When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
don't understand why GM doesn't just make the same exact head, just out of aluminum, instead of cast iron. They'd sell about a gazillion of 'em.
Make em just a little bigger, better flowing too.
On tires, a sticky 15" tire will always hook better than the 17.
Tons of tires available to do this with and 15s are cheap.
Stiffer the sidewall easier they will spin.
They flow better than most Tier I heads...but they do make bigger ones. I don't think we'll see an aluminum Vortec from GMPP, but you never know. There are a lot more options in aluminum heads when we start getting into bigger budgets and flow numbers.
There are two iron Bowtie Vortec heads - the "small port" with 185cc intake runners (P/N 25534421) and the "large port" with 225cc intake runners (P/N 2553446). I haven't looked at tested flow numbers but GMPP claims 285 CFM @ .600 lift for the large port heads. I haven't worked with either of these, but I'd love to use either on a 383 build.
Cool article and good information. I thin the deck was stacked against the Vortecs a bit with the cam and the torque converter issues as well as the displacement - On a 350 with a .450 lift cam (within the Vortec limits) and a tight torque converter (which is what most folks have) we'd have seen what the Vortecs can do in their "sweet spot" and the results would have been much closer. 7 HP and 20 TQ for about $300 or so...tough call.
I had to chuckle a bit at the center bolt valve covers being "significantly more expensive" - I get take-offs on fleabay for about $20/set at most
Some are just stuck in the past. We run VORTEC heads on every chevy motor upgrade at our shop. The Vortec heads have a better seal for valve cover, and a better intake manifold seal. Self alighning rockers are no problem either. If you have a head which is wooped and needs rebuilt, the original rockers are worn out also. The only real increase in cost is the intake manifold change. Al
Some are just stuck in the past. We run VORTEC heads on every chevy motor upgrade at our shop. The Vortec heads have a better seal for valve cover, and a better intake manifold seal. Self alighning rockers are no problem either. If you have a head which is wooped and needs rebuilt, the original rockers are worn out also. The only real increase in cost is the intake manifold change. Al
It's amazing. Some of the posts you see by folks who have never used a pair, but are ex-spurts on them based upon a single article in a magazine which changed half a dozen things at a time and then claim it's this or that product that made the difference according to the advertizing sold that month.
We run VORTEC heads on every chevy motor upgrade at our shop. The Vortec heads have a better seal for valve cover, and a better intake manifold seal. Self alighning rockers are no problem either. If you have a head which is wooped and needs rebuilt, the original rockers are worn out also. The only real increase in cost is the intake manifold change. Al
...and if someone is doing a complete top then the intake is a wash as well.
We keep at least one complete top end kit in stock, Heads, rockers, push rods, intake and valve covers. Oh yea, all Vortec. In the summer months I keep ZZ4 rotating assy in stock as well, winter we always have enough time to place an order. Our customers want turn key and go performance. That is what we strive to supply. I should note we are in the Marine business. Al
They flow better than most Tier I heads...but they do make bigger ones. I don't think we'll see an aluminum Vortec from GMPP, but you never know. There are a lot more options in aluminum heads when we start getting into bigger budgets and flow numbers.
There are two iron Bowtie Vortec heads - the "small port" with 185cc intake runners (P/N 25534421) and the "large port" with 225cc intake runners (P/N 2553446). I haven't looked at tested flow numbers but GMPP claims 285 CFM @ .600 lift for the large port heads. I haven't worked with either of these, but I'd love to use either on a 383 build.
Interesting note on the new Vortec Bow Ties - they have a dual bolt pattern so you can run a Vortec intake (8-bolt) or a classic 12-bolt.
My take on the Vortecs has been if you have big power dreams, which a lot of people seem to, that it's best to pass them by. I've heard way too many "I want 300+rwhp and here's my plan:" with Vortec heads being part of the equation and it's just not worth it. I'd rather go with a better flowing head and not have to have as wild a cam to push the power through.
However, if you're just looking for a strong runner (250-300 crank HP) and honestly know you won't have a strong taste for more (who actually knows that?) - I think they have a good solid place. Especially in a cruiser.
they have a dual bolt pattern so you can run a Vortec intake (8-bolt) or a classic 12-bolt.
"I want 300+rwhp and here's my plan:" with Vortec heads being part of the equation and it's just not worth it. I'd rather go with a better flowing head and not have to have as wild a cam to push the power through.
Yeah, the dual-pattern is nice, but the price of the heads is a bit steep - getting into $600-$700 each makes me start looking at AFRs
I don't understand that concept of a needing "as wild a cam" - a head will only flow what it will flow regardless of the cam used. A Vortec 355 will absolutely make 300 RWHP (or around 1 FWHP/CID) or a small bit better with a very streetable cam (I've built a bunch)...but I agree that's as far as it's going to go. Buying more flow and then using a too-small cam leads to a "lazy" engine with poor low-speed throttle response.
Design is always around the heads; flow determines how much power the engine will make, the cam is selected to maximize the capabilities of the head and RPM range where we want the power, and the shortblock is built to support the power level.
For a lot of folks budget is a lot more of a driver than power levels. I get a lot of builds where the owner starts out wanting a 500 HP screamer...and ends up with a mild 383 making around 1 HP/CID
Over the years I've found that 1HP/CID number to be just about perfect for most street-going engines - the cost goes up geometrically after that figure and the street manners start to drop a bit.
I don't understand that concept of a needing "as wild a cam" - a head will only flow what it will flow regardless of the cam used.
Of course not - you're an engine builder. There's still a strong contingent of people who live on HP numbers and don't give a damn about average power, torque at low RPM, etc. They just want to slap down a sheet somewhere that says xxxRWHP. (*edit* but they don't want to spend the $$ to do it the right way...)
Part of the problem with my perspective is living in a (the?) smog-state, so I try to think about builds with cam timing <230*.
Many people (even here) consider a cam in the 230s to be mild.
Last edited by Shark Racer; Nov 18, 2011 at 11:57 AM.
Of course not - you're an engine builder. There's still a strong contingent of people who live on HP numbers and don't give a damn about average power, torque at low RPM, etc. They just want to slap down a sheet somewhere that says xxxRWHP. (*edit* but they don't want to spend the $$ to do it the right way...)
Part of the problem with my perspective is living in a (the?) smog-state, so I try to think about builds with cam timing <230*.
Many people (even here) consider a cam in the 230s to be mild.
One word .......BRODIX, do it once and do it right.
Of course not - you're an engine builder. There's still a strong contingent of people who live on HP numbers and don't give a damn about average power, torque at low RPM, etc. They just want to slap down a sheet somewhere that says xxxRWHP. (*edit* but they don't want to spend the $$ to do it the right way...)
As said the Vortecs are a great budget street head for decent torque.
Problem is too many give them credit for being something they are not which is a big hp builder. They just arent put together for that no matter what some mag article says
yet youll see so many convince someone they can get a big # anyways only to see the poster pissed 2 mos later that hes dissapointed in the way it runs cause someone told him to mismatch everything in quest of big power on the cheap
....and many do not flow the #s out of the box you read about those seem to get inflated too. Had a few on the bench to prove that one wrong.
Nice torque upgrade from stock/$ spent...thats about it.
But they are new, GM quality theres something to be said about that.
Care to post your flow numbers? I have as well and found them quite consistent. I'm lucky to have a great machine shop that only charges around $50 for one cylinder.
There seems to be a bunch of confusion here over these heads - at 1 HP/CID or thereabouts I have yet to see a better choce. Beyond that, no.
The folks that are really causing trouble are the ones selling "upgraded" heads that offer lift way beyond what the head will flow at.
As said the Vortecs are a great budget street head for decent torque.
Problem is too many give them credit for being something they are not which is a big hp builder. They just arent put together for that no matter what some mag article says
yet youll see so many convince someone they can get a big # anyways only to see the poster pissed 2 mos later that hes dissapointed in the way it runs cause someone told him to mismatch everything in quest of big power on the cheap ....and many do not flow the #s out of the box you read about those seem to get inflated too. Had a few on the bench to prove that one wrong.
Nice torque upgrade from stock/$ spent...thats about it.
But they are new, GM quality theres something to be said about that.
I agree, seems the numbers jump around, not only in articles, but in the more technical forums, various head porters seem to be anywhere from low 220's to the high 230's. Maybe the confusion is an upgraded head vs a stock/new casting? A 2.02 with a good valve job might bring the heads in at the 230/240 mark?
Bowtie Vortecs have a dual pattern? What standard pattern intake has vortec style ports to match runners up? Standard short and wide intake runner will conflict with a tall and narrow vortec runner.
Bowtie Vortecs have a dual pattern? What standard pattern intake has vortec style ports to match runners up? Standard short and wide intake runner will conflict with a tall and narrow vortec runner.
I understand the HEAD has the dual pattern. What standard pattern INTAKE has vortec ports so they don't mismatch? Meaning, so the ports don't mismatch....