When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
I suppose that's one reason a 427 block sells for 5 grand on ebay ? Wasn't even a Corvette block just had the right date code, and we thought the buyer was an idiot
Or that the NCRS actually condones block restamping.
With "original" cars optioned correctly pulling well over $100K, isn't this simply enabling the counterfeiters to repop any car they want?
Even a car like this one with a (ahem) questionable history selling for that number, doesn't this just reinforce a truly documented and historied vehicle selling for even MORE?
Is this endorsement simply self serving for the NCRS in the end?
I gotta go get me some of those NCRS stickers.....
We all know that 427/435 cars are manufactured. We joke about it all the time. It is just interesting and unusual to catch one so openly that was sold on national TV! Similarly 1 or 2 years ago a bigblock vette went for large $$ at BJ auction and based on the vin it was clearly too early to be a real 1965 (I think) 425 hp car. Even the Proteam website had a comment about that one.
The only truly fraudulent thing I see about this totally fake car is the tank sticker. If a restoration means taking a car entirely apart and putting it back together and it is permissible to use reproduction parts, why stop at using new bumpers, and wheels, and tires, and glass, and trim, and emblems..... hey let's use 427 emblems, and carpet (hey, let's use a different color) and paint (I prefer black vs yellow). I am very nearly to the point that I don't care anymore. Any restored car is a restored car to me. It doesn't matter what it used to be. It is what it is.... and I dont trust ANY of them!!
In Nov-Dec 2003 we read that VIN...802 was a body damaged small block with an incorrect engine. In Nov 2004 the barrett-jackson auction offer VIN....802 appearing as an immaculate seemingly correct and very rare 427/435.
That's not much time to create such a make-over expecially when the 427/435 is going to require a lot of hard to find parts and once found there's a lot of time required to restore them...and so many other consumers of time.
Is it possible that the "427/435" really was in existance as another car and the VIN tag of the real VIN...802 was simply exchanged
???? That would help understand how such a dramatic transformation could appear to have happened in less than a year.
I wonder how a reproduction tank sticker can be aged to appear real.
Exactly...which is why it seems so much more likely to me that the owner of the yellow car simply misread/mistyped a digit in the VIN when placing the newspaper ad. All those changes in only about a year just don't add up...but typos happen all the tjme.
Rick,
That was the genesis of my question: the possibility of a typo leading to the current fuss.
Yeah, I'm with you, 68/70vette, Dalannex, etc. Quite often, the simplest explanation is the right one (Occam's Razor?)
You're also right in that it sure has caused quite a fuss...assuming it was just a typo.
I like the fact that my block, trans, tank sticker, etc. all have numbers that match (well, at least I think), but I'm starting to think it's kinda silly after watching this thread.
...ok, no I don't, I still like my matching numbers.
Don't you watch overhaulin, they do a whole car over in a week. But I agree it sounds like either a VIN swap or an error in posting the correct VIN'S
are you kidding? You don't think 6 months is enough time to do a complete body off the frame total resusistoration?? It's the same car (well, much of it) , the same vin, no mistakes.
And if you want Kevin's cell phone number, I have that issue of the Driveline. It is a Colorado number.... maybe Lars knows him. It would be interesting to know who he sold it to...
Here is the picture from the BJ auction website.... something about that background looks familiar.... I wonder who the seller was??
Hey, anyone here want to buy a bridge, for sale cheap, it connects Brooklyn to Manhatten. A typo in the vin. #, possible, not probable. Peace, Craig
P.S. Hey Doc, what hockey season, maybe club hockey , sure wasnt NHL.
"Numbers Matching" is allowed to use a correct date-coded block and re-stamp the VIN.
This is acceptable to NCRS rules.
This is only true if you are restoring the car to it's original engine configuration whether it be a BB or SB. Forgeries, even though produced daily are per NCRS rules.
Or that the NCRS actually condones block restamping.
With "original" cars optioned correctly pulling well over $100K, isn't this simply enabling the counterfeiters to repop any car they want?
Even a car like this one with a (ahem) questionable history selling for that number, doesn't this just reinforce a truly documented and historied vehicle selling for even MORE?
Is this endorsement simply self serving for the NCRS in the end?
I gotta go get me some of those NCRS stickers.....
Oh goody, another poorly informed basher.
It was a prominent NCRS member that brought the information forward that this car is a forgery.
This car has not been judged at an NCRS event since it's 'magical' transformation and I doubt it would do well given the extent of the forgery.
While NCRS does not penalize restoration motors (ie restamping a correct big block - for a big block car) It is very much against forgeries like this one. Read up on the subject a little please.