Exhaust H-Pipe Placement question?
I remember seeing some information about this several months ago.
What is the best location to install an H-pipe? Or does it not really matter?
Place close to the headers, meaning 15-18 inches from the collectors or would further back provide more benefit?
I have location about 15 inches after the collectors and then I got another 8 inches or so to work with further back right after the cross member.
Basically I can install before the crossmember or right after.
Thanks,
I remember seeing some information about this several months ago.
What is the best location to install an H-pipe? Or does it not really matter?
Place close to the headers, meaning 15-18 inches from the collectors or would further back provide more benefit?
I have location about 15 inches after the collectors and then I got another 8 inches or so to work with further back right after the cross member.
Basically I can install before the crossmember or right after.
Thanks,

Rick B.
I am thinking of putting if after the cross member, ie. further away from the Trans.
Bob, also good point about the trans heating up. I guess the further back away from the headers the cooler they get.
I will post some pics early next week if and when I get it completed.
But, once the exhaust flow is cooled that much, I'm not sure how much real benefit there is for either arrangement.
I have heard that the sound of an "H" pipe setup is a bit different from that of an "X" pipe arrangement...but I don't know what that difference is.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Good point about all the bends with an x. Looks like some of the guys have mandrel bent tubing which looks great but cost some big $$$. I am installing 3 inch exhaust and the regular bend method is tuff in those tight areas espcially coming up around the rear spring to the mufflers.
Good point about all the bends with an x. Looks like some of the guys have mandrel bent tubing which looks great but cost some big $$$. I am installing 3 inch exhaust and the regular bend method is tuff in those tight areas espcially coming up around the rear spring to the mufflers.
When I priced it out, this was cheaper than buying/putting together a commercially available system and I knew that everything would match up and align.
When I priced it out, this was cheaper than buying/putting together a commercially available system and I knew that everything would match up and align.

No, it's on a '64 so there are no smog requirements/inspections. CA exempts pre-'66 from smog requirements entirely and no inspections for smog for vehicles earlier than '76.
Last edited by toddalin; Oct 10, 2010 at 07:00 PM.
I initially fitted a twin 2.5" stainless system with an X-pipe and with some very free flowing straight through style mufflers. I could notice a performance improvement. But there was a drone created with that system... with a resonating vibration from 1000 to 2500 rpm which was completely intolerable.
And with the X-pipe, my 68 C3 sounded like a late model LS1 with a single pipe system. I didn't like it at all.
Off came the X-pipe and free flowing mufflers, and on went a 2.5" system with reverse flow Turbo mufflers without any balance pipe.
A slight decrease in performance (noticed by the butt-ometer) but drone was minimised almost completely, with only some resonance between 1200~1300 rpm.
BUT the vette sounded like a mean 60's muscle car again.
I then fitted an 2.5" H-pipe just after the trans crossmember, and the intensity of the resonance reduced more, and now is just noticeable between 1250~1300 rpm. It's narrow enough and low enough in the rpm band that it is no longer an issue.
The H-pipe subdues the significant burble from each pipe slightly, but it still sounds like a 60's muscle car.
Like I said.... sound is a subjective topic.
Have a listen to a few cars with the type of system you are considering before parting with your cash.























