When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
This seems to be a great price for a great carb, and an instant performance increase.
A factory refurbished new carb for the price of a used one is nice.
A little tip, if you offer 10.00 below the asking price they will take it. There were nine of these when I first looked earlier this afternoon. 5 as of this writing.
Hmmmm.... 670 cfm for the Holley; 750 cfm for the Q-Jet.
Now, in reality, your engine will not even need the 670 cfm that the Holley provides. But, the Q-Jet will regulate itself for whatever the engine needs. What about that Holley???
Hmmmm.... 670 cfm for the Holley; 750 cfm for the Q-Jet.
Now, in reality, your engine will not even need the 670 cfm that the Holley provides. But, the Q-Jet will regulate itself for whatever the engine needs. What about that Holley???
Not to mention that the smaller primaries on the Q-Jet (~250cfm vs ~330 cfm) will have better throttle response at low speed.
Outside the brand debate hard to go wrong with those on your link..plus backed up by Holley. Most Im betting were bolted on never fine tuned and deemed "bad".
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by 7T1vette
...."performance increase"....
Compared to what? A Quadra-Jet?
Hmmmm.... 670 cfm for the Holley; 750 cfm for the Q-Jet.
Now, in reality, your engine will not even need the 670 cfm that the Holley provides. But, the Q-Jet will regulate itself for whatever the engine needs. What about that Holley???
I guess we need to use the "formula" for this one Lars ran an 1150 Domintor on a warmed over 350ci. That said I would never buy a used carb, how much do you think they pay the guy that rebuilds them, I have rebuilt several Holleys when I was younger and they never seem to run right, I usually put them on Ebay and use the money I get to get a brand new one
Last edited by MotorHead; Apr 5, 2013 at 11:25 PM.
I know that this question should not be asked, but I am..... with the QJ what do we expect for mpg running a 350/ auto / 1973. With the 650 Eldebrock I was only getting10-12 mpg and that was Sunday driving. Would be interested in knowing what everyone is getting. Chime in you all! Thanks
They don't like shipping to Canada. Many vendors do not. The cost to my postal code is $96.30.
Makes sense, especially because I can't imagine someone not liking you.
(I knew the reason, it was just a light-hearted jab at Wayne)
Originally Posted by manofsteel1
I know that this question should not be asked, but I am..... with the QJ what do we expect for mpg running a 350/ auto / 1973. With the 650 Eldebrock I was only getting10-12 mpg and that was Sunday driving. Would be interested in knowing what everyone is getting. Chime in you all! Thanks
The Quadrajet will "do better". Perhaps by a MPG or two, but not a lot.
back in the gas crises in the 70's i took the stock holley 3310 off my LT-1 and put a good quadrajet on. my mileage did not get better and put the holley back on. throttle opening is throttle opening.
My '71 SB with Turbo 400 auto got around 15-16 overall mileage with the Q-Jet (properly set up). Once I swapped the 400 out for a 700R4, I'm getting around 20 mpg on the highway. I'm sure city mileage is better too, as lockup is working after 2nd range shifts.
I think a 'healthy' SB with Q-Jet will get around 15 or so. A lockup clutch ('81 I believe) will gain 10%. Overdrive tranny will gain another 20%.
back in the gas crises in the 70's i took the stock holley 3310 off my LT-1 and put a good quadrajet on. my mileage did not get better and put the holley back on. throttle opening is throttle opening.
I'm assuming you tuned both carburetors so that they were putting out identical AFR for your back to back test, and ran this over a number of gas tanks to avoid vapor variances?
We just bought a SA Holley refurbish. Really, never been installed. Not a mark on the base or anywhere. Anywho, I double checked the jetting, primary's are 65's and secondary's are 68's. I remember Lars recommends to richen the jetting by 3 steps. Thus put the 68's in front order some 71's for the back. We buy alot of replacement Holleys for our Marine engines. I always double check the refurbish site and start offering $30 below asking price. Good luck Al
Hmmmm.... 670 cfm for the Holley; 750 cfm for the Q-Jet.
Now, in reality, your engine will not even need the 670 cfm that the Holley provides. But, the Q-Jet will regulate itself for whatever the engine needs. What about that Holley???
Could someone explain to me how a Q-Jet regulates itself for what the engine needs versus other brands of carburetors?
From: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Originally Posted by jabrun
Could someone explain to me how a Q-Jet regulates itself for what the engine needs versus other brands of carburetors?
I have a complete section in my Q-Jet paper dealing with the operation and control of the secondary system on the Q-Jets. E-mail me if you need a copy.
Could someone explain to me how a Q-Jet regulates itself for what the engine needs versus other brands of carburetors?
Well, a Q-jet doesn't really "regulate itself", but it is a very easy operation to adjust when the secondary air valve opens. Actually, it's not all that difficult to adjust on a vacuum secondary Holley, so I don't really see what the big fuss is about it. Every carb will need tuning, even if it's just to verify that the tune is already good. The Q-jet is a great carb...........if you're an expert at it. Holley carbs are much simpler and easier to tune, IMO, so for a shadetree mechanic like me, I can get a better result with a Holley, even though it is not as sophisticated a fuel mixing device as a Q-jet. I like to refer to Holley carbs as "Lego carbs", because they are so easy and simple to disassemble, reassemble, modify, and replace parts on. Why, even a knucklehead like me can get good results with one! That's pretty good evidence that they are not that hard to work with. Just my 2 cents worth, I hope it helps,