Compression Test: Results & Questions
As some may know, I STILL have an oil consumption problem. About 1 quart every 3 hour drive. What stumps me is the car does not smoke a heavy blue cloud... however, it does emit a light cloud of oil.
Other than the consumption and apparent oil on the plugs, the engine runs VERY strong. Warms up easy, no miss and crisp off of the line and when driving (no stumbles or weak performance).
I've warmed up the engine and taken readings on #1-#7:
# 1 150psi - Oil stained/caked with oil on electrode/insulator
# 3 150psi - Oil/lighter caking of oil electrode/insulator
# 5 150psi - oil/practically clean; light tan color on insulator
# 7 165psi - Comparable to #3 but a bit lighter oil.
I don't have 1K miles on this rebuild.
Since reassembly, I checked all rocker threads for potential that they may extend into combustion chambers and introduce oil. ALL (#1-#7) rocker holes were dry and no oil. I took the precaution of applying thread sealer to all four rocker studs and retorqued.
Is my $700 valve job leaking? Could my DART heads have porosity issues? Perhaps intake gaskets sucking oil? No surfaces were decked or machined.
I'm about to pull the rockers and springs to see if the shop truly DID install new guides. They apparently installed the nice seals and new Comp parts from my kit as I had stripped the old springs, keepers, locks and seals from the valves when I took the heads in.
Heading to #2-#8 for testing. I wonder if the 150 165psi variance from 1-3-5 compared to 7 is telling? I will re-test 1-3-5 and advise.
Last edited by TedH; Mar 14, 2014 at 05:36 PM.
Beat me to it. I got busy watching Youtube videos on how to change out valve stem seals. Do a search there and you'll see that it's relatively minor work. That's what I'd look at first. Good luck.
#1 - 160psi
#3 - 165psi
#5 - 165psi
#7 - 165psi
I have about 35k on my Hastings Moly Rings and Federal Mogul Hypereutectic (H345NP) pistons) from my 1999 build.
The engine may have cooled a tad but I don't think I was giving it enough revolutions.
Ah, I see what you mean. The guides could be fine but if the fancy seals aren't washing the oil away, the oil WILL make its way down the valves into the chambers.
ok. I am going to take a close look at #1 first as that plug looks the worst. The teflon positive stop valve seals are from the Comp Retro-Roller cam kit. They are the fancier ones that fit inside the Comp dual springs. The heads once had the black one-piece umbrella seals that fit in the single valve springs (with damper). Here's a picture of the seals from my kit:
http://www.jegs.com/i/Comp+Cams/249/...FUcV7Aod0moAFQ
Looks like I will be pulling #1 rocker and spring pack. Going to plug all oil return holes in the cylinder head and pressurize the cylinder with my compressor.
Will advise what I find on #1... It is the worst-appearing so it should indicate issues if there are any.
Let's hope seals cure your problem.
I checked and the PC seal is secure over the valve guide. No movement.
I will reinstall the springs, locks and keepers on #1 exhaust and proceed to the #1 intake valve seal inspection.
Last edited by TedH; Mar 14, 2014 at 07:21 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Duane
So, my next thoughts are... it IS ingesting oil:
- Can I have a bad intake gasket and have good, steady performance? There is no stumble, not erratic and has strong performance.
- Perhaps bad fit (warpage) of intake to heads/block? I run the Fel-Pro 1204's per recommendation of DART for the Iron Eagles.
- Could I have a porous Edelbrock performer intake manifold?
- Can I have bad head gaskets?
- Can I be sucking oil vapor through the PCV?
- Porous cylinder head castings?
If #1 seals look this good and #1 has the worst oil buildup on the plug, do I not bother with checking seals on the rest? I'm thinking the positive locking seals are fine like on #1 I & E.
I can try a push in breather in place of the PCV to see if that helps.... that seems like the easiest change without pulling intake manifold, gaskets or the cylinder heads.
Last edited by TedH; Mar 14, 2014 at 08:10 PM.
Duane

I would check this first before ripping into your motor and finding out it was a ten dollar problem.
If you do not have a PCV system and/or no other way oil could be sucked into the intake, you may have some intake manifold gasket problem, where some oil run-off is being drawn into the intake somewhere. From your data, it would not be into just one cylinder, but to the whole intake (or to just one bank, if all the right bank plugs are clean).
I don't think you have a valve seal or ring problem, or, at least, I think that is unlikely.
The umbrella seals only cleared the inner damper spring on the single 1.25" springs I had before the retro roller conversion.
One other thing which may be telling... I have had oil on the intake near #1 intake port... a small puddle. Not recently. It was shortly after I got the engine back together and had the engine running for a while. No puddle since then. But, I also put better hoses between the PCV and the carb.
Question: I still run an L48 PCV. I note that the L48 and L82 part numbers differ for PCV.
I have quite a bit more HP and TQ. Do I need the PCV for a healthier engine?
This is an interesting thread. I may see about getting an LT1 PCV or big block, solid lifter PCV:
http://www.chevytalk.org/fusionbb/sh...hp?tid/222851/
Considering this PCV valve for '70 396-427: AC CV736C
I've had oil consumption issues since I reached 224rwhp. Got worse as my valve guides/seals failed on the DARTs (blue CLOUDS at startup).
Last edited by TedH; Mar 14, 2014 at 08:54 PM.
The umbrella seals only cleared the inner damper spring on the single 1.25" springs I had before the retro roller conversion.
One other thing which may be telling... I have had oil on the intake near #1 intake port... a small puddle. Not recently. It was shortly after I got the engine back together and had the engine running for a while. No puddle since then. But, I also put better hoses between the PCV and the carb.
Question: I still run an L48 PCV. I note that the L48 and L82 part numbers differ for PCV.
I have quite a bit more HP and TQ. Do I need the PCV for a healthier engine?
This is an interesting thread. I may see about getting an LT1 PCV or big block, solid lifter PCV:
http://www.chevytalk.org/fusionbb/sh...hp?tid/222851/
Considering this PCV valve for '70 396-427: AC CV736C
I've had oil consumption issues since I reached 224rwhp. Got worse as my valve guides/seals failed on the DARTs (blue CLOUDS at startup).
However, it is possible the heads and intake are not matching up perfectly. Wouldn't they be bleeding vacuum if that were the issue? I remember when I mistakenly installed 1205 gaskets. The gasket port was so tall, it protruded above the the intake casting and sounded like a broken rocker... I installed the 1204's after I realized the 1205's were incorrect application.
I've ordered the 396/427 PCV that should compensate for lower than stock vacuum. It may explain why I had oil on the intake above #1 intake runner... that is where the PCV hose passes on way to the carb inlet.
If the HiPo PCV doesn't solve it, the intake gaskets will be next. I read a write-up in one of the motor mags about big block that kept blowing intake gaskets... block, heads or intake had been milled. They found the machining differences by putting shot lead in gaskets and torquing. The shot was in about 8 different places. The different clearances were identified by how much the shot was smashed across the different spots. The machine shop did the measurements and machining to fix.
perhaps I could install double 1204 fel-pro's or just a thicker intake gasket. Do fel-pro or Mr Gasket offer a slightly thicker 1204-style intake gasket?
Will advise once I try the HiPo PCV from the big block.
Last edited by TedH; Mar 14, 2014 at 10:06 PM.






















