When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Speaking of Muncie specifically, Close Ratio has a 2.20 low gear, and CLOSER spreads between the gears 1-2-3-4. It is a bit tougher (not as much torque multiplication) to launch, especially with highway gears, but once in the power range of the motor (mid-higher rpm), as you shift it will help keep you in that rpm range and keep your momentum.
Wide Ratio typically have a 2.52 low gear, and WIDER spreads between your shifts 1-2-3-4. For street driving especially, the wide ratio provides a lower overall gear ratio (given same rearend) than the close ratio, so is a bit easier to launch and take off. One of the trade-offs is larger rpm drops between each gear as you shift. For racing one might not want that. The nice part of the wide ratio is you can get away with a more friendly highway type rear gear, but still manageable to launch around town.
Both have their place, depending on what you want to do with the car. There are also aftermarket gears offered to help you better match what you are trying to accomplish.
Speaking of Muncie specifically, Close Ratio has a 2.20 low gear, and CLOSER spreads between the gears 1-2-3-4. It is a bit tougher (not as much torque multiplication) to launch, especially with highway gears, but once in the power range of the motor (mid-higher rpm), as you shift it will help keep you in that rpm range and keep your momentum.
Wide Ratio typically have a 2.52 low gear, and WIDER spreads between your shifts 1-2-3-4. For street driving especially, the wide ratio provides a lower overall gear ratio (given same rearend) than the close ratio, so is a bit easier to launch and take off. One of the trade-offs is larger rpm drops between each gear as you shift. For racing one might not want that. The nice part of the wide ratio is you can get away with a more friendly highway type rear gear, but still manageable to launch around town.
Both have their place, depending on what you want to do with the car. There are also aftermarket gears offered to help you better match what you are trying to accomplish.
If 1980, then yes it should be BW. No expert, but believe that would be a Super T-10 4spd, aluminum case from the factory, and actually has an even lower 3.42 low gear. Not known (allegedly) to be the most rugged 4 speed from the factory (but neither are stock Muncie's if you start putting on sticky tires).
If 1980, then yes it should be BW. No expert, but believe that would be a Super T-10 4spd, aluminum case from the factory, and actually has an even lower 3.42 low gear. Not known (allegedly) to be the most rugged 4 speed from the factory (but neither are stock Muncie's if you start putting on sticky tires).
If a guy has 650 h.p. . in a 74 vet...what would be the most durable tranny ?
Depends on what you want to do with that 650 hp.
If the 650 hp is just for show and cruising around with the occasional burnout on crappy street tires then even the lowly Saginaw would suffice.
If the 650 hp will be used to dump the clutch at high revs using sticky tires every weekend at the 1/4 mile track then you need to look at contemporary 5 and 6 $peed offerings from Tremec and others.
A stock Muncie is pretty strong and will handle most anything in between.
If 1980, then yes it should be BW. No expert, but believe that would be a Super T-10 4spd, aluminum case from the factory, and actually has an even lower 3.42 low gear. Not known (allegedly) to be the most rugged 4 speed from the factory (but neither are stock Muncie's if you start putting on sticky tires).
Originally Posted by Dynra Rockets
Depends on what you want to do with that 650 hp.
If the 650 hp is just for show and cruising around with the occasional burnout on crappy street tires then even the lowly Saginaw would suffice.
If the 650 hp will be used to dump the clutch at high revs using sticky tires every weekend at the 1/4 mile track then you need to look at contemporary 5 and 6 $peed offerings from Tremec and others.
A stock Muncie is pretty strong and will handle most anything in between.
how aboit a stock 1980 borg Warner t 10...is that as strong as a Muncie?
how aboit a stock 1980 borg Warner t 10...is that as strong as a Muncie?
The Muncie and the BW T-10 are related and share a lot of design features. The BW is also a strong trans like the Muncie but internet lore says the Muncie is a tick stronger.
There are a lot of websites and forums that discuss the perceived strength differences between a Muncie and a BW T-10, make sure to spend some time with your favorite browser to decide yourself.
The Muncie and the BW T-10 are related and share a lot of design features. The BW is also a strong trans like the Muncie but internet lore says the Muncie is a tick stronger.
There are a lot of websites and forums that discuss the perceived strength differences between a Muncie and a BW T-10, make sure to spend some time with your favorite browser to decide yourself.
what could i get out of this 1980 bw t10 complete tranny . bell and shifter ? Also any other parts off an 80 that would bring much money if i could find someone. Needy ?
Here is a BW ST-10 rebuilt and updated to mate with a new 383 stroker and 3.36 HD rear end. It also has a Hurst shifter installed. I look forward to years of fun with it. David
Last edited by AllC34Me; Oct 17, 2017 at 07:10 AM.
I'm a T5 guy myself, have one in each of my two Chevy's, however, for those on a budget, I have had very good luck with the lowly 3 ring wide ratio Saginaw, has a 3.50 first gear, done many a happy burnout in by old Chevy Van, just can't speedshift with a 4 on the tree.