When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hi tha,
I think for a car like a 70 LT-! the milage does matter… to some folks.
A car with lower mileage is more likely to still have more of it's original parts.
Mechanical (carburetor, waterpump, radiator, fan clutch, alternator, starter for instance), chassis, (ball joints, t-arms, shock absorbers, springs for instance), and interior (dash pads, door panels, gauges, seat belts, pedal pads, for instance), exterior (glass, bumpers, grills, trim, emblems for instance).
As I said this matters to SOME people.
Regards,
Alan
According to some shady dealers out there, that car only has 36k miles
From my perspective, many folks give a mental ding over 100k. It's ingrained in most of our heads.
Though if I'm comparing a 136k car that is very nice shape vs. a 100k car in ok shape, I'd go with the 136k car. Now if you were comparing a 70k car in ok shape and a 136k in very nice shape, I'd prob. go with the 70k car.
Revi's one sentence really says it all. At 100k or 136K everything is shot and needs replacing or everything has been replaced.
Alan adds to that saying to look for original parts and their condition to judge the mileage rather than believing the odometer.
Originally Posted by thelal1
On a 1970 LT1, how much is the value affected at 136,000 verse under 100,000 miles.
On a near 50 year old car, if it looks cared for, I could not care less what the mileage is.
Mileage is a modern car concern. Deterioration due to the elements, as well as neglect, are far more important factors over time. Cars that have sat for decades are the worst. Ask me how I know this.