When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
what you are talking about is known as the spring ratio and wheel ratio, the spring ratio operates at a certain rate vs. the wheel ratio, dependant on the spring position relative to the axis and the force arms applies.
EDIT, I was replying to Stroker before Dr. Phil here interrupted.
Yes...... I know..... but I realize that my 360lbs composite leaf spring will not work with my new rear suspension!!!!
Now is the time to buy some 450lbs (wich is the wheel ratio I have now)coilover system !!!
I don't mind, just post who you are and don't hide behind your brother's handle.
You are grasping mister, I don't know what your problem is but you are derailing the whole conversation and have nothing to add but insinuations and other mindless dribble.
At Stroker, I just installed some Pro Coil over shocks with 450# springs and the shocks are too long in compressed length for the ride height I'm after. I have too little shock travel left and the shock hits the travel indicator (wedged into the coil over hat from fully compressing) before it hits the bump stop (about 3mm difference) Depending on how low you want the car to sit, make sure you choose the right shock and spring.
You'll need either 8 or 6" long springs, any longer and you will not be able to get them installed.
I have to simulate the stroke of my dual wishbone system in the car..... and then I have to select the right coilover..... but I think that I will need something with long stroke and short length when fully compressed...... mha!
My idea was to buy a coilover with max length of 14" and around 10" when compressed..... but the risk is to have to short wheel travel.
You can't get a long stroke short length shock. If you fabricate the mount so it's low enough you can get away with a 5" stroke shock. Anything longer will not fit (unless you mount it like the pics on top, those are carrera shocks and they're either 7 or 9" stroke, not sure)
The short wheel travel isn't really an issue, your wheel won't travel much up and down anyway, you just have to make sure you have as much bump compression as you can and have the shocks extend to their full length without the suspension hanging too low. If you do that, you have shock travel where you don't need it, no sense in having 4" of droop extention. IMO a shock close to 9" collapsed would be ideal. You'd end up with maybe 4 or 5" of shock travel but that should be enough
I agree with you that a long stroke is not mandatory..... but we have to take in consideration the spring ratio.
With a 450 lbs spring and a stroke of 4" the logical ride position should be nearly at alf stroe of the coilover.... the risk is that I may need a progressive spring.... for the following reason:
If my ride is a 2" of stroke, I will have only 900 lbs of dynamic....
A C3 corvette should weigth at the rear some +1500 lbs with full tank and a passenger.... let say 150lbs x 2 of unsprung weigth.... net result is some 600 lbs each spring at ride.
A normal road bump is in the range of 1g of acceleration = more 600 lbs on the spring = nearly 1-3/8" of stroke = only 5/8" of stroke left !!!
I think a progressive spring is the way to go..... !
Do those mount to the stock upper shock mounts? I think I'd be a bit worried about putting the weight of the car on parts that weren't really designed for it.
Don't be aware...... even in normal driving conditions, the BIGGER part of the dynamic load is carried by the shock... specially if you have sport shocks!
A normal road bump at criuse speed can apply a very high acceleration to the whell.... and the shock is the way that force is sent to the frame!
Take a look to the bolts fixing the shock to the frame!
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Originally Posted by V-Twin
Guldstrand did not design the 5 bar, it's a Bob Riley design and originated from the need to correct the horrible toe control of the trailing arm suspension.
To clear this up for me, Riley really came up with this before Dick? Just curious, because I've got Guldstrand catalogs as far back as '80 that include the 5-Bar in it, and wasn't aware it existed very long beforehand.
Getting the upper end of your rear c/o's bolted in must be a PITA, but they look good.
You are grasping mister, I don't know what your problem is but you are derailing the whole conversation and have nothing to add but insinuations and other mindless dribble.
Chill out bubba, we're here to help out each other, at least we try.
Your left halfshaft looks like it's missing a c-clip on the inboard u-joint, might be just the picture though.
There are actually two different 5 bar C2/3 Vette designs out there, Riley did one for Greenwood (the best design) and Guldstrand did another 5 bar (system is OK.) Chevy reportedly tapped Guldstrand to help with C4 rear suspension layout and he did have input on the design.
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Thanks Solid LT1. From what I can tell, the Greenwood setup may not be available(??), but I haven't called to inquire... And yes, I'm told Dick definitely did a bit more on the C4 than just sign off on the appearance of the GS.