Problem, mpg way down on '82
some background first,, car is an 82 that I bought last spring with a little over 58k miles. Last summer I took it for its 1st real hiway drive, 160 miles round trip on the NJ Turnpike. Cruise set at 70, a/c on , got 22 mpg w/o so much as a tune up. Didnt do a thing to it till this spring when it started to bog down on acceleration. Did a complete tune-up, plugs, wires, cap, rotor, set tps etc. Still bogged. Replaced fuel pump with a '85, bumped fp to 14 or so, still bogged, checked timing still ng. After exhausting all I pulled a valve cover and discovered what eventually was a wiped cam lobe. Had cam replaced with as close to stock as possible comp cams grind. Car really perked up after that. I also pulled the CAT and replaced with a test pipe. So I'm expecting that since my power is up that my mpg might even be up a tad since the cam was probably going for a while? Well, yesterday took a 160 mile trip this time on the NY state thruway. Used the cruise both ways set at 70, going upstate no a/c, coming down I used the air. I got 16.5 mpg!! Thats a helluva drop. And after doing all that work... The car seems to run fine, only thnig I noticed was the cruise wouldnt hold a steady 70, seemd to bounce around, 73,, 67,, 70 etc. It usually sets about 3 mph higher I just havent gotten around to adjusting the screw on the side of the transducer yet. Also when I pulled the CAT there is an air tube that screws into the cat, I just tied that up to the frame for now, should that be plugged or capped? ANy ideas???/
ESU
ESU
1- O2 sensor can be bad without a CEL?
2- location of O2 sensor, in the exhaust I assume?
3- Terry, what kind of mileage you gettin with your 82?
ESU
Some good suggestions here. I didn't think of the O2 sensor when we talked since those Crossfires are a different breed from mine. Forgot that one. I would try that change first although those O2 sensors can be pricey. PS-Agree you should have put a bigger cam in it when you made the change!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Yes O2 sensors can slowly fail, becoming less and less effective until they get so far gone they throw a code up. My Durango has two of them, and the mileage kept getting worse and worse. finally I ran codes, found nothing, changed the sensors, and the mileage jumped significantly.
I'm not sure where it's located on an '82, but it's not going to be far from the manifolds. You might have to jack up the car, and slide under to find it if no one else knows.
Last edited by Durango_Boy; Sep 2, 2008 at 10:17 PM.





The O2 readings are suppose to fluctuate from 250 Millivolts to 950 Millivolts. The O2 sensor produces a voltage compatible to the O2 content in the exhaust stream. The PCM then adjust the feed back carb to adjust for the rich or lean mixture.
When an O2 sensor goes bad, it will not correctly respond to the O2 content in the exhaust, It will sit at a voltage around 400-500Mv. which will cause the carb to run rich.
You can read the signal wire on the O2 sensor with a Digital voltmeter and actually monitor the O2 sensor operation to see if it is correctly responding to throttle position. If you blip the throttle the exhaust will go rich and the voltage will drop to around 250-300 Mv. If the engine coast down from an elevated RPM the mixture should go lean and the voltage should spike high 800-900 mv.
Over time and miles the O2 sensor gets coated with exhaust deposits or the catalyst wears out and it fails to respond correctly to the change of O2 readings in the exhaust. This failure to respond causes poor performance or poor fuel economy.
It is often difficult to determine if the O2 sensor or the feed back carb is bad. If you artificially richen the mixture by dumping fuel into the carb intake, you should see a rich reading.
Bill C
Bill C
Click on the link below for their site and put crossfire into the search box to see what's available.
http://www.compcams.com/DefaultWide.asp
ESU
ESU
ESU
Thx ESU
ESU
Also, depending on the cam grind, you may have increased power at the cost of mpg... what is the lift/duration on your new cam?
I'd also check all vacuum hoses/systems on your car. If they are all original, you may be losing vacuum. I replaced all vacuum system hoses on my '80 and eliminated alot of gremlins in the process. Same goes for thermal sensors in the intake manifold that the vacuum hoses plumb into... either replace or remove them. I bought ALL vacuum related components from Dr Rebuild. Top notch parts and no regrets!
doesnt the computer adjust injector calibration?? Also I just installed a new o2 sensor 2 or 3 days ago. My mileage as of today is back up to the 22 range like when I 1st bought the car. Also if the o2 sensor is before the cat I dont see how the cat being in or out makes a difference? As for the cam here are the specs:
1987 1989 CHEVROLET 8 GOOD MID-RANGE AND TOP-END PERFORMANCE IN MONTE CARLO SS, CAMARO AND FIREBIRD WITH 305 HO, AND 350 11621-16 I 10751-16 O TRUCKS. (50 STATE LEGAL IN 81-87 CAR AND 81-92 TRUCK, 267-350 APPLICATIONS ONLY. C.A.R.B. E.O. D-19) BASIC RPM 1500-4500
Engine Size Configuration
305 C.I. V
Valve Setting: Intake .000 Exhaust .000 HOT
Lift: Intake @Cam 282 @Valve 423 All Lifts are based
on zero lash and theoretical rocker arm ratios.
Exhaust @ Cam 297 @Valve 446
Rocker Arm Ratio 1.5
Cam Timing: -- @--
Lift: Opens Closes ADV Duration
Intake -- -- 264 °
Exhaust -- -- 274 °
Spring Requirements: Triple Dual Outer Inner
Part Number 99848
Loads Closed 114 LBS @ 1.700 or 1 45/64
Open 297 LBS @ 1.280
Recommended RPM range with matching components
Minimum RPM 1200
Maximum RPM 4800
Valve Float 5400
Cam Timing: TAPPET @.050
Lift: Opens Closes Max Lift Duration
Intake (8) ATDC 32 ABDC 110 204 °
Exhaust 37 BBDC (3) BTDC 110 214 °
Vac was a steady 19 when I bought the car, was 18.5 when I checked it the other day. I checked it right out of the block and then at different points in the routing of the hoses and always stayed at 18.5. I also have used Dr Rebuild and found them to be great, I had a 79 that needed to be redone completely and their products were right on the money.
ESU
Also, depending on the cam grind, you may have increased power at the cost of mpg... what is the lift/duration on your new cam?
I'd also check all vacuum hoses/systems on your car. If they are all original, you may be losing vacuum. I replaced all vacuum system hoses on my '80 and eliminated alot of gremlins in the process. Same goes for thermal sensors in the intake manifold that the vacuum hoses plumb into... either replace or remove them. I bought ALL vacuum related components from Dr Rebuild. Top notch parts and no regrets!
doesnt the computer adjust injector calibration?? Also I just installed a new o2 sensor 2 or 3 days ago. My mileage as of today is back up to the 22 range like when I 1st bought the car. Also if the o2 sensor is before the cat I dont see how the cat being in or out makes a difference? As for the cam here are the specs:
1987 1989 CHEVROLET 8 GOOD MID-RANGE AND TOP-END PERFORMANCE IN MONTE CARLO SS, CAMARO AND FIREBIRD WITH 305 HO, AND 350 11621-16 I 10751-16 O TRUCKS. (50 STATE LEGAL IN 81-87 CAR AND 81-92 TRUCK, 267-350 APPLICATIONS ONLY. C.A.R.B. E.O. D-19) BASIC RPM 1500-4500
Engine Size Configuration
305 C.I. V
Valve Setting: Intake .000 Exhaust .000 HOT
Lift: Intake @Cam 282 @Valve 423 All Lifts are based
on zero lash and theoretical rocker arm ratios.
Exhaust @ Cam 297 @Valve 446
Rocker Arm Ratio 1.5
Cam Timing: -- @--
Lift: Opens Closes ADV Duration
Intake -- -- 264 °
Exhaust -- -- 274 °
Spring Requirements: Triple Dual Outer Inner
Part Number 99848
Loads Closed 114 LBS @ 1.700 or 1 45/64
Open 297 LBS @ 1.280
Recommended RPM range with matching components
Minimum RPM 1200
Maximum RPM 4800
Valve Float 5400
Cam Timing: TAPPET @.050
Lift: Opens Closes Max Lift Duration
Intake (8) ATDC 32 ABDC 110 204 °
Exhaust 37 BBDC (3) BTDC 110 214 °
Vac was a steady 19 when I bought the car, was 18.5 when I checked it the other day. I checked it right out of the block and then at different points in the routing of the hoses and always stayed at 18.5. I also have used Dr Rebuild and found them to be great, I had a 79 that needed to be redone completely and their products were right on the money.
ESU










