When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
21 degrees initial is not really out of line for a cam with 230+ degrees of duration at .050 (which is how I interpreted the OPs post). It depends on a lot of factors, but it's not unheard of at all.
I'm running a cam with 233 degrees at .050 and I can set initial higher than that with no kickback at all. However, you may end up backing off initial to get the curve to a place where you are happy with it.
For my current combination, I found that 18 to 20 initial was a good spot once I got the initial + mechanical timing curve to a point where I was reasonably happy with it.
I could actually take more initial timing, but as Jebby said, it may be necessary to compromise.
My car really liked the 21. Idle was better, response was crisper but on the flipside it was harder to crank when engine was hot. Add in the vapor lock issue (still not sure if it was timing related) and I've decided to drop back down to a more factory setup for the moment.
Plan is to connect my fuel pump return (it was capped when I got the car). Install a carb heat spacer and insulate my fuel line that runs close to my headers. Then try 18ish initial and see how she cranks, runs.
Forget the 15 degrees for the moment; its the 21 degrees of initial advance that bothers me as any engine would be hard to crank with that much advance. 21 degrees is 3-1/2 times as much as the recommended 6 degrees.....................
Working on insulating the fuel line. I was able to move it almost 2" away from headers easily. I fabricated a heat shield and double wrapped in some extra reflexics heat wrap I had. Overkill?
Original position was directly in front of where heat shield is now.