L-88
It's generally accepted that in racing trim (for which it was designed) it achieves 560hp. Racing trim on that engine? Add headers and pull off the trim rings and caps. :lol:
Jay's L88 was also run on a bench dyno and made 539hp at the flywheel.
Jay's car is a factory built L88 with a freshly rebuilt motor, mine is an L88 clone with a new L88 crate motor. You can check my web site for more information and pictures.
Chuck


Back to your question: Chevy's intent was to put the L88's in the hands of racers and they downplayed the car's potential in several ways, so the average guy would go for the L71/435 engines, thinking at a glance that they were the top of the line. The 430 HP rating came far below the engine's peak power RPM, I think in the upper 4's if my memory serves me right. Again, this was Chevy's way of downplaying the car's potential. There have been many reports of L88's dynoing in the range of 560 HP when operated within their intended powerband with open headers.
A little more history: The L88 was factory installed in production Corvettes for 3 years, 67, 68, & 69. There were 20-67's, 80-68's, & 116-69's. The 67, 68, & early 69's were virtually identical engines. In mid 69 production, the engines were changed from the previous closed chamber design heads to open chamber heads with a corresponding change in piston dome design. There was also a change in the camshaft. The "second design" L88 was essentially a ZL1 with a cast iron block. The Corvette was the only car that GM factory installed L88's in and offered them to the public, as opposed to the ZL1 which was offered in Corvette (2 reportedly) and Camaro (69 reportedly) The second design L88 as well as the ZL1 had a rated compression ratio of 12:1 as opposed to the earlier closed chambered engine's 12.5:1 comp. ratio. All L88's prior to 69 had the M22 "rock crusher" transmission. Some time in later 69 there were a few equipped with Turbo 400's with the high shift point and 6 bolt torque converter which was also available on the L71 & L71/L89. I don't recall the number of Turbo 400 L88's. No L88 Corvette was ever equipped with a radio from the factory and the 67's weren't available with heaters either. In another effort to make them less sociable as street cars, GM also furnished them without fan shrouds, making them prone to overheating in traffic.
My L88 is one of the 116 made in 69. It's one of the earlier closed chamber cars which seem by far to be the most common. Incredibly, GM chose to choke them with 2" exhaust systems in both undercar and side exhaust cars by the time my car was made. I know the 67's had 2 1/2" systems and I'm not sure when the change was made, whether in 68 or 69. They're not brutally fast with stock exhaust systems by today's standards, (although a set of headers will wake one up), but they're still incredible vehicles.
Edit: Sorry if it looks like my post is a duplicate of some of the above comments. At the time I started typing it there were no replies, then when it posted there were 3 others already.
[Modified by Solidlifters, 3:32 AM 9/17/2002]
[Modified by Solidlifters, 10:23 PM 9/17/2002]
No problem, you dun great! :cheers:
Chuck





I gather that your reference to "furnished without heater cores" in fact meant fan shrouds, which as you noted, made them difficult to drive in stop and go traffic. Interestingly enough, while the M-22 cars had aluminum radiators and lacked fan shrouds, the M-40 cars used a copper radiator with a fan shroud. The copper radiator was necessary because the aluminum units did not have provisions for the coolant lines for the automatic transmission. The only L-88/M-40 car that I am aware of that did not have a shroud was the Daytona yellow convertible that was used as a test car by Hot Rod, Car Life, and SS&DI (though it DID use a copper radiator).
With regard to your exhaust question, the change to 2" diameter exhaust for all engines was solely during the 1969 model year. 1968 still used the 2½" system for big block applications and 1970 saw the return of the 2½" system in big blocks and LT-1s... I always wondered why this change was made in 1969... If anyone has documentation as to why this occured, I'd sure like to hear about it!
Regards,
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
[Rodney Dangerfield] "I tell ya, I get no respect....":) [/Rodney Dangerfield]
Forgot about that one myself... Actually, they used a vacuum secondary 4054 Holley on the closed chamber head L-88s (at least the 1968-69s)... Basically all but a few pre-strike 1969 L-88s. I think the double pumper that came late in 1969 on the open chamber head engines was a 4296, but to be honest, I'm going from memory on that one... Someone needs to verify that.
Joe, wasn't there an issue with the initial delivery of ZL-1 Camaros... Came through with the vacuum secondary carburetor instead of the double pumper causing some "issues" with NHRA tech inspectors?
Regards,


Good eye Rowdy. That's exacty what I meant. It's amazing how many times my fingers don't say what my mind's spittin' out. This old age/pre Alzheimers thing is gettin' to be a drag. I edited my original post to show the correction.
As far as the vacuum secondary issue, I've always been of the opinion that all the pre open chamber L88's had the vacuum secondaries, although I have no experience with 68's and limited exposure to known correct 67's. One of my friends here did buy a late, open chambered, original paint, original engine 8800 mile L88 in the late 80's. We took this car to Bloomington and it was the first L88 ever awarded the "Survivor" status there. It had also previously been in Special Collection there. This car was a wealth of information, because almost all of the original components were intact except for the exhaust system and smog. (Kustom dealer installed sidepipe headers when car was new) My friend sold this car about 3 years ago and it went to Alabama and I've lost track of it now. It was Monaco Orange.
There were only 20 L-88s made in 1967
......only 80 L-88s made in 1968
.....and yes only 116 made in 1969 ....which is just shy of 220 total for 3 years ! :eek:
Of course good luck finding one....and at a decent price since most retail for $100k plus !!! :lol:
*Might I note that 500+ hp was on high octane gas ? ...Sunoco 260 ! :D


Unfortunately, with the choking factory exhaust, with the 69's 2" system being by far the worst, none of these cars made 500+ horsepower as delivered but it was widely thought at the time that a set of open headers was worth 100 HP on an otherwise pure stock L88.
What makes the biggest difference is getting rid of the back pressure. The car is sooo much easier to drive with headers and free flowing exhaust compared to running through more restrictive mufflers. My uncapped JCL spiral baffles do a credible job in quieting the car, but cost virtually no horsepower in doing so. Removing the caps increased the noise by about 4.5 db's at 1250rpm idle and 2500 rpm free revs. There was only 6 hp difference between open headers and running with the baffles. Rejetting the carb will get all 6 hp back. Based on Jay's car making 539 flywheel horse power and 471rwhp with no engine changes, my 483rwhp should equal about 555 gross horse power. With better tuning.... ;)
Driving with 2" pipes and mufflers must be a much greater chore.
Chuck
[Modified by Chuck Harmon, 6:55 PM 9/17/2002]
Comments by others would be very welcome!
Chuck
[Modified by Chuck Harmon, 7:26 PM 9/17/2002]


But that would be one great dyno comparrison I would love to see!
Chuck
Chuck











