When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
70ZZ3
Thanks for chiming in!
I'd like to make a note of square bore carbs that get good mpg.
22 mpg wTH400/308 is excellent! What was the cruising speed? or RPM
Can u give the List # off the air horn so i could pass along this info?
Matt I got the 22 mpg using the 6210 650 spreadbore Holley. My ZZ crate engine in my 70 is actually a ZZ1, not a ZZ3. I made a typo error long time ago and never changed it. The ZZ1 uses a high rise LT-1 type/design aluminum intake. I believe the ZZ3 intake is a lower profile aluminum intake. I should get my log in name changed to ZZ1.
The good gas mileage was on a trip from San Diego to Dallas in 1975 using the 6210. One thing about my 1970 Corvette, you know how many gallons of gas was used because you can visually see when the gas at the top of the tank. 70 Corvettes have sealed gas caps, so no worry about getting it to full. My turbo 400 and 3:08 geared 1970 Corvette has always had pretty good mileage on trips.
The mileage with the current ZZ crate engine using a Holley 4777 650CFM square bore type double pumper is about 17 MPG using the air conditioner on the last long interstate/highway trip I took driving it. Don't put a lot of intersate miles on the 70 anymore since I perfer the 96 LT4 for interstate/highway trips.
I got it in, and it really does run well. It cruises along nicely and the idle quality is about the same as the qjet. I did notice that the Holley seems to start faster, since I think the gas was syphoning back out of the qjet. So a nice side benefit.
What I really like is the mechanical secondaries. Much better response, and a whole lot easier to chirp the tires. It feels like it runs out of breath earlier, say around 4500rpm, but the response is worth it. Much quicker.
The only other downside is missing the qjet secondaries sound. I do like the sound when those kick in, and the Holley sounds different, though not bad.
The generic bracket from O'Reilly's worked fine. I had to bend up the tang on the front (see in front of the bolt) and the designed location for the cable was too close, so I flipped over one of the kick-down cable brackets. Works great and I now have an adjustable throttle cable (not that I need it).
Bottom line is I would recommend doing the swap for the mechanical secondaries.
shouldn't flatten out at 4500. U R positive it fully opens?
if u can tape a vacuum gauge to the windshield, read vacuum at 4500-5000 WOT in 2nd. If it is over 2-3", keep your eyes out for a 4165-6211 used. the 6211 is 800 cfm. not available new. I just found it in the old catalog, or i would of mentioned it before.
.
I agree w/golden's EFI pick. 8 throttles is an awesome system.
.
70ZZ1
thanks for clearing that up! the 4165 is still on top. 22 mpg is about the best i've read about w/th400. That is a strong, but gas sucking trans.
.
my 1st 4165 did NOT bolt on. i had to buy a qjet manifold and change the manifold. What u guys would like is an "installation kit"
so i think u r real lucky that it bolts right on. There are scores of square bore manifolds that can't use this great carb. An adapter is a bad idea, no room, and can reduce torque & mpg.
Last edited by Matt Gruber; Dec 18, 2009 at 09:53 AM.
[QUOTE=Matt Gruber;1572464416]
shouldn't flatten out at 4500. U R positive it fully opens?
if u can tape a vacuum gauge to the windshield, read vacuum at 4500-5000 WOT in 2nd. If it is over 2-3", keep your eyes out for a 4165-6211 used. the 6211 is 800 cfm. not available new. I just found it in the old catalog, or i would of mentioned it before.
QUOTE]
It fully opens, no question. And it gets up to 4500rpm in a hurry. Had a blast driving it around today. It will chirp the tires in 1st and 2nd, even with the tall M21 and 3.36 rear.
I will check the vacuum as I have a hose long enough for a passenger to watch the gauge. The reality is I spend almost no time over 4500rpm, so it is not much of an issue with me.
However, I will keep an eye out for a reasonably priced 6211 if my vacuum shows high at WOT. I assume it has mechanical secondaries as well? I do not see ever going back to vacuum secondaries.
the 6210-1 uses 2 power valves
6210-2, 6210-3 use 1 PV
if yours has 2, the rear pv will close at high rpm and lean it out for max mpg. this is because it was designed for 327 350 402.
The 454 size makes it think u have let up on the gas
and it goes into economy mode
the solution is to install a plug in just the rear PV, and use .089 max jets.
.
solution #2
the rear venturi is 1 23/32 on the 6211
but only 1 3/8 on the 6210
if u have a dremel grinder i'd go halfway between the 2, enlarge the rear venturi by 0.170" this would give u 725 cfm and should cure it. Larger may cause problems unless a carb porter does it and may hurt throttle response. I'd pick up a spare carb to experiment as there is some risk, but the cores are cheap.
I have the 6210-3. I went with the -3 because the different pictures on ebay showed the -3 with the shorter linkage to the secondaries. Not sure it is any better, I just figured shorter would have less play.
So one power valve.
Solution #2 is beyond my comfort level. I like to bolt parts on, and if it is not an improvement I can usually recoup my spend by reselling on ebay.
I am going to start another thread to see how other '74 454 rev. Is it really that free of a reving engine? I think my experience is more of a function of the 6210 already having the secondaries wide open by 4500rpm where the qjet top plates are just starting to open the rest of the way up.
There were several other WOT runs, and the vacuum always went to 0-1 or close. So I am thinking the 6210 is good for the car. Sure gives it a lot of snap.
The car gets to 70 (about 4500rpm in 2nd) in a hurry but I had to be pretty deliverate to run it to 5600rpm. What roscobbc wrote regarding his experience with his L36 seems to be on the money with what I am experiencing.
Bottom line is I am happy with my combination, and I would recommend the 6210.
Paul,
If you are still having "My Q-Jet has an off-idle stumble that all the Lars papers in the world (and I) cannot seem to resolve.", check that the centrifugal weights in the dist. are moving freely.
Paul,
If you are still having "My Q-Jet has an off-idle stumble that all the Lars papers in the world (and I) cannot seem to resolve.", check that the centrifugal weights in the dist. are moving freely.
90% of "carb" problems are actually ignition issues.
Still amazes me that people forget that there is a perfectly good 750 cfm mechnical secondary carb out there that is known to deliver 20 mpg. It is called a Quadrajet. Q-Jets are not vacuum secondary, they have mechanical secondaries with a demand actuated air valve.
if u
1. floor it in turns
2. or on ice
3 or in the rain
VS will apply power more slowly and could keep a novice driver from frying the tires and going out of control.
it is like a built in nanny watching your every move, and saying NO U CANT FLOOR IT SO FAST
Hi Matt....I need a carb for my 69 350/350 ...spread bore...do you have a spare you could sell me...?? Rick in sebastian 772 643 5283 are you going to old town for the ncrs meet ? thanks
Still amazes me that people forget that there is a perfectly good 750 cfm mechnical secondary carb out there that is known to deliver 20 mpg. It is called a Quadrajet. Q-Jets are not vacuum secondary, they have mechanical secondaries with a demand actuated air valve.
yes but the number of people out there that can fix, service, repair, or rebuild these things are going down so fast that if yours is broke then its not going to get fixed easily.
yes but the number of people out there that can fix, service, repair, or rebuild these things are going down so fast that if yours is broke then its not going to get fixed easily.
Very true! And finding a good core to rebuild aint what it use to be either!
yes but the number of people out there that can fix, service, repair, or rebuild these things [qjets] are going down so fast that if yours is broke then its not going to get fixed easily.
Originally Posted by 71coupe454
Very true! And finding a good core to rebuild aint what it use to be either!