Cylinder Head Question
I now see your "ace in the hole" to argue your point always!
Not everybody has a dyno down the street.
How about time slips from where it matters, the "RACE TRACK".
You can have a 500 horse engine but if its in a 1 ton farm pickup your not going to be fast, so who cares what the dyno says?
If all a person is going to run is a 450 lift cam they might as well run a set of $300 heads off the machine shop shelf, instead of buying vortecs, self aligning rockers, valve covers and an intake.
If you want, I will look it all up and give a price run down.
And im not talking about yard sell parts you always seem to find billa.
The heads belong to wesmigletz
I had them flowed at QMP racing in Chatsworth Ca.
I flow at least 1 cyl after doing a set same as billa.
They were stock valved (have to double check the #..906???)Vortecs
Ive read people claiming they are in the 240cfm stock which is horse....
Ported with stock valves/pre valve job they went 240something 180ish if Im not mistaken 20+cfm gain. Not huge but youll only get somuch through a small valve. Id have to get the sheet to get real accurate info it was about 1 yr+ back. They usually have my stuff on a computer file, wes has the only sheet and hes deployed.
Now out of the box better than
Camel humps
L98/ZZ4 113
LT1
But looking for power/top end look for another head to use imo.
Last edited by cv67; Nov 19, 2011 at 10:42 AM.
Tim, I think what you're saying is that it doesn't matter how much power you make if it's not in a fast car, and the only place to do engine design is at the dragstrip. I'll disagree with both comments
Most street GEN I SBC flat-tappet builds are going to use cams right around .450 lift as it's the "sweet spot" for a very streetable engine that still makes outstanding power. The idea that a better head won't make use of that level of lift just doesn't make any sense as the more a head flows at a given lift, the more power it will make.
Tim, by all means - as an example please post your parts list for the "top" of L-48 that will make 1HP/CID using any combo you like and let's compare costs. That's a useful contribution
Turning to flow, cuisinartvette what was the configuration for the flow tests? Out-of-the box Vortecs have consistantly come in at the mid- to high- 230's intake with a clay radius. I generally estimate about 30% intake loss for a low-rise dual-plane like the Performer, which still means the heads can and do easily deliver 1 HP/CID at the flywheel. Lower numbers typically indicate that the heads were flowed with an intake tube, which replicates the intake loss to some extent - but this approach typically isn't used for published numbers as it's difficult to compare as there's no standard for the tube and it typically models at best a high-rise single-plane.
What I push back on is the continuing apples and oranges comparison here - the concept seems to be that folks are going to be disappointed with around 1HP/CID so Vortecs just aren't worth considering, which makes no sense to me as most folks have never felt 1HP/CID and once they do they're always pretty happy.

Again, they're not "swiss knife" heads that do everything well like AFR 195's - but they remain the very best value and performance for a moderate "top" and virtually every build targeting around 1 HP/CID.
Need to get out into the shop today to assemble some Chad Golen-ported aluminum LT1 heads; maybe I'll take my armchair out there to be comfortable ;-)
Last edited by billla; Nov 19, 2011 at 12:24 PM.
Last edited by billla; Nov 19, 2011 at 03:42 PM.
Dollar for dollar if vortecs aren't enough power for someone in the first place why even start with them?
I would rather have something to build on that a stopping point like vortecs.
And I disagree with you that people start with a cam around 450 lift, maybe for mom's grocery getter/soccer van.
You can put a Comp Magnum 470/270 in an all stock engine and it will run just fine, been there done that!
By the way - awful cam for stock heads, as it's single pattern whereas most stock heads have relatively poor exhaust flow...so most modern GEN I SBC cams are dual-pattern to add exhaust lift and duration to offset the limitations and improve the I/E ratio.What cam are you running, Tim?
Isn't a CompCams Magnum 270 "around" .450 lift? Are you really getting pissy over .020?
By the way - awful cam for stock heads, as it's single pattern whereas most stock heads have relatively poor exhaust flow...so most modern GEN I SBC cams are dual-pattern to add exhaust lift and duration to offset the limitations and improve the I/E ratio.What cam are you running, Tim?
What do I run? A Comp Cams of course, and yes I have the spec card.
It was in the rear compartment when I bought the car, no I didn't put the cam in it the previous owner did when the engine was rebuilt, he is a stockcar driver so thats why the strange numbers and kind of mild for my taste but the headlights work good with it.
Manufacturer's Part Number 12-322-4
Product Line COMP Cams Specialty Camshafts
Cam Style Hydraulic flat tappet
Duration at 050 inch Lift 228 int./236 exh.
Advertised Intake Duration 276
Advertised Exhaust Duration 284
Advertised Duration 276 int./284 exh.
Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio 0.474 int./0.474 exh.
Lobe Separation (degrees) 110
Grind Number CS 276AH-10
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Any GEN I SBC intake will match up the ports - dual-plane for sure.














