When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
When I wrote how some maximize their auction potential in a Corvette with and without NCRS, I had no idea it would be demonstrated so clearly and so soon. http://www.ncrs.org/forum/tech.cgi/read/162644
After just a few days, my old friend Loren Lundberg would alert us to these 2 different descriptions of 1967 VIN 802 on the National Camel Rider Society tech board. Some old herders, keep a data base of these things. (I also must thank Loren for confirming my 68 was an L89 when he saw her in AZ decades before she was a fashionable old girl in a Yellow dress.)
BJ never claimed it's a numbers only..ad says restored to NCRS specs...you can interpret it two ways, a cloned 427/435 or nuumbers matching...this is a case where the fool never heard about documentation....
BJ never claimed it's a numbers only..ad says restored to NCRS specs...you can interpret it two ways, a cloned 427/435 or nuumbers matching...this is a case where the fool never heard about documentation....
Hmmm...the BJ description says "This stunning 1967 427/435 Black Coupe with Red leather interior is numbers matching". However, it also says that it has tank sticker, and photos of the restore, which seem like they couldn't easily hide it being yellow w/ white interior like the newspaper ad says it was. Did someone just mistype the last few digits of the VIN?
Hmmm...the BJ description says "This stunning 1967 427/435 Black Coupe with Red leather interior is numbers matching". However, it also says that it has tank sticker, and photos of the restore, which seem like they couldn't easily hide it being yellow w/ white interior like the newspaper ad says it was. Did someone just mistype the last few digits of the VIN?
"Numbers Matching" is allowed to use a correct date-coded block and re-stamp the VIN.
This is acceptable to NCRS rules.
Now, I'm not sure how they look at replacing the body tag, but you
can buy new body tags easy enough.
Doesn't the auction house have some responsibility in this? It seems like they would at least be expected to do some due diligence- eg check the numbers on the block - but I guess the answer is no. I hope he at least drives the car!
B-J does not verify cars. They sell 1000s of cars a year. That was pointed out many times during the TV auction. They depend on the sellers description and the buyers to do their homework. I've been to B-J...nobody could check out all those cars. B-J sells cars and that's all they do.
"Numbers Matching" is allowed to use a correct date-coded block and re-stamp the VIN.
This is acceptable to NCRS rules.
Now, I'm not sure how they look at replacing the body tag, but you
can buy new body tags easy enough.
Which is why the NCRS does not use the terms numbers matching.
Yes, you can restamp engines and buy bogus trim tags. Just don't get piXXed when you get caught on the judging field and get hit with a huge deduct. And don't punch the trim tag guy in the nose like happened at Bloomington.
I also have to wonder if the add for the yellow car has the VIN typed wrong or something. It would seem to me that it would be pretty hard to cover up a history like that. If it is the same car, which is just as possible, somebody had to do a serious resto job on that car to get it to what they call original now. It still appears that it is not what I call numbers matching. To me numbers matching means the motor and trans that came from the factory.
Notice documentation does not include a long history of winning awards. This car has never seen an NCRS judging event. Notice the seller does not misrepresent the car...only that it is a numbers matching, and that it has the original owners manual, etc...hell my 75 camaro has the original owners manual.
Why are you defending these people? I have no problem taking a base car and popping a 427/435 in it but they also forged the engine stampings as well as forged a tank sticker, body tag and who knows what else. Also note that the original add says the car has extensive body damage and the BJ auction doesn't mention it.
Definition of fraud is to knowingly represent something that it is not for monetary gain. This car fits that to a t. It's a fraud.
Why are you defending these people? I have no problem taking a base car and popping a 427/435 in it but they also forged the engine stampings as well as forged a tank sticker, body tag and who knows what else. Also note that the original add says the car has extensive body damage and the BJ auction doesn't mention it.
Definition of fraud is to knowingly represent something that it is not for monetary gain. This car fits that to a t. It's a fraud.
I don't get that impression he's defending anyone...just making a blanket statement that the car has never been judged...I will say it again, buyer's own fault....he did not do any homework on the car or use common sense. You don't go to a car auction with blind trust. Lot of swindlers out there looking for a patsy to make a big score.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.