Pinging driving me nuts
> checked the EGR, EFE and PVC and this was fine, all where operating and the motor was pulling good vacuum
> checked the timing and it is dead on, and the timing mark is not bouncing around either
> the plug wires, cap and rotor are fairly new including the plugs
the car starts fine and idles fine except for this pinging, the mileage and carb settings are okay to. I just cannot determine why the damn thing pings, but when I start the car up and leave with out warming up, it does not ping. Once I reach operating temp then it will ping.
Is it possible that a bad plug could be the problem ? any Ideas would help. Thanks





good luck henry @ oles
Has this problem occured recently after some mods?
or has it occured randomly....
Do you know the compression ratio of your engine?
If it's a high comp big block rat motor then problem could be as simple as a bad batch of fuel.
What fuel (octane rating) do you usually use....
Just a simple thing to try.....as some gas stations have been known to have bad gas....
Just refill with a quality hi octane fuel and see if there is a difference.
If the tank is full, add some octane booster to elevate the fuel rating.
Driving back from Melbourne one year, I filled up at a country servo with what should have been 95 RON fuel.
Driving through the very best scenic route of Australia (Great Ocean Road) I was struggling with pinging under any load. I had to crawl up hills and coast along sedately till reaching my next fuel stop.
Refilled with good quality fuel, and no ping after that.
I now always keep a bottle of octane booster with me when touring the country regions in case I can NOT obtain premium (high octane) fuel.
PS ( we have a different scaling of our octane rating in Oz...
something to do with US uses average of ron and mon values ???)
[in Oz, 93 ron is lo octane, whilst 95 ron and above is premium.... 98 ron is available at select outlets, and is prefered in performance tunes ]
tom





Also, not all fuels are the same, even with the same octane rating. I'm not going to name names, but there are a couple of major brands out there who take advantage of how octane ratings are averaged here in the US to pump up their numbers. Then, when the heat's on, you end up not getting what you paid for. If you've been bouncing around between different brands, find one that does the job and stick with it.
Ditto, Big2Bird: make sure your plugs are the correct heat range for your application
Last edited by TheSkunkWorks; Apr 17, 2007 at 08:24 AM.
and your reasoning for this statement is......??
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





in MOST, (but not all) cases manifold vacuum will gain you better performance, better fuel economy, lower operating temps, and a better idle characteristic than running off ported vacuum.
Ported vacuum was used for one purpose and one purpose only and that was for lower emission control. They switched from using manifold vacuum to ported vacuum when they started adding all the emission equipment onto the cars because of federal requirements to lower HC outputs.
To that end one of the main things they did to lower HC output was to greatly retard initial timing and raise operating temps and part of the way they did that was to move the vacuum advance off of manifold vacuum to ported vacuum because by using ported vacuum you get no vacuum advance at idle which keeps the initial timing low and keeps the operating temp up. As soon as you crack open the throttle even just a small amount the ported vacuum advance now bewgins to operate the same as a manifold vacuum set-up.
The only difference between manifold vacuum and ported vacuum is at idle, above idle they operate the same.
On manifold vacuum you get full advance at idle and at low loads on the motor as as the load increases the vacuum decreases until you are under full load when there is virtually no vacuum (or very little) in the motor therefore no vacuum advance.
On ported vacuum there is no advance at idle but as soon as the throttle plates open slightly the vacuum advance will be at it's highest level than operates the same as manifold vacuum in that it decreases as the load on the motor increases.
The only real difference between the two systems is at idle.
The vast majority of people find their cars prefer operating using manifold vacuum for the best performance, lower operating temps, best fuel economy, and best idle.
I would suggest two excellent articles that deal with this issue that are well worth the reading:
http://lbfun.com/Corvette/Tech/vette...101Article.pdf
http://lbfun.com/Corvette/Tech/vette..._explained.pdf
Last edited by BarryK; Apr 17, 2007 at 09:07 AM.





edit - agree that manifold vacuum will give better performance (if tolerable without contributing to ping), as port vacuum causes timing to be retarded below optimum. Shouldn't have used the term "never".
Last edited by TheSkunkWorks; May 18, 2007 at 02:31 AM.
Have to agree w/the group on the side of too much advance/too low octane (or the combo between them).
Since the only real difference between a ported vacuum and a manifold vacuum hook-up occurs at idle (no load on the motor) the type of hook-up should will be irrelevant in this situation.
well yes and no, pinging/detonation can and does happen at part throttle. we have seen a lot of cars with vacuum advance induced detonation/ping problems. If the ping goes away when the vacuum advance is disconected the engine needs less advance from the vacuum advance or a vacuum advance that starts at a higher vacuum. henry @ oles
Last edited by RATT7; Apr 17, 2007 at 12:13 PM.
well yes and no, pinging/detonation can and does happen at part throttle. we have seen a lot of cars with vacuum advance induced detonation/ping problems. If the ping goes away when the vacuum advance is disconected the engine needs less advance from the vacuum advance or a vacuum advance that starts at a higher vacuum. henry @ oles
very true, but even part throttle is creating a load on the motor compared to at idle (assuming the car is being driven and not just throttle added while sitting still). That's my point. Under load doesn't always refer to being at WOT. If it was at WOT than the vacuum advance wouldn't be relavent anyway since it wouldn't be part of the equation anymore since there would be virtually no vacuum to create the advance. Part throttle under load is typically and most common since the engine is under load but can still have enough vacuum to create the advance.
Regardless, my ORIGINAL point was simply to wonder why the statement was made that vacuum advance should never be connected to manifold vacuum - everything else has been a sidetract to that actually.
As far as the original posters pinging issue, my first recommendation would be to follow Lars advice and see where the timing is at of course and to make sure it doesn't exceed 36º with the vacuum advance disconnected and plugged and to determine at what point it's all in at. If the timing is at 36º or less and the problem isn't there with the vacuum advance still disconnected that the vacuum advance is most likely the culprit. If the problem still exists with the VA disconnected than he needs to retard the timing back.
If the pinging returns once the VA is reconnected than I'd try a different vacuum can that provides less advance.
very first thing: check fuel quality and if you always refill in the same gas station it's maybe time to go elsewhere...then follow all other advices, if this does not work.











