New heads Pics
I didn't have a .75 reach plug to try. I do not know what plug is recommended for these heads.
Last edited by vettebuyer6369; Feb 25, 2014 at 08:36 PM. Reason: not sure who is calling who a rookie





Last edited by vettebuyer6369; Feb 25, 2014 at 08:37 PM. Reason: not sure who is calling who a rookie
After reviewing these heads with Steve sanchez at total flow products I have decided to not go forward with these castings do to a few issues with the raw casting.
A set of dart castings will be delivered today to keep this project moving.
You going with Dart SHP's?
Installed on a 4.00 bore 350 to scribe the bore on the cylinder head deck and found the chamber diameter is larger than the cylinder bore.
The bowl is too way large for the valve seat ID. And the intake runner size.
Intake to exhaust valve spacing to close to install a larger intake valve to help with the very large bowl area.
Intake openings too tall to match with a standard port intake manifold (iis performer 2101)
Steve did say the pinch point looks nice. His over all opinion is any head would be a better choice for my application.
The advise I was given is to get a set of dart shp 180's unassembled and he will blend the bowls, clean up the ports, match the chambers to the bore and deck to acheive a 60cc chamber
Installed on a 4.00 bore 350 to scribe the bore on the cylinder head deck and found the chamber diameter is larger than the cylinder bore.
The bowl is too way large for the valve seat ID. And the intake runner size.
Intake to exhaust valve spacing to close to install a larger intake valve to help with the very large bowl area.
Intake openings too tall to match with a standard port intake manifold (iis performer 2101)
Steve did say the pinch point looks nice. His over all opinion is any head would be a better choice for my application.
The advise I was given is to get a set of dart shp 180's unassembled and he will blend the bowls, clean up the ports, match the chambers to the bore and deck to acheive a 60cc chamber
My chambers were advertised at 64cc's and were around 67cc's out of the box.
You may also find that the intake runner is more than 180cc's. Mine were as big as 198.6cc's before porting.
Definitely a good idea to clean up and blend before install, I found plenty of work to do there.
My chambers were advertised at 64cc's and were around 67cc's out of the box.
You may also find that the intake runner is more than 180cc's. Mine were as big as 198.6cc's before porting.
Definitely a good idea to clean up and blend before install, I found plenty of work to do there.
Another issue with the formerly mentioned heads is the valve seats have a step under them since the throat is so large.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





With the the first mentioned heads I doubt the intake would be able to seal since the ports are so tall and the performer doesn't have that much material at the top of the intake port.


EQ CYLINDER HEADS: FLOW NUMBERS
EQ strictly by the numbers. How our heads stack up.
Need to know how our numbers compare against the competition? EQ provides you with the following extensive list of cylinder head flow numbers to help you decide.
CH350C
Chevrolet V8 5.7L Vortec
Intake
Lift CFM
0.1 54
0.2 103.9
0.3 147.6
0.4 194.4
0.5 224.3
0.6 226.2
0.7 228.4
Exhaust - Without pipe
Lift CFM
0.1 49.3
0.2 87.6
0.3 118.8
0.4 139.7
0.5 148.5
0.6 152
0.7 152.7
CC180BA
180 cc intake runner / 64 cc combustion chamber
Intake
Lift CFM
0.1 65.4
0.2 130
0.3 177.9
0.4 212.8
0.5 234.9
0.6 242.3
0.7 244.3
Exhaust - Without pipe
Lift CFM
0.1 55.3
0.2 106.6
0.3 133.2
0.4 156.6
0.5 174.5
0.6 182.8
0.7 188.3
The L48 is a bit difficult to improve due to the lousy stock pistons. Even with a thin steel shim head gasket the piston remains 0.025" down the hole which reduces quench effectiveness.
My thinking is vortec heads are the best head the L48 deserves and my WP torquer IIs are nearly overkill.
But it reads like u are shopping for heads that can be used in future builds so good luck to u. But dont be surprised if those SHP heads dont realize their potential until used on a better block/bottom end.
Good luck and post your results,
cardo0
Last edited by cardo0; Mar 27, 2014 at 02:20 AM. Reason: clean up information





Installed on a 4.00 bore 350 to scribe the bore on the cylinder head deck and found the chamber diameter is larger than the cylinder bore.
The bowl is too way large for the valve seat ID. And the intake runner size.
Intake to exhaust valve spacing to close to install a larger intake valve to help with the very large bowl area.
Intake openings too tall to match with a standard port intake manifold (iis performer 2101)
Steve did say the pinch point looks nice. His over all opinion is any head would be a better choice for my application.
The advise I was given is to get a set of dart shp 180's unassembled and he will blend the bowls, clean up the ports, match the chambers to the bore and deck to acheive a 60cc chamber








Ferrea Valves bought separately
Last edited by MotorHead; Mar 27, 2014 at 09:19 AM.





The L48 is a bit difficult to improve due to the lousy stock pistons. Even with a thin steel shim head gasket the piston remains 0.025" down the hole which reduces quench effectiveness.
My thinking is vortec heads are the best head the L48 deserves and my WP torquer IIs are nearly overkill.
But it reads like u are shopping for heads that can be used in future builds so good luck to u. But dont be surprised if those SHP heads dont realize their potential until used on a better block/bottom end.
Good luck and post your results,
cardo0
Had I listened more closely to the members here I would of saved a few $$ and been farther along in my project than I am. There is no benefit in $$ time or performance trying to use a low quality part.
I will keep this updated as it comes together. I can't say enough about total flow and Steve Sanchez great guy to work with.
The top end will be
Q jet
Performer 2101
Dart shp 180's milled decks to bring compression to 9.2-9.5
Comp cams xr276 12-423-8
Bottom end stock Goodwrench 350.






