When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
2025 C2 of the Year ('63 and '67) Finalist - Unmodified
C2 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
Vacuum timing
I just had a minor tune-up done on my '69 big block. The tuner said he timed the motor using a vacuum gauge because the timing pointer was too far away from the harmonic balancer timing mark. Ultimately reporting that he had to retarded the timing.
All this is pretty unfamiliar ground for me but I do have a working vacuum gauge attached to my motor. Before the tune it read 19, it now reads 15 at idle (around 850rpm).
Is this a reasonable way to tune the car? and is the change in idle vacuum good, bad, or doesn't matter?
Would like some experienced comments please.
Not sure but if the guy you took it to knows how to time these cars correctly then it sounds as though you have a problemm with a slipped balancer. Quite a common problem and once fixed, timing will be a breeze!
From: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Originally Posted by 1969RAY
I just had a minor tune-up done on my '69 big block. The tuner said he timed the motor using a vacuum gauge because the timing pointer was too far away from the harmonic balancer timing mark. Ultimately reporting that he had to retarded the timing.
All this is pretty unfamiliar ground for me but I do have a working vacuum gauge attached to my motor. Before the tune it read 19, it now reads 15 at idle (around 850rpm).
Is this a reasonable way to tune the car? and is the change in idle vacuum good, bad, or doesn't matter?
Would like some experienced comments please.
No, you can't get the timing even close to the optimum spec by tuning for vacuum at idle. Timing needs to be set for total timing (36 degrees total), and setting for best vacuum at idle can have the total spec off by up to 20 degrees.
If the engine does not have a timing tab, or if the tab is mislocated, you need to use a TDC finder (or follow the procedure outlined in my TDC Tech Paper) and mark TDC accurately. Once marked, you need to set the timing correctly and check all parameters of the timing and the timing curve. If the balancer has slipped, it needs to be replaced.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by lars
No, you can't get the timing even close to the optimum spec by tuning for vacuum at idle. Timing needs to be set for total timing (36 degrees total), and setting for best vacuum at idle can have the total spec off by up to 20 degrees.
If the engine does not have a timing tab, or if the tab is mislocated, you need to use a TDC finder (or follow the procedure outlined in my TDC Tech Paper) and mark TDC accurately. Once marked, you need to set the timing correctly and check all parameters of the timing and the timing curve. If the balancer has slipped, it needs to be replaced.
Lars
I have to respectfully disagree with a part of your first paragraph. If the timing is set at higher RPM the result is just as off at low RPMs (where the engine spends 95% of its time) as the upper RPM timing would be off if the timing is set at idle. The low RPM timing done by monitoring the vacuum reading is a true indication of what the engine wants/needs for best efficiency, while setting the timing at 36* (without the VA connected at higher RPM to simulate WOT) is an accepted best-guess number due to the lack of easy ways to see what the particular engine actually wants at high RPM/high load.
I agree that a 36* target at high RPM WOT is a viable target, but leaving the low RPM timing "wherever it falls" results in a soggy running, inefficient engine.
From: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Originally Posted by 69427
I agree that a 36* target at high RPM WOT is a viable target, but leaving the low RPM timing "wherever it falls" results in a soggy running, inefficient engine.
I have always been a timing light person myself but know quite a few people whom set their timing using a vacuum gauge. One even insisted it's the best way. I think you are probably alright with where he set it.
That being said I wouldn't worry about a 4lb drop in vacuum. My question to you is how does it run??
2025 C2 of the Year ('63 and '67) Finalist - Unmodified
C2 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
Interesting comments. I gave permission to him to change the balancer and mark if it would benefit the outcome. He elected not to do the change. Also I don't think he set the timing at vacuum idle though not sure of the actual procedure.
It seem to run fine, though much like it did before the work. Ran it around this weekend a bunch without issue but worry some about overheating when the weather really warms up.
I'm running a 750 Demon, vacuum secondary's with a mild cam. The exhaust is a bit restricted with factory sidepipes so no race car.
Another reason I had the work done was to improve the exhaust smell, not really a lean stink but still a bit unpleasant. He told me that a mild cam (other than stock) will always contribute to stinker exhaust.
...He told me that a mild cam (other than stock) will always contribute to stinker exhaust.
Well, no, but then you have to define the particulars on the cam since "mild cam" conveys no particular characteristics other than they probably aren't using that profile in Pro Stock engines.
If the cam has an idle lope, you can get a bit of a stinky exhaust if you just leave things be. This is due to cyclic variation in the cylinders. It's the same thing that makes a 2-stroke at idle sound like a popcorn maker. There can be insufficient mixture and pressure in the cylinder to have full combustion. It ends up being a soft misfire but gets better saturated on the next cycle and does burn.
The factories made many performance cars with fairly large cams and they didn't have stinky idle exhaust so it would seem there is something in your tune up that is causing it to be that way.
[QUOTE=1969RAY;1589558981]
All this is pretty unfamiliar ground for me but I do have a working vacuum gauge attached to my motor. Before the tune it read 19, it now reads 15 at idle (around 850rpm).
QUOTE]
This is NOT ok, a mild cam on healthy engine would give you about 19, or what you had before. Going to 15 is going in the wrong direction.
Have him advance the dizzy a little till it gets back to 19 (another clue is if the idle increases, then you are on the right track). Or even better, FIND ACTUAL TDC.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by lars
I have never advocated that.
Lars
My apologies for the lack of clarity. The second paragraph was intended for the OP. He seems like a novice to the tuning world, and I didn't want him to infer that the lower RPM timing should be ignored as long as the upper RPM WOT timing is okay. There have been posters in other threads where the advice was to leave the idle timing wherever it happened to fall. I believe we share the same perspective that that isn't an efficient timing curve.
2025 C2 of the Year ('63 and '67) Finalist - Unmodified
C2 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
We surely get used to less exhaust smell these days but my first car was a 55 ford back in 1965--my memory is still good enough to sort out the difference.
Have you considered investing in a dial back timing light and doing it yourself? You could then either set it to stock timing numbers or the 36 total modified number.
We surely get used to less exhaust smell these days but my first car was a 55 ford back in 1965--my memory is still good enough to sort out the difference.
I think the 10% alcohol in most fuels causes a change in the exhaust smell.
2025 C2 of the Year ('63 and '67) Finalist - Unmodified
C2 of Year Finalist (appearance mods) 2019
Originally Posted by MelWff
Have you considered investing in a dial back timing light and doing it yourself? You could then either set it to stock timing numbers or the 36 total modified number.
I find that sometimes the exhaust on mine smells and sometimes not. I never gave it a whole lot of thought until now. Could be an issue of where you get your fuel at. You may want to try different stations and fuels without alcohol and see if that makes a difference. Could go to the airport and pick up some really high octane fuel and see what that does..lol..Just kidding...As far as the timing if you are running fine. It isn't hard starting your fine. I would just run it..
Mea Culpa! I'm the poster that says "let the initial timing fall where it may". My question is, if the distributor is set up properly with the correct amount of mechanical advance, what's wrong with "letting it fall"? Not being an expert, I'm more concerned with total than initial advance.
From: I tend to be leery of any guy who doesn't own a chainsaw or a handgun.
Originally Posted by jnb5101
Mea Culpa! I'm the poster that says "let the initial timing fall where it may". My question is, if the distributor is set up properly with the correct amount of mechanical advance, what's wrong with "letting it fall"? Not being an expert, I'm more concerned with total than initial advance.
FWIW, you're not the only poster over the years who has made the let it fall statement.
When you set the timing at 36* @WOT & 3000 RPM (or whatever point you choose), you are making a best guess adjustment of the timing where the engine will spend 1% of its time. Your engine (assuming it's not a race engine in a race car at a race track) spends 99% of its time at less than 100% throttle and less than 3000 RPM. Letting the lower load, lower RPM timing fall "where it may" just results in lower fuel mileage, crappier idle quality and drivability, and hotter exhaust valve and coolant temperatures.
Playing with the idle and low RPM timing to get higher/highest manifold vacuum and best drivability will give you the "other side" of your engine's desired timing curve. There's then members on this forum who can refurbish/recurve your distributor to match the total spectrum of your engine's timing requirements.
lower initial timing will cause higher coolant temperatures. As far as the low end timing number to aim for I go for 12 BTDC with no vacuum connected. Once the vacuum is connected I end up with about 22. Some people have numbers higher than 12 but it is doubtful it would be practical to go beyond a maximum of 20. The factory distributor came with a nylon/plastic advance stop. Over the years it wears out and most spring kits contain a brass replacement bushing. If you set your timing for a maximum of 36 and then find the initial is too low it maybe because the bushing is shot. The other cause is the slot that the bushing rides in is too long.