When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hi there Van Steel
Do you know what bolt length comes standard with the VBP springs?
And ditto with the Hyperco/LiteFlex units?
Do you (or anyone) know what year GM switched over to the composite springs?
We are just trying to determine who is high - and by how much overall.
So far only Andrew from Muskegon (TRW spring) has come in to help.
-W
All VBP springs need 8" bolts.
With the Hyperco springs, we always include 8" bolts. I have installed the EZ Ride springs on the heavier year cars 75-79 & used the stock bolts. All Hyperco springs are built to stock spring rates + 10%. So a steel 9 leaf is 180#'s. The EZ Ride is 198#. The 7 leaf is approx 295#'s and the Hyperco spring is 330#'s and it's mold has less arch.
The VBP & Hyperco spring are made completely different from one another. The VBP springs are made 5 at a time as to the Hyperco & TRW spring are made indivually.
I don't really see the issue with using 8" Bolts. We recommend you cut off what you don't use under the nut. Just leave 1/2" - 3/4" of thread. With a 15" rim, you might be close if you get a flat. If the bolt is cut it should be fine. All other size rims will have no issues with the 8" bolts as the barrell is larger.
I think your right and if you were happy with your ride height it appears , from the position of the nut you had the option to go up OR down. Nice !
Roger,
That's my former 1979 L-82 that I drove for many years. I sold it to my younger Brother in 2003 when I bought my 1967.
The VBP spring job (#330) was done two years ago. There was no problem with ride height (see pic). That's what perplexes me about these spring threads: some cars are fine and some are much too high (but never too low!). It's a mystery....
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Originally Posted by paul 74
I am happy with the stock configuration. No mods needed for a Sunday afternoon cruiser. I often wonder why people try to "improve" their car beyond what GM engineers designed??
Try? If you're happy with your C3 as it came from the factory good for you, but to imply that there's no room for improvement on 40+ year old design and engineering isn't a credible argument.
Quote from Roger
I think your right and if you were happy with your ride height it appears , from the position of the nut you had the option to go up OR down. Nice !
Roger,
That's my former 1979 L-82 that I drove for many years. I sold it to my younger Brother in 2003 when I bought my 1967.
The VBP spring job (#330) was done two years ago. There was no problem with ride height (see pic). That's what perplexes me about these spring threads: some cars are fine and some are much too high (but never too low!). It's a mystery....
I would have to say the problem follows the TRW springs. Yours looks good and the nut appeared to be right in the middle of the adjustment,most of these guys would probably kill to have there car sitting like yours and have the option to go lower. I personally won't buy a TRW because I have removed too many for height issues. JMO
Try? If you're happy with your C3 as it came from the factory good for you, but to imply that there's no room for improvement on 40+ year old design and engineering isn't a credible argument.
My comment was related to Sunday afternoon cruising. Obviously, if you wish to autocross then modifications are necessary.
I am happy with the stock configuration. No mods needed for a Sunday afternoon cruiser. I often wonder why people try to "improve" their car beyond what GM engineers designed??
Paul? Aren't you using a fiberglass spring yourself? If so what brand?
And you DO realize that it was GM engineers that first introduced the composite spring for the Vette - right?
Even for just street cruising... there's about $1k that GM didn't spend that outta be spent just to "tighten everything up". (Unless you need NCRS type original)
-W
Last edited by Clams Canino; May 28, 2010 at 01:22 PM.
Paul? Aren't you using a fiberglass spring yourself? If so what brand?
And you DO realize that it was GM engineers that first introduced the composite spring for the Vette - right?
Even for just street cruising... there's about $1k that GM didn't spend that outta be spent just to "tighten everything up". (Unless you need NCRS type original)
-W
Yes, I am running the TRW, and it works great... a wonderful improvement in both ride quality and performance. that is as long as it is matched with Bilstine Sport shocks. Without thoes shocks, it bounces like a buggy....BUT, I still had to run the 10" bolts.... and that is BS....
Paul? Aren't you using a fiberglass spring yourself? If so what brand?
And you DO realize that it was GM engineers that first introduced the composite spring for the Vette - right?
Even for just street cruising... there's about $1k that GM didn't spend that outta be spent just to "tighten everything up". (Unless you need NCRS type original)
-W
No, I use the nine-leaf steel spring with 6" bolts and plain old Monroe Gas-Matic shocks..
Yes Sir; I wish to Thank both Van Steel & Muskegon for their help in these two Threads. I am sure happy to know, that the majority of the Composite springs, Sold, are made in the U.S.A.. Have a great weekend, Thanks for our freedom, provided by our service men & women. Gene
Guess he wasn't as satisfied with the stock configuration as he thought...
You can poo-poo my efforts to keep my old 1974 a safe vehicle. Have fun with yours. This is what I started with. Note that Bubba has the bolt upside down.
I really have problems with people who want to buy $5,000 project cars. That pic shows just the beginning of the misery they face.
Have a look. This is a quiz. What is wrong with this picture? Yes, this is what I found when I first pulled that wheel off in 2008 just after I bought the car. Bubba loves these vehicles.
You can poo-poo my efforts to keep my old 1974 a safe vehicle. Have fun with yours.
We are not poo-pooing your efforts - we are poo-pooing you. Rather your snobbery in particular about we people who upgrade our suspensions. And now I poo-poo you for implying it's not safe to do what we do. Don't be such a Nana-tool.
Originally Posted by paul 74
I really have problems...
I understand you do.... Here, try this....
-W
Last edited by Clams Canino; May 29, 2010 at 09:34 AM.