When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Can anyone recommend a piston that would be a tad lower compression for regular 91 octane? I spoke with Summit & the one they said was a 9.5:1 & I think that is too low.
My 1968 Motor's Auto Repair Manual lists these big blocks... some are Vette's some are not...
325 HP 10.25 (396)
350 HP 10.25 (396)
375 HP11.0 (396)
385 HP 10.25 (427)
390 HP10.25 (427)
400 HP 10.25 (427)
425 HP 11.0 (427)
430 HP 12.5 (427)
435 HP 11.0 (427)
Of course, the 430 was "derated".
I posted it just for grins... it's from "Motor's"... so who knows.
Note that rated compression ratio is a blueprint spec. Production motors always had lower compression. Normal production tolerances would lower it between 1/2 and a full ratio. So a motor rated at 11:1 would usually be 10:1 to maybe 10.5:1. It will also often have different CRs on the left and right bank!
Note that rated compression ratio is a blueprint spec. Production motors always had lower compression. Normal production tolerances would lower it between 1/2 and a full ratio. So a motor rated at 11:1 would usually be 10:1 to maybe 10.5:1. It will also often have different CRs on the left and right bank!
What configuration was the 385 hp 427? What carb and what size? I am amazed that Chevrolet produced so many different versions of the 427 in 68 and 69. I believe that the 400 hp 3x2 427 is identical to the 390 hp 4x1 427 with the exception of the carbs, air cleaner and intake manifold. Also read that the engine was way over carburated since it used the same cam as the 390 hp which had a single 750 cfm 4V. Any truth in that?
The difference in the 400 and 390 HP is the use of a tri power on the 400. You may be aware of the Berger, Yenko, and COPO 427`s were really 1966 4 bore L72 427`s. And the same L72 is the 1967-69 L71`s as a tri power engine. That L72 really got around.
I believe your thread has been hijacked. Get the head numbers you have and do a search on Mortec or nastyz28 to get the specs on the head. Then it is a combo on the pistons, cam and combustion chamber. Run a compression calculator to get the dynamic compression. This is the number you really want. You probably do not want to exceed 8.3 DCR for 91 octane.
There was 4 427 avail in 68
435 hp trip duece 11 to 1
430 hp 4v 12 to 1
400 hp trip duece 10.25 to 1
390 hp 4v 10.25 to 1
So comp ratio plus CFM carbs made power.
all had different dist curves
There was 4 427 avail in 68
435 hp trip duece 11 to 1
430 hp 4v 12.5 to 1
400 hp trip duece 10.25 to 1
390 hp 4v 10.25 to 1
So comp ratio plus CFM carbs made power.
all had different dist curves
Dont forget the camshaft and heads. Rectangle high hp and oval port. The two high hp engines were solid lifter engines wereas the rest were hydraulic. Oh, I changed the compression on the 430 hp engine for you, it is 12.5-1 not 12-1
Dont forget the camshaft and heads. Rectangle high hp and oval port. The two high hp engines were solid lifter engines wereas the rest were hydraulic. Oh, I changed the compression on the 430 hp engine for you, it is 12.5-1 not 12-1
Well, the pistons that Summit recommended a few months ago when we put it together they told us were 10-1, but come to find out they were actually 9.5 -1. Needless to say when I put it on the dyno to tune it the numbers were sad. Totally castrated muscle car.
I'm looking for a replacement that will do better but stay pump gas friendly. If these are the best we can do & use 91, then so be it, but I thought I would check you you guys to make sure.
Well, the pistons that Summit recommended a few months ago when we put it together they told us were 10-1, but come to find out they were actually 9.5 -1. Needless to say when I put it on the dyno to tune it the numbers were sad. Totally castrated muscle car.
I'm looking for a replacement that will do better but stay pump gas friendly. If these are the best we can do & use 91, then so be it, but I thought I would check you you guys to make sure.
Well the last time I looked at my Vettes and Camaros they had the word Chevrolet on them. No where did it remotely refer to Summit. Any GM dealer could have probably supplied you with the correct parts and you wouldn`t have needed to write this thread. Plus you would have been happy not PO ed. Yes the engine as OEM is 11-1. And 92-93 octane works just fine with those engines.
From: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Originally Posted by zwede
Note that rated compression ratio is a blueprint spec. Production motors always had lower compression. Normal production tolerances would lower it between 1/2 and a full ratio. So a motor rated at 11:1 would usually be 10:1 to maybe 10.5:1. It will also often have different CRs on the left and right bank!
This is absolutely correct. The research I have done for several articles I've done on the subject shows that GM used the "blueprint" cylinder head CC volume for advertised compression ratio. This is the same as the NHRA minimum chamber volume for the Stock classes. Actual production cylinder heads were a full point lower than the advertised comp ratio. In other words, if the engine was advertised with 11:1 comp, the actual, measured comp ratio is around 10:1. The only way you can get to the advertised ratio is to cut the heads down to the NHRA minimum chamber volume, which is the factory blueprint spec.
With this in mind, an actual comp ratio of 9.5:1 is not bad. That would equate to a factory advertised comp ratio of 10.5:1. You can run that on pump gas.
When I took delivery of my 68 L71 roadster about 3 years ago, the seller offered me a gallon can of Tetraethyl lead additive. Not wanting to turn my home into a superfund site, I graciously declined.
In order to run the L71 on the street, I found that a mixture of Torco and Shell Premium, about 1 - 3 ratio worked well to avoid detonation. Also, I had the carbs rebuilt and ensured proper jetting to avoid a leaning out. A 160* thermostat and Water Wetter is another plus, and stick to the conservative side on distributor advance, unless running higher than pump-gas octane.
Also, watch your plugs. If you spend a lot of time just cruising or idling the car, the plugs will foul, causing preignition.
In a pinch, I can run 93* premium, but I have to really loaf the car.
My 1968 Motor's Auto Repair Manual lists these big blocks... some are Vette's some are not...
325 HP 10.25 (396)
350 HP 10.25 (396)
375 HP11.0 (396)
385 HP 10.25 (427)
390 HP10.25 (427)
400 HP 10.25 (427)
425 HP 11.0 (427)
430 HP 12.5 (427)
435 HP 11.0 (427)
Of course, the 430 was "derated".
I posted it just for grins... it's from "Motor's"... so who knows.