When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
It's a four speed with 3.36 rear end, 10:1 compression, the new AFR 195 heads, forged pistons, forged steel GM crank, H beam connecting rods. The car will never see a track, I just want nice street performance. I think this cam is about right. Anyone else?
I see that the cam you selected is for a hydraulic roller rocker setup...is that what you are doing...adding a roller cam setup? Or, do you just want a better cam than what was in your L48?
Hopefully, someone with a 71 who replaced their cam will chime in with their thoughts. But, there's also CompCams.com to look at...they have what they call Extreme Energy cams like the 262XE which is decent...or a plain 268H. Some owners that upgradded to the 272 Magnum have some rough idles. On descriptions of cams the idle will start with SMOOTH IDLE which means it actually idles at the required idle speed with good vacuum...around 15inHG. GOOD IDLE means if idles at a higher RPM than the required idle speed and has slightly less vacuum...around 12inHG...you can get these to idle at the required idle speed, but it will be a rough idle. Then there are the cams which don't even list that they idle...the specs have the minimum range at like 2400RPM...which is about where they "idle" at.
I have a brand new Crane 272 Powermax cam and lifter kit if you are interested. It is the hydraulic flat-tappet, if you aren't going with the roller setup. This is supposed to be the largest cam that you can go with without increasing the stall speed.
Yes, I am going to go with a roller set up. I am going to use a different block and save the original numbers matching engine. The block I am going to use has 4-bolt mains and factory bore. The machine shop verified it will clean up at .030 over. I don't need a whole lot of vacuum, as I don't have power brakes.
Also, it's a 4-speed so stall speed isn't an issue.
If you are looking for good street performance, I suggest you go with a cam with 222* - 226* if you want good low end an easy off-idle transition, while still being powerful. The 195 is bigger than what you want - go with the 180. Check out AFR's web page for power curves they show with which head and cam. Most people want too much cam /port for what they really need.
Actually, I meant to say the AFR 180. I'm putting together two engines at once and it gets confusing at times. I just hope none of the Pontiac parts end up in the Corvette!
Check out the GM Hot cam, am running it a 355 in my Formula and it makes loads of torq. I am running 1.5 rockers so the duration is about 2 less on both int and exh.
This hydraulic roller cam is for service only for all V8 engines with roller camshafts. The duration at lash point in degrees (intake/exhaust) is 279/287; duration at .050" tappet lift (intake/exhaust) is 218/228; and maximum lift with 1.6 rocker ratio (intake/exhaust) is 525/525. Valve lash is zero/zero and lobe centerline is 112 degrees.
Check out AFR's web page for power curves they show with which head and cam. Most people want too much cam /port for what they really need.
Look into "real" dyno'd builds to make a choice. That will give you an indication of real life numbers rather than a whole bunch of opinions & theory. Pretty surprising what head & cam combos AFR had dyno'd.
Eddie