Brake caliper leak again
I'm suspecting that if it's doable, that Wilwood could do it since they make kits for other vehicles. I hate that drum-parking-brake-POS.
Last edited by carriljc; Apr 6, 2018 at 10:48 PM.
I'm suspecting that if it's doable, that Wilwood could do it since they make kits for other vehicles. I hate that drum-parking-brake-POS.
I'm suspecting that if it's doable, that Wilwood could do it since they make kits for other vehicles. I hate that drum-parking-brake-POS.[/QUOTE]
I suspect it is also. But...
First you'd have two common options:
1. The Dual Action Combo Caliper which is already used on a number of rear kits.
2. The Twin Caliper design, also used on a number of current kits.
I've used them both on custom builds myself. For smaller and lighter cars the dual action caliper make sense. It's capable of providing a solid braking event without a lot of space, uses common D342 pads, and has a modest amount of piston area. I've used the twin caliper design also; a customer who wantd four pot calipers on the back of his Mustang SN95 IRS suspension car. It was a challenge and one I'm rather proud of so here it is.
Now I'll take a swing at why you're quite unlikely to see this for the C3.
1. Piston area and design. The common D8 rear is a 3.0" caliper. The largest Dual Action caliper is but 2.06". Meaning you'd have a loss of roughly 33% clamp force. Not to mention the caliper is simply a single piston slider which will struggle to meet the demands of the performance enthusiast with a loss of pedal feel and response. It's clearly a step back.
2. The twin caliper design would address the needs of piston area as we'd have a four pot FNSL4 likely combined like above with that rotor. Brake force is back in check now. But it's designed for a .810" wide rotor so you'd lose rotor mass and of course be a 2pc design. That said you'd have a conventional BBK of sorts on the rear and oe parts up front. The matchy-matchy customers will cry foul. If it can be packaged you'd like need custom cables for the brakes also and the rotor would be quite small to package all that inside the wheel. Ballpark price: $16-1800 with the cables and such.
3. Market. The market for that just to ditch the drum-n-disc (a very successful and popular current design I might add) would be tiny if at all. You can get as good or better a rotor and equal caliper performance for about $500, why would you pay 3X the money for an equal product that's complicated to install, no better functioning than stock and clearly not period correct in is basic appearance?
*I'm not saying someone would not. And in fact if you want it; get with me off line and we can discuss it. What I can tell you is that the custom build of such a kit would run you probably $2200 or so by the time we're done with it. It'll be everything you want it to be just more money as I can't compete with my supplier for the basic parts. Been there, done it. Hit me up.
Last edited by Todd TCE; Apr 7, 2018 at 02:11 PM.
I was looking at the following:http://www.wilwood.com/Calipers/Cali...o=120-10110-RD
It's for the fat and heavy early 2000s Mustangs...so it looked somewhat doable. Thanks anyway.
First you'd have two common options:
1. The Dual Action Combo Caliper which is already used on a number of rear kits.
2. The Twin Caliper design, also used on a number of current kits.
I've used them both on custom builds myself. For smaller and lighter cars the dual action caliper make sense. It's capable of providing a solid braking event without a lot of space, uses common D342 pads, and has a modest amount of piston area. I've used the twin caliper design also; a customer who wantd four pot calipers on the back of his Mustang SN95 IRS suspension car. It was a challenge and one I'm rather proud of so here it is.
Now I'll take a swing at why you're quite unlikely to see this for the C3.
1. Piston area and design. The common D8 rear is a 3.0" caliper. The largest Dual Action caliper is but 2.06". Meaning you'd have a loss of roughly 33% clamp force. Not to mention the caliper is simply a single piston slider which will struggle to meet the demands of the performance enthusiast with a loss of pedal feel and response. It's clearly a step back.
2. The twin caliper design would address the needs of piston area as we'd have a four pot FNSL4 likely combined like above with that rotor. Brake force is back in check now. But it's designed for a .810" wide rotor so you'd lose rotor mass and of course be a 2pc design. That said you'd have a conventional BBK of sorts on the rear and oe parts up front. The matchy-matchy customers will cry foul. If it can be packaged you'd like need custom cables for the brakes also and the rotor would be quite small to package all that inside the wheel. Ballpark price: $16-1800 with the cables and such.
3. Market. The market for that just to ditch the drum-n-disc (a very successful and popular current design I might add) would be tiny if at all. You can get as good or better a rotor and equal caliper performance for about $500, why would you pay 3X the money for an equal product that's complicated to install, no better functioning than stock and clearly not period correct in is basic appearance?
*I'm not saying someone would not. And in fact if you want it; get with me off line and we can discuss it. What I can tell you is that the custom build of such a kit would run you probably $2200 or so by the time we're done with it. It'll be everything you want it to be just more money as I can't compete with my supplier for the basic parts. Been there, done it. Hit me up.
The parts about loss of braking torque, lack of feel and response, that it doesn't fit the stock rotor.....
Last edited by Todd TCE; Apr 7, 2018 at 04:45 PM.
We overlooked a rather simple one; The line lock.
The C3 I'm pretty sure has a simple two channel brake system. One feed to the front and one feed to the rear. Far easier to work with than today's four channel systems for this.
Fit this in line to the rear and you'll energize the entire rear system. *And lost no rear brake performance for driving needs.
Last edited by Todd TCE; Apr 7, 2018 at 05:19 PM.
X2And just because a car has O-ring calipers...the rotor run-out and wheel bearings still should be well within tolerances.
DUB
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

We overlooked a rather simple one; The line lock.
The C3 I'm pretty sure has a simple two channel brake system. One feed to the front and one feed to the rear. Far easier to work with than today's four channel systems for this.
Fit this in line to the rear and you'll energize the entire rear system. *And lost no rear brake performance for driving needs.
Whenever I put my car up on ramps I disconnect the battery and put an extension (wood, pipe, whatever) on the brake pedal to lock the wheels and avoid inadvertent "rolling".
I must have gone back and forth three times between just getting Wilwoods and sticking with rebuilt. At least I am a pro at taking apart the brakes now. It is always something, LOL.





Last edited by The Punisher; Apr 10, 2018 at 05:40 AM.
Granted my VBP calipers were installed by me in 1985 and I don't know their quality today, but have you spoken to them? Another option is the NEW OEM SS calipers sold by a few vendors.





Granted my VBP calipers were installed by me in 1985 and I don't know their quality today, but have you spoken to them? Another option is the NEW OEM SS calipers sold by a few vendors.
VBP would cost about $220 for 1 remanufactured caliper. Seems a bit costly
https://www.vbandp.com/c3-corvette-p...-calipers.html
VBP Car Set Calipers lip Seals-$389
VBP Car Set Calipers O Ring-$480
Call them for a quote. 1-903-829-8400
This is who I use ...for whatever that is worth...and have NO problems with calipers.
DUB
Last edited by DUB; Apr 10, 2018 at 05:50 PM.
It is also...a recommendation...instead of the car just sitting there. Not saying that a car just sitting in garage is bad ( except for possible flat spotting the tires)...but...it is not secret that ignoring the car can cause for seals and other items to begin to possibly fail.
I have not. So I can not help you here.
DUB















