When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The intake location works or you can take the correct unit to a machine chop and have the threads re-cut to fit your new heads. That been mentioned many times on the forum. I need to do it for my '77 with an '87 engine.
2nd... you can cut the threads down on a lathe to 3/8 NPT. Any machinist with a lathe should be able to do that for you.
I used one like this on my 79....works just fine. I had the same problem with my new Dart heads....I spent way to much time finding this solution.....anyway, here it is:
this one is from an 81 corvette - should work just fine:
I used one like this on my 79....works just fine. I had the same problem with my new Dart heads....I spent way to much time finding this solution.....anyway, here it is:
this one is from an 81 corvette - should work just fine:
I looked at this option also but was not sure that it would read correctly with my stock gauge so decided to just tap the head since I was afraid that if it did not work, the head would already be on the car. Wish I knew that this sending unit would have worked. Thanks
I looked at this option also but was not sure that it would read correctly with my stock gauge so decided to just tap the head since I was afraid that if it did not work, the head would already be on the car. Wish I knew that this sending unit would have worked. Thanks
If you have a digital meet thermometer you can add it to your pot of water to get the readings at the appropriate temp that corresponds with the gauge.
I installed it in my vortec heads. I also kept the original in the intake manifold. Gauge reads about the same for both.....and I have the temp sender that goes to the computer to compare it with.
Both of the senders to the gauge read a little low......so I'm figuring my gauge is off.
So are all sending units basically the same as far as sending resistance (if that's the correct terminology). Would once from an 81 work for a 76, other than the 3/8 vs 1/2 threads.
it's under 20 bucks and an easy check..... this is the guy I used. I still have it installed on the head and I swap my lead over to it occasionally just to check that it reads about the same as the original. It does. My gauge is goofy...it still reads low as I can tell from my computer temp monitor.
So are all sending units basically the same as far as sending resistance (if that's the correct terminology). Would once from an 81 work for a 76, other than the 3/8 vs 1/2 threads.
I don't know the specifics of the 81 vs. 76, but the crux of the problem is that GM used different resistance values over the years. A you really need to match the sending unit to the particular gauge you have. That's why we're jumping through hoops to get the temp gauge to read correctly when we've changed the heads and the new parts have a different size hole for the temp sender.
Wilcox has some explanations, with pictures, showing the relationship.
Pete
but for about 16 bucks it's worth a try. I was looking at that contraption to tweak the parallel resistance on the gauge (I believe it's Wilcox too?) and I may do it someday, but for now I'm ok with "trending" and my computer display temp.
I was in the same spot when I put my new dart heads on. The sensor would not fit. I put it in the intake manifold. Edelbrock 2101. Only thing is the gauge now sits at 250° or so. BUT according to my laser reader the block and heads are only 200° or 205°
I was in the same spot when I put my new dart heads on. The sensor would not fit. I put it in the intake manifold. Edelbrock 2101. Only thing is the gauge now sits at 250° or so. BUT according to my laser reader the block and heads are only 200° or 205°
Per Post #35 and Wilcox, the higher the resistance of the sender, the higher the gauge will read.
Did you by chance put sealer on the sender threads? That's a possible explanation for the higher reading. You could take an ohmmeter and check the resistance between the sender body and the intake. Should be zero ohms.
As I stated before, mine reads correctly in the intake.
Pete
I did put sealant on the the first couple threads. The brush on permatex. I'll have go back out and check the ohms. I know it's not overheating but there's still that feeling when you look down and see the gauge so high. Like oh man
From: Las Vegas - Just stop perpetuating myths please.
Originally Posted by carriljc
but for about 16 bucks it's worth a try. I was looking at that contraption to tweak the parallel resistance on the gauge (I believe it's Wilcox too?) and I may do it someday, but for now I'm ok with "trending" and my computer display temp.
That temp sensor is a "thermistor" which has a negative temp coeficient which decreases resistance with increasing temp and on top of that it is very non-linear. The match resistance trick wont work. U need a matching "thermistor".
Sorry for the bad news as i hate to be the party pooper here. But the solution is to contact delphi or whoever and get a 3/8" match. FYI Delphi didnt respond to my email.