have had any direct involvement with any of thos events. So, you can read that information, but you have to compare it with similar info from other sources to gain confidence in the "facts".
The old adage that, "if you tell a story long enough, it becomes truth", is definitely a reality. Some accepted stories about Corvette lore likely never happened....and I'm sure that there were a LOT of other real stories that we have never heard.
Which reminds me................In 1958 my cousin who was approx. 18 y.o. at the time submitted a "model" of a car he envisioned to a magazine that was having a "Contest". He was awarded 1st Place and received a check for $100 (big money in those days)...........his model looked similar to a '73 (without rear chrome bumpers).
Last edited by doorgunner; Dec 31, 2015 at 10:37 PM.
...The C terminology has been publicly used by GM since the C5 generation 97 to 04...
My money says GM picked up the term from all the media hype regarding the C4. I first saw the use of the C generation terminology in the Corvette print media in articles involving what would become the C4.
These days, it have become part of the Corvette vernacular.
Last edited by Easy Mike; Jan 1, 2016 at 07:06 AM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.