When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My vote is for Hooker Competition coated. IMHO none compare in design & quality. As for those that say they're expensive, you usually get what you pay for. :D
My observation of this topic (which has been discussed many, many times over the last year) has been that the Dynomax' seem to be most popular with later model C3 owners with cost as the primary motivator. Hooker's appear to be the favorite mostly for earlier model C3 owners who seem to value design/quality over cost.
1 5/8" for the Dynomax. Great deal. Hooker has a 1 3/4" setup but for over $500 coated, not worth it for me.
The coated Hooker Comps (2456-1) are 1 5/8" ($320), the Super Comps (2134-1) are 1 3/4" ($470). I think this is the issue with comparing Dynos & Hookers. Everyone seems to reference the Super Comps as the Hookers to get. But in reality most should use the Comps with the smaller diameter tubes to maximize torque in their stock or mildly modified engines. The Comps are just under a $100 more than the Dynos which represents the best dollar value IMHO.
Just to throw my .02 in.. I ran Hookers in 70's Mopar street machines and they were tops in my book. No ceramic back then, but dropped right in and never leaked. Quality was great. I'll get Hooker for the Vette when I'm ready. :cheers:
Positive:
The fit is excellent, no clearance problems.
Very easy to install from underside of car.
Much better access to sparkplugs.
Much better routing of plug wires, from above.
No leaks so far.
Negative:
They are made of _very_ thin tubing.
The collector reducer endpiece is angled downwards.
No donut, only gasket, thus the angle cannot be adjusted.
(It might be possible to use a donut, but I couldn't get one that big (3"?) over here.)
If you're interested in performance, be careful about Dynomax. I bought a pair of Dynomax #86008 and returned them because the ports are oval and obstructed the exhaust ports in the heads. Although they're 1 5/8", they're ovallized at the mounting plate and therefore restrict flow. I opted to get my old Blackjack with round ports coated at Jet-Hot and that worked out great. Otherwise, the fit of the Dynomax seemed O.K.
I think if you're under 500hp the Dynomax are fine...I made 445hp to the wheels with them...although we did open up the ports a bit.
If you're interested in performance, be careful about Dynomax. I bought a pair of Dynomax #86008 and returned them because the ports are oval and obstructed the exhaust ports in the heads. Although they're 1 5/8", they're ovallized at the mounting plate and therefore restrict flow. I opted to get my old Blackjack with round ports coated at Jet-Hot and that worked out great. Otherwise, the fit of the Dynomax seemed O.K.
Really? I was looking at my 79 and the a/c bracket is mounted to the manifold. I would think I would maybe need an adapter for the longer bolt? I haven't given it much thought as I'm not ready for headers yet.
The key word there is required. Not required on 77 up a/c w/ any headers, you could add a spacer. I use the a/c bracket to mount a fuel pump heat shield of my own design that I may sell sometime.
Many thanks to all who have replied, I suppose it is a question of longevity & top quality vs: just a good set & price$$$ (the almighty dollar) :yesnod:
Go with your first choice, the powder coated for 200.00. I have used those for years in diffrent cars and they were allways shiny never dulled or discolored. As far as performance, I felt the diffrence. Do not get lured into fancy name brands, These are just as good. :cool:
Go with your first choice, the powder coated for 200.00. I have used those for years in diffrent cars and they were allways shiny never dulled or discolored. As far as performance, I felt the diffrence. Do not get lured into fancy name brands, These are just as good. :cool: