When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Pretty much requires that you start with an L-82 block since they recommend forged pistons and crank and 4 bolt main. Needs to rev to 6500 to make power and poor low end.
The part number posted was the RPM flat tappet cam package. The hyd roller is a much newer product. Still, I would rather go with a cam company like Crane or Comp and get a cam that fits my style vice having to choose one of two "packages".
Many of these kits assume a 9.0:1 CR to produce the advertised power numbers. You would have to do some additional work to get most C3 engines up to 9.0:1.
guitarcazy,
I got the same engine as you. I haven't really stomped on it cause im not even over 500 miles on the thing. but i have to say i'm a bit dissapointed with what I've seen ,but I think i'm badly in need of a tune up. are you satsified with engine or is that the reason why your looking at a top end kit? I've got a new edelbrock intake/carb, but like i said maybe a tune up is what i need.
guitarcazy,
I got the same engine as you. I haven't really stomped on it cause im not even over 500 miles on the thing. but i have to say i'm a bit dissapointed with what I've seen ,but I think i'm badly in need of a tune up. are you satsified with engine or is that the reason why your looking at a top end kit? I've got a new edelbrock intake/carb, but like i said maybe a tune up is what i need.
I just turned over 1700 miles, and it's just starting to wake up. It ran like crap until about 500 miles, stalling at red lights and such, but it seems to be loosening up with more miles.
Ya, I'm happy with it, but even once it's fully "awake", 290 hp just isn't gonna be enough. The claimed 410 hp sounds tasty. Depends on what you want to do with it. 290 hp is enough to hang with plenty of cars, but 410 will stomp a whole lot more. If it's a cruiser, then what you have will be more than enough. Give it some more miles before you make any decisions.
You're better off getting the parts individually. Edelbrock really only has 2 cams for that type of use - the Performer and the Performer RPM. The Performer is too mild (not much bigger than stock), and the Performer RPM is too big. They do not make a middle-of-the-road cam.
Stay away from that cam in that kit, i had it in my old motor and it sucked. did not make any power below 4k and had to use a 3k stall in the tranny. The cam sounds good but would requre almost 10:1 compression. I was advised by too many people to get rid of that big cam. That cam has an .050 duration of 238/244
Last edited by Silver00V6Camaro; Jan 17, 2008 at 10:33 PM.
That's a whole different can of worms. There are so many different combinations. Overall, the Edelbrock RPM heads are not bad heads. The only real deal breaker in that kit is the cam. You could get the Edelbrocks if you want to go aluminum. If you get the 64cc version, you could bump your compression while you're at it. You could also get the Brodix IK180. You will probably want a cam in the high 210's to low 220's duration for your setup.
I was looking at this exact same kit Edelbrock Top End Kit and was thinking about replacing with this Comp Cam. I have an L-82 bottom end (4 bolt, forged flat top pistons and crank) 4-speed with 3.36 rear gears (or 3.70, can't read second letter very well on case). What would you guys think of this set up?
I was looking at this exact same kit Edelbrock Top End Kit and was thinking about replacing with this Comp Cam. I have an L-82 bottom end (4 bolt, forged flat top pistons and crank) 4-speed with 3.36 rear gears (or 3.70, can't read second letter very well on case). What would you guys think of this set up?
Oh ya, and what do you think of a Holley 4779 sitting on top? Is it a bit too much?
I was looking at this exact same kit Edelbrock Top End Kit and was thinking about replacing with this Comp Cam. I have an L-82 bottom end (4 bolt, forged flat top pistons and crank) 4-speed with 3.36 rear gears (or 3.70, can't read second letter very well on case). What would you guys think of this set up?
I would recommend anyone to go for it. No power below 4k is . The cam has great throttle response with lots of lower-end torque. However, this set up truely shines in the higher rpms. My dad currently has this setup in his L82. The amount of work that has gone in his engine his remarkable and the engine IS the healthiest streetable 350 I've ever seen. He just bought a Holley 4779 to replace the Performer 750 (not sure of the part #). I'd love to answer anyone's questions about this set up. So just shoot me a PM or whatever..
I would recommend anyone to go for it. No power below 4k is . The cam has great throttle response with lots of lower-end torque. However, this set up truely shines in the higher rpms. My dad currently has this setup in his L82. The amount of work that has gone in his engine his remarkable and the engine IS the healthiest streetable 350 I've ever seen. He just bought a Holley 4779 to replace the Performer 750 (not sure of the part #). I'd love to answer anyone's questions about this set up. So just shoot me a PM or whatever..
Its got no power below 4000 rpms but it has lots of low-end torque???
A previous poster said that the Performer RPM cam had no power under 4000, I was just simply stating that it was false. The cam does indeed have lots of low end torque.
A previous poster said that the Performer RPM cam had no power under 4000, I was just simply stating that it was false. The cam does indeed have lots of low end torque.
aaaaaaaaaaaah sorry, I though that was the "I agree" sign, not the "bs" flag (my personal favorite). Good, thanks for the heads up. Where are the specs for that cam? Summit doesn't list any of the specs that come with it. Thats why I chose the comp cam that I did.
What do you think of the Comp cam that I selected with that package?