When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I am a new owner of a C3 (1977) Vette. I have had it for a week now and have been busy getting things to work. This is my first ever Vette though I have wanted one since about 1973.
My question is this. After driving for a half hour or so, the engine compartment is hotter than hell.
I have been under the hood of a lot of different vehicles and have never experienced anything like this. I have noted that a previous owner replaced the radiator and it appears that it is not the correct one. But the Temp guage stays at 175 degrees. I also noted that the vents behind the front wheel wells appear to be for air flow out of the engine compartment. Is my assumption correct? Thank you in advance
The vents behind the front wheels are strictly cosmetic.
As far as engine/cabin heat, it is the nature of the beast. There are many posts about this regarding insulation and heater core bypasses that have been used to lessen it. Unfortunately, stock C3's are like race cars....they get hot.
The vents behind the front wheels are strictly cosmetic.
As far as engine/cabin heat, it is the nature of the beast. There are many posts about this regarding insulation and heater core bypasses that have been used to lessen it. Unfortunately, stock C3's are like race cars....they get hot.
I have not had time to check the timing yet, but the engine seems to be starting and running fine. I will check though. Thanks
The vents behind the front wheels are strictly cosmetic.
As far as engine/cabin heat, it is the nature of the beast.
The vents on the 73' are functional and they do move a lot of hot air as you can feel it when the car is sitting still at idle
I wonder why theyre not functional on later models?
And yes, I agree on it being "the nature of the beast"
As soon as I open the hood after a ride its like... WOW! ...right in your face
The vents on the 73' are functional and they do move a lot of hot air as you can feel it when the car is sitting still at idle
I wonder why theyre not functional on later models?
And yes, I agree on it being "the nature of the beast"
As soon as I open the hood after a ride its like... WOW! ...right in your face
You are right, the hot air escaped, but it was not the designed function of the the vent or "gill", which was strictly for appearance.
If you read some of the Corvette history books that are out there, it states that the gills on the C3 were necessary to relieve under hood pressure. When GM did tests on the car in the design stages prior to production, they encountered aerodynamic lifting of the front end due to air building up under the front end and in the engine compartment. The venting of the heat was an added benefit but I read that the primary reason for the gills was to reduce the lifting effect at speed.
("The Complete Book of the Corvette" by Richard M. Langworth, pages 159, 160, and 161)
Of course, it was also no secret that Bill Mitchell was hung up on the Shark theme and that probably also contributed to the gills but Duntov made them functional to reduce the lifting problem.
Kurt
Back in the day they may have experimented with pressure relief due to their limited knowledge at the time, and hot air probably does make its way out of them, but that is just fluke.
They learned fairly early on that to keep a vette on the ground it required a front air dam. The vents were not ground effects, and they are in the wrong place for that function anyways.
The gills were blocked on the mid year cars so obviously their function was nothing.
Back in the day they may have experimented with pressure relief due to their limited knowledge at the time, and hot air probably does make its way out of them, but that is just fluke.
They learned fairly early on that to keep a vette on the ground it required a front air dam. The vents were not ground effects, and they are in the wrong place for that function anyways.
The gills were blocked on the mid year cars so obviously their function was nothing.
if you look at the aerodynamic test thread, it is pretty obvious that the mid-c3 that did the road testing (74?) experienced a LOT of air evacuation at speed. seems like, whether designed for it or not, the vents are functional.
if you look at the aerodynamic test thread, it is pretty obvious that the mid-c3 that did the road testing (74?) experienced a LOT of air evacuation at speed. seems like, whether designed for it or not, the vents are functional.
Just read the aero test thread. Saw nothing but speculation on ground effects with air dams and increasing the vent opening. I didn't see anything about cooling. There was only one thread there so if I read the wrong one I would be interested in you sending me the link. Theoretically blowers could be ducted out to evacuate hot air. Hot air will escape where ever it can, be it the hood, wheel wells, or any open area, however heat rises so at idle its only going one way without a blower. At speed you may get some small benefit, but in my opinion not enough to justify cutting the opening. You would still have to run ducting or the tires would throw nasty stuff up the side of your car.
Just read the aero test thread. Saw nothing but speculation on ground effects with air dams and increasing the vent opening. I didn't see anything about cooling. There was only one thread there so if I read the wrong one I would be interested in you sending me the link. Theoretically blowers could be ducted out to evacuate hot air. Hot air will escape where ever it can, be it the hood, wheel wells, or any open area, however heat rises so at idle its only going one way without a blower. At speed you may get some small benefit, but in my opinion not enough to justify cutting the opening. You would still have to run ducting or the tires would throw nasty stuff up the side of your car.
All I have to say is......... take a 73,
Close the hood and feel the heat blowing out from the vents.... to me this equals "Functional"
This entire thread is VERY confusing to me
Also, I have read many posts stating that " My air dam is missing and my car is overheating..............
So.. In my opinion the Air Dam is "Functional" as well
All I have to say is......... take a 73,
Close the hood and feel the heat blowing out from the vents.... to me this equals "Functional"
This entire thread is VERY confusing to me
Also, I have read many posts stating that " My air dam is missing and my car is overheating..............
So.. In my opinion the Air Dam is "Functional" as well
Air Dam is totally functional. Totally agree on that. You are right though, this thread has started to become a physics nightmare.
Interesting nevertheless. Time to move on and "Be Cool"
The short answer is, it will be HOT .... very HOT.
Many people put insulation on the interior floors etc. to keep that engine compartment heat out of the interior. Most help only a little, the one that works the best is that ceramic / fiber mat, really expensive though. I have it and it's worth it.
Insulation of one type or another is the best answer to reduce the heat being transferred from the engine compartment to the cab. Comments about insulating the exhaust manifold and exhaust pipes are good ones along with looking into ceramic coated headers. They are a major contributer to excessive engine compartment heat.
I attached a thermocouple to the exhaust manifold after a drive on a summer day last year, here's what you're dealing with:
This is the temperature of the heater/AC box right behind the manifold taken at the same time. The other side of this box has an air duct leading to the cabin. No amount of seals on doors will stop the infiltration of this kind of hot air into the cabin.
I did an engine swap this past winter and installed ceramic coated headers and insulated the firewall with ceramic insulation. It made a dramatic difference, the car is actually fun to drive in the summer!