C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Edelbrock Top End Package

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 03:13 PM
  #21  
FRSTR90's Avatar
FRSTR90
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 3
From: Springfield Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by foxymophandlpapa
aaaaaaaaaaaah sorry, I though that was the "I agree" sign, not the "bs" flag (my personal favorite). Good, thanks for the heads up. Where are the specs for that cam? Summit doesn't list any of the specs that come with it. Thats why I chose the comp cam that I did.

What do you think of the Comp cam that I selected with that package?
Originally Posted by foxymophandlpapa
aaaaaaaaaaaah sorry, I though that was the "I agree" sign, not the "bs" flag (my personal favorite). Good, thanks for the heads up. Where are the specs for that cam? Summit doesn't list any of the specs that come with it. Thats why I chose the comp cam that I did.

What do you think of the Comp cam that I selected with that package?
Here are the specs for the hydraulic flat tappet Performer RPM cam:
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 234
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 244
Duration at 050 inch Lift: 234 int./244 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration: 308
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 318
Advertised Duration: 308 int./318 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.488 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.510 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.488 int./0.510 exh. lift
Lobe Separation (degrees): 112

As you can tell, it is far from mild. The cam is truely high performance street cam. If you are looking for ***** to wall performance with little maintenance (vs. the solid flat tappet), I assure you that you wont be disappointed. This is not to say it is the most powerful set-up, but a very respectable set-up.

As far as the cam you selected, it will definitely work. I don't have any experience with it, but based off of videos I've seen, it sounds healthy. I think you ought to give the Performer RPM a try, if it is too much cam then I'd fall back on the 286. If you are worried about mileage, the performer RPM cam shoudln't even be an option. Also, if you did go with the performer RPM, make sure you have a good cooling system because it will definitely need it!
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #22  
captainmorgan's Avatar
captainmorgan
Pro
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default

Does anyone have a video or sound clip of a 350 car with this cam in it? I would like to hear how the idle is.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 03:58 PM
  #23  
LeMans Pete's Avatar
LeMans Pete
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 41
From: Raleigh NC
St. Jude Donor '13-'14
Default

Originally Posted by FRSTR90
Here are the specs for the hydraulic flat tappet Performer RPM cam:
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 234
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 244
Duration at 050 inch Lift: 234 int./244 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration: 308
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 318
Advertised Duration: 308 int./318 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.488 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.510 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.488 int./0.510 exh. lift
Lobe Separation (degrees): 112

As you can tell, it is far from mild. The cam is truely high performance street cam. If you are looking for ***** to wall performance with little maintenance (vs. the solid flat tappet), I assure you that you wont be disappointed. This is not to say it is the most powerful set-up, but a very respectable set-up.

As far as the cam you selected, it will definitely work. I don't have any experience with it, but based off of videos I've seen, it sounds healthy. I think you ought to give the Performer RPM a try, if it is too much cam then I'd fall back on the 286. If you are worried about mileage, the performer RPM cam shoudln't even be an option. Also, if you did go with the performer RPM, make sure you have a good cooling system because it will definitely need it!

Ever seen this?:

Intake Duration @ .050 Recommended CR
210 8.5-9.5:1
210-220 9-9.5:1
220-230 10:1
230-240 10.5-11:1
240 and up 11:1 or greater

For an engine thats gonna be ~10:1 compression, both these seem a bit large, which would hurt my low end. Is that table above a little conservative?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 04:27 PM
  #24  
FRSTR90's Avatar
FRSTR90
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 3
From: Springfield Illinois
Default

I've never seen that table. I would say they are a little conservative. My dad's engine measured out to be 10.26:1 compression with the stock 76cc head which actually measured out to be 74cc. Keep in mind, his heads have a lot of work into them and I would bet money they outflow edelbrock's heads. Does this answer your question?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #25  
FRSTR90's Avatar
FRSTR90
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 3
From: Springfield Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by captainmorgan
Does anyone have a video or sound clip of a 350 car with this cam in it? I would like to hear how the idle is.
I wish I could get you a video right now. Unfortunately, he is in the process of installing a DeWitts radiator and he really hasn't had much time to work on the vette.

EDIT: Here is sound clip of edelbrock's cam from their website in a 383: http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_...Camaro2006.mp3

They don't rev it high enough for the engine to really talk to ya, but I think you can get the idea.

Last edited by FRSTR90; Jan 24, 2008 at 04:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #26  
DRIVESHAFT's Avatar
DRIVESHAFT
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 3
From: League City TX
Default

Originally Posted by FRSTR90
Here are the specs for the hydraulic flat tappet Performer RPM cam:
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 234
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 244
Duration at 050 inch Lift: 234 int./244 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration: 308
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 318
Advertised Duration: 308 int./318 exh.
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.488 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.510 in.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.488 int./0.510 exh. lift
Lobe Separation (degrees): 112

As you can tell, it is far from mild. The cam is truely high performance street cam. If you are looking for ***** to wall performance with little maintenance (vs. the solid flat tappet), I assure you that you wont be disappointed. This is not to say it is the most powerful set-up, but a very respectable set-up.
Now compare those numbers with a modern cam with similar .050" #'s. Here are the specs for a Lunati Voodoo cam. Part # 60104

Product Line: Lunati Voodoo Camshafts
Part Type: Camshafts
Cam Style: Hydraulic flat tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range: 2,200-6,400
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 233
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 241
Advertised Intake Duration: 276
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 284
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.504 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.525 in.
Lobe Separation (degrees): 110

Compare the advertised duration numbers. The Voodoo cam is 30° shorter that the generic Edelbrock grind.
It will give all of the top end performance of the Edelbrock cam and MUCH better manners down low.
There is a reason people talk bad about those cams. As cam grinders go, Edelbrock makes great intake manifolds.
Buy your cam from a cam company.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #27  
LeMans Pete's Avatar
LeMans Pete
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 41
From: Raleigh NC
St. Jude Donor '13-'14
Default

Originally Posted by DRIVESHAFT
Now compare those numbers with a modern cam with similar .050" #'s. Here are the specs for a Lunati Voodoo cam. Part # 60104

Product Line: Lunati Voodoo Camshafts
Part Type: Camshafts
Cam Style: Hydraulic flat tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range: 2,200-6,400
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 233
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 241
Advertised Intake Duration: 276
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 284
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.504 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.525 in.
Lobe Separation (degrees): 110

Compare the advertised duration numbers. The Voodoo cam is 30° shorter that the generic Edelbrock grind.
It will give all of the top end performance of the Edelbrock cam and MUCH better manners down low.
There is a reason people talk bad about those cams. As cam grinders go, Edelbrock makes great intake manifolds.
Buy your cam from a cam company.
How does that have much better manners down low? Its got greater lift with more overlap, that would seem to me that it would kill low end power.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 05:22 PM
  #28  
DRIVESHAFT's Avatar
DRIVESHAFT
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 3
From: League City TX
Default

Originally Posted by foxymophandlpapa
How does that have much better manners down low? Its got greater lift with more overlap, that would seem to me that it would kill low end power.

Lift doesnt hurt low speed manners.
The Voodoo has 60° of overlap.
The Edelbrock cam has 89° of overlap.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #29  
FRSTR90's Avatar
FRSTR90
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 3
From: Springfield Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by DRIVESHAFT
Now compare those numbers with a modern cam with similar .050" #'s. Here are the specs for a Lunati Voodoo cam. Part # 60104

Product Line: Lunati Voodoo Camshafts
Part Type: Camshafts
Cam Style: Hydraulic flat tappet
Basic Operating RPM Range: 2,200-6,400
Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift: 233
Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift: 241
Advertised Intake Duration: 276
Advertised Exhaust Duration: 284
Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.504 in.
Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.525 in.
Lobe Separation (degrees): 110

Compare the advertised duration numbers. The Voodoo cam is 30° shorter that the generic Edelbrock grind.
It will give all of the top end performance of the Edelbrock cam and MUCH better manners down low.
There is a reason people talk bad about those cams. As cam grinders go, Edelbrock makes great intake manifolds.
Buy your cam from a cam company.
The cam is meant for high RPMs. I've already stated that. What I am saying is that it is no slouch in the lower-end. I've personally driven the car, I've ridden in the car at speeds above 155 MPH with a TH400 and 3.70. If you do the calculations, that is about 7500 RPMS with a P255/60r15. I know what an engine package like this is capable of.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 05:38 PM
  #30  
DRIVESHAFT's Avatar
DRIVESHAFT
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 3
From: League City TX
Default

Originally Posted by FRSTR90
The cam is meant for high RPMs. I've already stated that. What I am saying is that it is no slouch in the lower-end. I've personally driven the car, I've ridden in the car at speeds above 155 MPH with a TH400 and 3.70. If you do the calculations, that is about 7500 RPMS with a P255/60r15. I know what an engine package like this is capable of.
Nobody said that it didnt work well at high RPM's. They said it was a pig down low.
You may believe it works well, and Im glad your happy with it, but if you havent driven
the same vehicle with a modern cam in it, you dont know the difference.
And by the way, you arent turning 7500 RPM's with that cam either.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 05:49 PM
  #31  
andylmusic76's Avatar
andylmusic76
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota Florida
Default

for most applications i find that too expensive IMHO. you can buy a brand new pair of vortec heads from jegs, a brand new POLISHED aluminum intake manifold from professional products, nice chrome headers on ebay, a nice cam from summit, etc. etc. and it will cost much less...atleast it did for me. i seem to have been getting lucky lately with such good deals
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 05:50 PM
  #32  
FRSTR90's Avatar
FRSTR90
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 3
From: Springfield Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by DRIVESHAFT
Nobody said that it didnt work well at high RPM's. They said it was a pig down low.
You may believe it works well, and Im glad your happy with it, but if you havent driven
the same vehicle with a modern cam in it, you dont know the difference.
And by the way, you arent turning 7500 RPM's with that cam either.
They make a hydraulic roller version that supposedly produces even more power with less overlap. I am sure that cam would be a good cam to install. Please don't come a rip on a cam if you haven't experienced it for yourself. The thread clearly specifies if anyone has had any experience with this cam which I do. BTW- What says the engine wont turn 7500 RPM's?
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 07:50 PM
  #33  
DRIVESHAFT's Avatar
DRIVESHAFT
Drifting
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 3
From: League City TX
Default

The hydraulic roller is a different story. That cam isnt too bad.
A flat tappet hydraulic cam, the size of the the RPM cam just isnt big enough to make power at 7500. HP will peak somewhere around 6000 rpm or so and it will be done by 6500.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #34  
LeMans Pete's Avatar
LeMans Pete
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 41
From: Raleigh NC
St. Jude Donor '13-'14
Default

Originally Posted by DRIVESHAFT
Lift doesnt hurt low speed manners.
The Voodoo has 60° of overlap.
The Edelbrock cam has 89° of overlap.
Well I will admit my stupidity in hopes you'll explain. I thought smaller LCAs gave you greater overlap? Go easy on me
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 09:16 PM
  #35  
GlockGuy's Avatar
GlockGuy
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: ElP TX
Default Trick Flow top end kit

Yesterday I ordered this Trick Flow top end kit with roller cam from Summit. These heads have double valve springs. I found a source for the Comp Cams roller lifters on -bay that saved me about $200.00. I also got zero intererst on the summit card which helped.

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

I also orderd this summit intake:
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...0&autoview=sku

Last edited by GlockGuy; Jan 24, 2008 at 11:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 09:39 PM
  #36  
63mako's Avatar
63mako
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 122
From: Millington Illinois
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

Originally Posted by FRSTR90
They make a hydraulic roller version that supposedly produces even more power with less overlap. I am sure that cam would be a good cam to install. Please don't come a rip on a cam if you haven't experienced it for yourself. The thread clearly specifies if anyone has had any experience with this cam which I do. BTW- What says the engine wont turn 7500 RPM's?
I tend to agree with Driveshaft that there is no way that hydraulic cam can pull 7500 rpm especially in high gear. It is almost impossible to get much over 6000 rpm out of a hydraulic cam without valve float. Maybe 6500 or a little more with a rev kit. Also power will drop off quickly after 6000 RPM just when you are hitting the areodynamic wall. Maybe the speedometer has the wrong gear and is reading incorrectly.

Last edited by 63mako; Jan 24, 2008 at 09:55 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 09:53 PM
  #37  
63mako's Avatar
63mako
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 122
From: Millington Illinois
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

Originally Posted by foxymophandlpapa
Well I will admit my stupidity in hopes you'll explain. I thought smaller LCAs gave you greater overlap? Go easy on me
You are right, the smaller LSA will give you 2 degrees more overlap but the advertised duration is huge on the Edelbrock cam compared to the Lunati. That is where the drastic overlap difference is. The Edelbrock cam has a more gradual ramp rate (old school). The Lunati is a more modern grind with a faster ramp rate. This seems to be the direction the cam companies are moving in and it will pull better power without sacrificing lower end torque. I think the downside of the fast ramp rates are accelerated valvetrain wear. Really think this is one of the reasons you are seeing more wiped lobes in the hydraulic flat tappet cams recently. If you want fast ramp rates, big lift and streetability roller cams are the way to go. JMHO.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Edelbrock Top End Package

Old Jan 24, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #38  
Silver00V6Camaro's Avatar
Silver00V6Camaro
Drifting
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville Alabama
Default

I had it the idle is rough and choppy. Its not that good of a cam does nothing below 3000 rpm.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #39  
LeMans Pete's Avatar
LeMans Pete
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 41
From: Raleigh NC
St. Jude Donor '13-'14
Default

Sorry FRSTR90, but its sounding like the concensus is that that cam is not very good compared to what is available today. I definitely agree with this statement:

Edelbrock makes great intake manifolds. Buy your cam from a cam company.
I'm definitely leaning towards that package, but I'll need to search around for a cam. Those Lunati grind looks good, but I'll try and get some more opinions first. Thanks for the help guys.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 12:19 AM
  #40  
FRSTR90's Avatar
FRSTR90
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,892
Likes: 3
From: Springfield Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by 63mako
I tend to agree with Driveshaft that there is no way that hydraulic cam can pull 7500 rpm especially in high gear. It is almost impossible to get much over 6000 rpm out of a hydraulic cam without valve float. Maybe 6500 or a little more with a rev kit. Also power will drop off quickly after 6000 RPM just when you are hitting the areodynamic wall. Maybe the speedometer has the wrong gear and is reading incorrectly.
Hmmm, it is a little bouncy sometimes. I wasn't the driver, and trying to look across the steering wheel to see the speedometer is a bit of a challange. I would say it was reving atleast 7000.

Where is Millington? Maybe we can get together sometime, and you can see for yourself. I think you'll be quite surprised on how well the engine runs.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE