C3 General General C3 Corvette Discussion not covered in Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1970 454 coupe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2017 | 09:00 PM
  #21  
maj75's Avatar
maj75
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 968
Likes: 122
From: Lighthouse Point FL
Default

I'm no expert, but it looks like a re-stamp compared to Alan's pictures.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2017 | 09:23 PM
  #22  
7T1vette's Avatar
7T1vette
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 37,637
Likes: 3,118
From: Crossville TN
Default

These impressions were made with a "gang" stamp...all of the individual digits clamped in a holder and set/hammered with one blow.

The same gang stamp was used on the transmission and on the frame to tie all components together. You can look at the other stamps on your car to see if they look the same or somewhat different.

It is very possible that the original engine was rebuilt and then re-stamped with the correct information. It is also possible that a different block was reconditioned and the info pad re-stamped with the numbers that came on the other engine. The circular (mill) marks that Alan71 mentioned would lead us to believe that the engine was re-stamped: but we can't determine if the block you now have is the one that originally came with the car or not.

If the trans / frame stamps with car S/N look identical to the stamping on the engine, that would certainly raise a question as to whether the block was re-stamped. If you can also get a pic of either of those stamps and post it, that would be very 'telling'.

P.S. The reason for the stamping being 'deep' on one end and 'shallow' on the other is that the person doing that job did not have the gang stamp letters all in contact with the metal surface when the gang was struck. It was a bit cocked before being struck.

Last edited by 7T1vette; Aug 30, 2017 at 09:27 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2017 | 09:33 PM
  #23  
jr9170's Avatar
jr9170
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,238
Likes: 1,092
From: YANKEES UNIVERSE 70 454-LS5 500 ft-lbs Torque
Default

The engine suffix stamp looks very deep.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2017 | 09:35 PM
  #24  
jr9170's Avatar
jr9170
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,238
Likes: 1,092
From: YANKEES UNIVERSE 70 454-LS5 500 ft-lbs Torque
Default

thelal1, is this a 70 LS5 you own or looking to buy? Any other pics you can post would help.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2017 | 09:50 PM
  #25  
BBCorv70's Avatar
BBCorv70
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 111
From: Tolland CT
Default

The engine date/build code looks strange to my eye, a bit like the characters were stamped individually. With the speculation on the last digit of the VIN, uncertainty, I'd say this will raise a lot of flags with future buyers. IMO it will hurt the value, not likely to get full credit for being original. It may fetch more than an acknowledged NOM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2017 | 10:37 PM
  #26  
jr9170's Avatar
jr9170
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 13,238
Likes: 1,092
From: YANKEES UNIVERSE 70 454-LS5 500 ft-lbs Torque
Default

I agree. I have a lot of LS5 engine stamp pics on my iPad that I save as I come across them and this one falls into the restamp pics I have.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2017 | 10:39 PM
  #27  
LS4 PILOT's Avatar
LS4 PILOT
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 40
Default

That looks fake to me ...those 5 s are funky and the W ....and its not very uniform depth and spacing either . Im giving it the big " GONG " ��

the iron has lost the broach lines .


i was looking a t 454 blocks far back as 1978 trying to find original cars . They are few and far between , most had counter replacements warrenty or 402 / 396 engines replacing the 454 originals . i look at a chit load back then .....kinda like 302 Z28 s .....alot


missing the born with engines.

Last edited by LS4 PILOT; Aug 30, 2017 at 10:43 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2017 | 10:44 PM
  #28  
joewill's Avatar
joewill
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,458
Likes: 331
From: Indy Indiana
Default

it is still a stamp pad with an excuse, and will not get all possible points in a judging.

therefor you will take a hit at selling time when compared to a no excuses stamp.

the no excuses cars with the correct stamps , date casting codes, part numbers, doc, provenance, are the ones that go for the bigger bucks.

as stated by several, check other parts for stampings, and determine the casting date of the block by looking back behind the distributor. the tranny stamp comparison and the block casting date are very important in validating your stamp. publish those pics if you can for the experts on this site to see.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 08:05 AM
  #29  
thelal1's Avatar
thelal1
Thread Starter
Pro
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 534
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default 1970 454

Originally Posted by 7T1vette
These impressions were made with a "gang" stamp...all of the individual digits clamped in a holder and set/hammered with one blow.

The same gang stamp was used on the transmission and on the frame to tie all components together. You can look at the other stamps on your car to see if they look the same or somewhat different.

It is very possible that the original engine was rebuilt and then re-stamped with the correct information. It is also possible that a different block was reconditioned and the info pad re-stamped with the numbers that came on the other engine. The circular (mill) marks that Alan71 mentioned would lead us to believe that the engine was re-stamped: but we can't determine if the block you now have is the one that originally came with the car or not.


If the trans / frame stamps with car S/N look identical to the stamping on the engine, that would certainly raise a question as to whether the block was re-stamped. If you can also get a pic of either of those stamps and post it, that would be very 'telling'.

P.S. The reason for the stamping being 'deep' on one end and 'shallow' on the other is that the person doing that job did not have the gang stamp letters all in contact with the metal surface when the gang was struck. It was a bit cocked before being struck.
It was documented by the shop that did a complete overhaul of the block, that they did deck the block. When they were done with all the machine work they put the Engine code on the sheet, then they put the vin code but left off the last digit. This was done in 1994.
Car also has a tank sticker with car. One of the things that concerns me also, is the mileage at 99,000.
Transmission has the id tag on it.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 08:10 AM
  #30  
thelal1's Avatar
thelal1
Thread Starter
Pro
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 534
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by jr9170
thelal1, is this a 70 LS5 you own or looking to buy? Any other pics you can post would help.
Looking to buy. The engine rebuild sheets from 1994, 4 pages, show that they did deck the block, When they were finished they put the engine code and then the Vin # but the last digit was gone, on the work order.
Another thing is the mileage. Nice looking car, Asking $24,500.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 08:13 AM
  #31  
thelal1's Avatar
thelal1
Thread Starter
Pro
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 534
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by 7T1vette
These impressions were made with a "gang" stamp...all of the individual digits clamped in a holder and set/hammered with one blow.

The same gang stamp was used on the transmission and on the frame to tie all components together. You can look at the other stamps on your car to see if they look the same or somewhat different.

It is very possible that the original engine was rebuilt and then re-stamped with the correct information. It is also possible that a different block was reconditioned and the info pad re-stamped with the numbers that came on the other engine. The circular (mill) marks that Alan71 mentioned would lead us to believe that the engine was re-stamped: but we can't determine if the block you now have is the one that originally came with the car or not.

If the trans / frame stamps with car S/N look identical to the stamping on the engine, that would certainly raise a question as to whether the block was re-stamped. If you can also get a pic of either of those stamps and post it, that would be very 'telling'.

P.S. The reason for the stamping being 'deep' on one end and 'shallow' on the other is that the person doing that job did not have the gang stamp letters all in contact with the metal surface when the gang was struck. It was a bit cocked before being struck.
In 1994 the engine was completely remachined and in the 4 pages on the work order, they decked the block. could that be why on the left side the letters are shallow?
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 08:18 AM
  #32  
thelal1's Avatar
thelal1
Thread Starter
Pro
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 534
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by joewill
it is still a stamp pad with an excuse, and will not get all possible points in a judging.

therefor you will take a hit at selling time when compared to a no excuses stamp.

the no excuses cars with the correct stamps , date casting codes, part numbers, doc, provenance, are the ones that go for the bigger bucks.

as stated by several, check other parts for stampings, and determine the casting date of the block by looking back behind the distributor. the tranny stamp comparison and the block casting date are very important in validating your stamp. publish those pics if you can for the experts on this site to see.
All those numbers, the heads,intake,block all fall into buid date on car.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 08:22 AM
  #33  
Alan 71's Avatar
Alan 71
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Active Streak: 120 Days
Community Influencer
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 31,266
Likes: 4,355
From: Westminster Maryland
Default

Hi,
The current surface of the pad is not the result of the block being decked during rebuilding. Decking leaves a uniform, but not typical of production, surface.

The current surface of the pad is the result of a GRINDER being used to remove pad material in the area of the original engine assembly stamp.

What this has done to the value of the car is for the buyer to decide.
Regards,
Alan
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 08:24 AM
  #34  
thelal1's Avatar
thelal1
Thread Starter
Pro
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 534
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by jr9170
thelal1, is this a 70 LS5 you own or looking to buy? Any other pics you can post would help.
Looking to buy. Owner has tank sticker and motor rebuild done in 1994. They did a complete engine spec and rework. In the paperwork they show that the block was decked. They put on the work order, the engine code and the vin numbers but the last digit was missing. Could decking the block be the reason of shallow on right side on vin?
Nice looking car. Suspension recently done in front and back. Another thing that concerns me is the mileage, 99,000.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 08:46 AM
  #35  
Easy Mike's Avatar
Easy Mike
Team Owner
Supporting Lifetime
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 38,923
Likes: 1,481
From: Southbound
Cruise-In II Veteran
Default

Originally Posted by thelal1
...Looking to buy...
As a driver, this could be a nice car. If you are interested in having the car judged, pass on it.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 09:13 AM
  #36  
thelal1's Avatar
thelal1
Thread Starter
Pro
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 534
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by PKguitar
A restamp is always possible. However, it is possible yours is original. Especially if the motor was rebuilt at some point. Normally when a motor is rebuilt, the builder will want to "deck" the block to make sure the mating surface for the heads is true. Good builders will know on valuable cars to deck the block very lightly in order to save the original stampings. This could be the reason you have no broach marks. The 9 being more faint than the other numbers is a little unusual, but I guess that could have happened of the block was not perfectly flat there, and a little more of the metal around that number got ground off during decking than the rest of the stamp pad.

There really is no substitute for having someone knowledgeable look at the pad in person.

FWIW: If I was looking to buy that car, I would be concerned about a lot more things than just the stamp pad. If everything else was in order, and a knowledgeable person said the pad looks good for an original stamping with a light decking, I wouldn't worry much about it.
Was worried about mileage too, 99,000.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 09:15 AM
  #37  
thelal1's Avatar
thelal1
Thread Starter
Pro
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 534
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default 1970 454

Originally Posted by Easy Mike
As a driver, this could be a nice car. If you are interested in having the car judged, pass on it.
He's asking 24,500. mileage at 99,000. Nice paint, recently had suspension redone. Nice car with tank sticker.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To 1970 454 coupe

Old Aug 31, 2017 | 09:49 AM
  #38  
thelal1's Avatar
thelal1
Thread Starter
Pro
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 534
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by jr9170
Here one for u to compare
Do you think that having machine work done to engine, decking, or sanding could have done that. The owner said he has checked block, intake and haed numbers that match build date assembly.
Attached Images       
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 10:11 AM
  #39  
Alan 71's Avatar
Alan 71
Team Owner
15 Year Member
Active Streak: 120 Days
Community Influencer
Top Answer: 5
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 31,266
Likes: 4,355
From: Westminster Maryland
Default

Hi L,
It looks like a nice car IN THE PHOTOS.
It's really a shame what was done to the pad when the engine was rebuilt.
Perhaps the asking price is a reflection of what the car actually is.
Regards,
Alan

What's the rust situation?

Last edited by Alan 71; Aug 31, 2017 at 10:13 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2017 | 01:06 PM
  #40  
joewill's Avatar
joewill
Safety Car
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,458
Likes: 331
From: Indy Indiana
Default

new suspension, rebuilt engine, nice paint.. easily a 24K car if no rust...

rare to see a 70 big block that low a asking price. it would be sold by now if not other issues?

99K miles equates to 2100 miles a year. don't let that scare you away.

if you can't authenticate originality, then base your price that you will pay on the condition. of the car.

if your requirements are based on originality, then do your homework before you commit to playing that game.

many a rookie gets burned when playing the matching numbers game.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 11:09:53


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE