Considering stroking it (L-48)
First off, I apologize if this is covered in another thread- I did some searching and couldn't find what I was looking for.
I have a 1973 L-48, Mostly original (except for no radio and new exhaust). I absolutely love to drive it; somehow lots of torque and low center of gravity make up for the fact it only has 190 hp. But now I have the bug. I want to make the car even MORE fun, but keep the mostly stock appearance.
I would like to keep the cost lower than that of a new, more powerful crate engine. I've been reading up on stroker kits, obviously this is a popular thing to do in the performance world. I understand there is a general benefit in horsepower (estimated at +40) and torque. I also assume this will help "fix" the 8.5:1 compression ratio. I have some questions:
1) Is it possible to pull this off and still keep the carburetor/intake/headers/exhaust manifold I have currently?
2) Would I need to invest in one of those braces to shore up the 2 bolt mains?
3) what is the answer to life, the universe and everything?
Also, any sage words are encouraged/welcome.
Thanks guys,
Dan
Yes
2) Would I need to invest in one of those braces to shore up the 2 bolt mains?
No. Use ARP fasteners.
3) what is the answer to life, the universe and everything?
42
First off, I apologize if this is covered in another thread- I did some searching and couldn't find what I was looking for.
I have a 1973 L-48, Mostly original (except for no radio and new exhaust). I absolutely love to drive it; somehow lots of torque and low center of gravity make up for the fact it only has 190 hp. But now I have the bug. I want to make the car even MORE fun, but keep the mostly stock appearance.
I would like to keep the cost lower than that of a new, more powerful crate engine. I've been reading up on stroker kits, obviously this is a popular thing to do in the performance world. I understand there is a general benefit in horsepower (estimated at +40) and torque. I also assume this will help "fix" the 8.5:1 compression ratio. I have some questions:
1) Is it possible to pull this off and still keep the carburetor/intake/headers/exhaust manifold I have currently?
2) Would I need to invest in one of those braces to shore up the 2 bolt mains?
3) what is the answer to life, the universe and everything?
Also, any sage words are encouraged/welcome.
Thanks guys,
Dan
All are 100% full roller units and all use every factory component that came from the beginning. All are also independent balance for appearance!
These are somewhat difficult getting the roller rocker setup to fit under the factory covers, but it is doable. The specific chosen pieces determine the difficulty in the end.
The biggest factor chasing HP while keeping "the look" also comes down to the budget! The HP limits obviously would depend on all the pieces used. The C.R. also becomes a limiting factor. Most iron headed builds we do (we're talking pump-gas here) end up around 9.5/9.75:1. The increased stroke makes up for much of the torque "lost" from this lower final C.R.
(Add) I would trust the 2 B.M. setup but with studs at a minimum. Caps with the 4 B.M.'s could be installed but probably not mandatory here. The roller deal alone adds about 30 HP (nominal) to the numbers.
Thanks, Gary in N.Y.
P.S. The final HP numbers WILL vary by all the external components. The OEM Holley equipped builds will make more power over the Q-jets, but not by a whole bunch!
Last edited by GOSFAST; Jun 2, 2016 at 05:55 PM.
Gary, you caught my attention.
The biggest factor chasing HP while keeping "the look" also comes down to the budget! The HP limits obviously would depend on all the pieces used. The C.R. also becomes a limiting factor. Most iron headed builds we do (we're talking pump-gas here) end up around 9.5/9.75:1. The increased stroke makes up for much of the torque "lost" from this lower final C.R.
(Add) I would trust the 2 B.M. setup but with studs at a minimum. Caps with the 4 B.M.'s could be installed but probably not mandatory here. The roller deal alone adds about 30 HP (nominal) to the numbers.
Second, I didn't realize I had options with 'original'! I guess I'm considering this change a "rectification" for the sins of 1973 government oppression, so I'm not sure how much I care about things that no one knows about but me. Now that I think about it, I also have pertronix installed, so I suppose I wouldn't mind changing out anything like cams or rockers if horsepower is at stake.
Whats "the roller deal"?
When you say "we"... are you a company that does this kind of thing?
Last edited by hugie82; Jun 2, 2016 at 08:20 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
If yor vette is an auto, think about getting a higher rpm stall to go well with new engine build.
A well balanced engine can spin up pretty good. Your rpms are typically based on the power rpm range of your cam and other engine parts to compliment each other.
I was looking at that same setup, but I also was thinking about going for the super light weight version- figuring if I keep the weight down it would help with throttle response. (but it's about $2.5 k)
Also, my car is manual, but good catch.
I was looking at that same setup, but I also was thinking about going for the super light weight version- figuring if I keep the weight down it would help with throttle response. (but it's about $2.5 k)
Also, my car is manual, but good catch.

This was about the 8 year mark when I put a new oil pan on and replaced rear main seal. Notice the clearancing on the rods
I am torn because I know once I go this route I can't go back. I'm thinking about investing in a used block and rebuilding the thing... especially after seeing these pictures I feel like I really want to tinker.
I had my c3 for about 2 weeks and the engine began to knock so it was going to get rebuilt.
Here's a video from when we first cranked it to help get you some more motivation.

I also assume that the uneven idling sounds were because you guys still haven't dialed in the carb... yes? The guy in the miller highlife shirt looks like the kinda guy I'd trust with engine stuff.
Good luck with your build. I am glad that I have a '79 that someone else already took the stock stuff off of so I don't feel bad about whatever it is that I want to do. Engine looks nothing like stock and I prefer it that way.
https://i.imgur.com/LUKBARX.jpg
I also assume that the uneven idling sounds were because you guys still haven't dialed in the carb... yes? The guy in the miller highlife shirt looks like the kinda guy I'd trust with engine stuff.
















