Converting 73 to non power steering
2. You need these parts http://www.ecklerscorvette.com/corve...1963-1982.html
http://www.ecklerscorvette.com/corve...1963-1982.html
3. Believe you have to move the position of the outer tie rods where they connect to the steering knuckles
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I felt the original design was very agricultural, heavy and cumbersome.
For the driving I do on open country roads, the change to manual is a huge improvement.
Really positive feel and feedback and not overly twitchy as I found the factory PS to be.
If I did a lot of parking and slow manoeuvring then I would consider PS, and would go the Borgsen route.
When I swapped I replaced the relay rod c/w knuckle joint and pitman arm. I tried leaving the tie rods on the inner hole of the steering arms, but felt the steering effort was too much so I now have them in the outer holes and everything is rosy!
I don’t drag race at all, but would imagine the manual set up and using the outer holes on the steering arms will give you the control and feel you would want. Not too quick, not too heavy?
You can get kit that converts the PS shuttle valve to a fixed link, but I preferred to use correct parts.
Compared with the cost and involvement of Borgsen or Steeroids conversions, I can totally understand why anyone would consider this a viable route to take.
Good luck with conversion...
PS. I also stripped, re-built and set-up my steering box at the same time, and installed a new rag-joint. Now the slightest steering wheel input gives movement at the road wheels.
I felt the original design was very agricultural, heavy and cumbersome.
For the driving I do on open country roads, the change to manual is a huge improvement.
Really positive feel and feedback and not overly twitchy as I found the factory PS to be.
If I did a lot of parking and slow manoeuvring then I would consider PS, and would go the Borgsen route.
When I swapped I replaced the relay rod c/w knuckle joint and pitman arm. I tried leaving the tie rods on the inner hole of the steering arms, but felt the steering effort was too much so I now have them in the outer holes and everything is rosy!
I don’t drag race at all, but would imagine the manual set up and using the outer holes on the steering arms will give you the control and feel you would want. Not too quick, not too heavy?
You can get kit that converts the PS shuttle valve to a fixed link, but I preferred to use correct parts.
Compared with the cost and involvement of Borgsen or Steeroids conversions, I can totally understand why anyone would consider this a viable route to take.
Good luck with conversion...
PS. I also stripped, re-built and set-up my steering box at the same time, and installed a new rag-joint. Now the slightest steering wheel input gives movement at the road wheels.
(I also removed the aftermarket 13.5" diameter steering wheel and installed a 15"diameter wheel....it made parking in tight spaces almost as easy as with power steering)
Last edited by doorgunner; Oct 20, 2015 at 08:37 AM.





The difference between the PS/quick ratio and manual is ~15%, which IMHO can certainly be felt at parking lot speeds. That said, having run both ratios with manual, I've found the quick setting preferable once you get rolling. FWIW to those contemplating what to do about not having steering arms with the additional holes, the necessary tapered bit can run $80-100, plus the risk of slipping up.
Anyway, tho one can simply cut the belt to get home in a pinch, the proper PS/manual conversion always involves changing out the relay/drag link and pitman to the correct bits. My $.02

TSW
It looks like the dimensions are all identical; from centre distances between the steering rods, distance from the pitman arm connection to the left steering rod (which is the same as the distance from the right SR to the idler arm connection).
Also the centre to centre length of the pitman arms is the same and the offset distance between the two ends is the same too.
So the differences between the relay rods are...
No hydraulic ram connector hole on the MS relay rod
A fixed pitman arm connector on the MS instead of a hydraulic valve
And on the pitman arms...
The "wobble" that the arm takes between the two ends looks different. The PS arm looks like a larger kick round whatever the arm is trying to clear. I suspect that it will be the mounting bracket for the hydraulic ram.
Here's some photos....
PS Pitman Arm "wobble"
PS Relay Rod with hydraulic ram connection
PS, PoS?
Manky old PS valve & hoses. Mr & Mrs Leaky
MS Connection knuckle and pitman arm
Entire MS relay rod with no ram connection point
MS Pitman arm looking straight up
If you've any questions while they're still out together, please ask...




















