C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Upgrading return line to 3/8"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 03:49 PM
  #21  
pauldana's Avatar
pauldana
Race Director
Supporting Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,956
Likes: 409
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by NewbVetteGuy
Mobird: Just a thought. I THINK the 82 sending units are 3/8" on the feed, 5/16" on the return, and 1/4" for the line from the charcoal canister...

If you need to drop the tank to cut off the old 1/4" return line, you might consider just buying an 82 sending unit ($91). https://www.1aauto.com/1982--chevy-c...Fuel%20Systems and a walbro GSS 340, 341 or 342 in-tank pump for $80.

It'll be quieter than a separate in-line pump and it sounds like you have to drop the tank anyway.

I understand you already have the external style walbro, though.




Adam
bolded
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 04:22 PM
  #22  
NewbVetteGuy's Avatar
NewbVetteGuy
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 332
From: Woodinville WA
Default

Originally Posted by pauldana
I had this system... and I upgraded it to the FAST XFI with throttle body... I would suggest you do the same... a few hundred dollars more, but a LOT more flexibility in the tuning, and maps/data out for troubleshooting... you do not have this with the EZ.

Also, YES, the return line will NOT work properly with the 1/4" line, needs to be changed









Paul, what year tank is that? Is that just a 77-81 style tank with the plastic line removed and then that metal baffle welded in?

Awesome to see interior pictures.
Also, do you know the exact model of that pump? (I could not get my Walbro GSS342 to work with the hanger bracket and cut the hanger bracket off to make mine work; I can see the hangar on yours is intact still.)

Adam

Last edited by NewbVetteGuy; Aug 27, 2018 at 04:26 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 04:27 PM
  #23  
NewbVetteGuy's Avatar
NewbVetteGuy
Melting Slicks
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,979
Likes: 332
From: Woodinville WA
Default

Originally Posted by DUB
I also would use a sending unit out of a 1982 so my fuel pump would be in the fuel tank and I also would fabricate up a reservoir on the sending unit to the fuel pump always had a source to draw fuel from so when making turns the fuel could not slosh around and possibly starve out the pump.

DUB
If you buy the Walbro GSS342 in-tank pump, it almost perfectly mates up with this Holley Hydramat: https://www.holley.com/products/fuel...s/parts/16-111 (you just have to remove two little plastic "ears" on the bottom of the pump)
-Then as long as you have fuel touching any part of the Hydramat you won't have fuel starvation. It's probably a more expensive solution than fabricating a reservoir ($150), but it's a pretty fast and simple solution to the fuel starvation problem.
(See Paul's pictures earlier in this thread for what the Hydramat looks like in the tank).

I went with the 82 sending unit;
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 04:52 PM
  #24  
lionelhutz's Avatar
lionelhutz
Race Director
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,152
Likes: 890
From: South Western Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by mobird
True. The FAST system has a regulator on the return side, presumably it wouldnt be able to maintain 43 PSI (the recommended setting from FAST) If the return line was too small?
Yes, it would go over the pressure setting. I didn't mean install with the regulator, I meant just a loop with a gauge in it. If the pressure is <43psi then you can use the return line you have.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2018 | 04:54 PM
  #25  
pauldana's Avatar
pauldana
Race Director
Supporting Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,956
Likes: 409
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by NewbVetteGuy
Paul, what year tank is that? Is that just a 77-81 style tank with the plastic line removed and then that metal baffle welded in?

Awesome to see interior pictures.
Also, do you know the exact model of that pump? (I could not get my Walbro GSS342 to work with the hanger bracket and cut the hanger bracket off to make mine work; I can see the hangar on yours is intact still.)

Adam
it is an aftermarket standard steel tank, my plastic one was leaking, AND I could not modify it for racing.. this tank now has 3 sections running front rear, and the center section has the pump and zig-zag baffle as well as the hydro matt.

The pump supplied by FAST for intake is the one showed in the picture with the holly hydro mat.

Originally Posted by NewbVetteGuy
If you buy the Walbro GSS342 in-tank pump, it almost perfectly mates up with this Holley Hydramat: https://www.holley.com/products/fuel...s/parts/16-111 (you just have to remove two little plastic "ears" on the bottom of the pump)
-Then as long as you have fuel touching any part of the Hydramat you won't have fuel starvation. It's probably a more expensive solution than fabricating a reservoir ($150), but it's a pretty fast and simple solution to the fuel starvation problem.
(See Paul's pictures earlier in this thread for what the Hydramat looks like in the tank).

I went with the 82 sending unit;
The Hydro matt mates up the the FAST pump just fine... as seen in pictures above.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2018 | 08:29 AM
  #26  
mobird's Avatar
mobird
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 163
Default

Originally Posted by lionelhutz
Yes, it would go over the pressure setting. I didn't mean install with the regulator, I meant just a loop with a gauge in it. If the pressure is <43psi then you can use the return line you have.
Ok good to know, thanks!

I spent all weekend building a shed so I haven't been able to mess with it yet, hopefully get rolling this weekend. For now I just need to figure out the 3/8 hardline to AN -6 connection, and the 5/16 return to AN-6. Once I get time to get under the car and look at the connections I should have a better idea of what I need. I have a tubing bender so I'm thinking I will bend and run new hardline anywhere possible.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2018 | 12:17 PM
  #27  
mobird's Avatar
mobird
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 163
Default

Ok another question that came up, what should I be using for a pre-filter before my inline pump? I have a good low-micron post filter, but I hear that you should aim for something in the 100 micron range as a pre-filter so that it doesn't cause the pump to have to work hard "sucking"fuel.

I see alot of people saying they use just a cheap inline filter like this:
Amazon Amazon

but it claims it filters down to 10 microns, which according to what I"ve read is too restrictive as a pre-filter.

What are you guys using?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2018 | 02:29 PM
  #28  
lionelhutz's Avatar
lionelhutz
Race Director
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,152
Likes: 890
From: South Western Ontario
Default

Nothing. Straight off the 3/8" sump fitting to the pump.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Aug 31, 2018 | 08:20 AM
  #29  
mobird's Avatar
mobird
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 163
Default

Originally Posted by lionelhutz
Nothing. Straight off the 3/8" sump fitting to the pump.
So i'm guessing that means the sock in the tank is enough to stop larger debris.

Swapped my intakes back to my vic jr. single plane last night (was running a performer RPM dual plane, but I hear the single planes work better with throttle body EFI. Plus the RPM was a spreadbore bolt pattern so I would have had to use a carb adapter for the FAST throttle body).

I think I have most of my fuel system figured out. Ended up getting some -6 fuel line and -6 AN fittings for the connections from the factory hardline to the TB, and then from the throttle body to the regulator, and regulator back to factory return line. And then for the short hose connections at the tank I am replacing them with FI rated hose and double clamping, same with the connections from the hardline to fuel pump.

There was some debate over whether the factory return line is 1/4" or 5/16". Weirdly after spending some time googling around it almost seems like it varied on some of the cars, because some people are positive they had 1/4", some say 5/16". I measured mine with a digital caliper and it measures at 0.27", which is technically between 1/4" and 5/16", but closer to 1/4". Weird.

Anyways, planning to run it first with factory return line and see how it does. Worst case scenario, I'll already have the TB return line plumbed down to the hardline at the frame rail, so it would just be a matter of running the hardline back to the tank and then figuring out a larger sump fitting.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2018 | 08:35 AM
  #30  
DUB's Avatar
DUB
Race Director
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 19,294
Likes: 2,754
From: Charlotte NC
Default

YES..I would say to sue the sock filter that goes on your fuel pump to stop major debris and it is...as I have read somewhere and been told...that it stops water from passing through it UNLESS it is submersed in water.

I prefer the GM design due to it being tubular and can hold that shape versus some of the ...what I call 'pancake' design sock filters that are really flat and I feel do not really filter well.

The photo below is what go with myself.


DUB
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2018 | 09:04 PM
  #31  
lionelhutz's Avatar
lionelhutz
Race Director
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,152
Likes: 890
From: South Western Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by mobird
So i'm guessing that means the sock in the tank is enough to stop larger debris.
By sump I mean the fuel sump welded onto the bottom of the tank. No sock. It's been that way for years now.

The sock should stop enough debris though. That's all the factory pumps have for a filter.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2018 | 09:48 AM
  #32  
DUB's Avatar
DUB
Race Director
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 19,294
Likes: 2,754
From: Charlotte NC
Default

Not having taken apart new style fuel pump for a C5,C6 or C7as of yet to see if GM implemented a filter inside the pumps construction. Logic would dictate that some form of filtration is there due to making sure any significant debris does not ruin the pump. Because assuming that each and every gas stations has perfect filters coming off of the tank in the ground is kind of ridiculous. Like I have heard. You do not want to get gas when they are filling up the in ground tanks due to they are stirring up the stuff that is in them.

I can say that the C4 Corvettes have that filter sock I posted a photo of on the fuel pump and also has a yellowish-white sump bonded to the bottom of the plastic liner in the fuel tank..

Whether you cut open your tank to install a sump set-up or attach it to the sending unit like I have seen. I feel it is wise to take that step so the pump is always drawing fuel from a reservoir that is not effected by you accelerating or making turns while driving.

DUB

Last edited by DUB; Sep 1, 2018 at 05:07 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2018 | 02:37 PM
  #33  
mobird's Avatar
mobird
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 163
Default

By any chance does anyone on here have the FAST Rpm module tach adapter thing ? Part # is 170637.

I bought the EFI used and the previous owner had an MSD ignition and didnt need it (the FAST EZ system requires a really clean tach signal, so you have to either use the tach adapter with an HEI, or use a CDI ignition) and didnt have it. So I either need to find one to buy cheaply (costs nearly $100 new, so I'm hoping someone has it and doesnt need it ) or figure out a cheap CD ignition.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2018 | 05:10 PM
  #34  
DUB's Avatar
DUB
Race Director
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 19,294
Likes: 2,754
From: Charlotte NC
Default

I took a minute and took a part a sending unit for a C5 and there is filter sock inside it. The round white housing is the sump also. The red arrow is pointing to the filter sock.




DUB
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2018 | 02:44 PM
  #35  
mobird's Avatar
mobird
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 163
Default

Ok so I'm getting mixed answers on this after doing some research, so I just want to make absolutely sure: you are saying if I am using an external fuel pump, I ONLY need the post filter, no pre filter (since the sock in the tank will filter enough)?

I see most people saying use a 100 micron pre filter, and I see some saying you can use any 3/8" pre filter since it is not under pressure before the pump.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2018 | 04:37 PM
  #36  
ignatz's Avatar
ignatz
Safety Car
Supporting Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,364
Likes: 1,588
From: los altos hills california
Default

Originally Posted by mobird
Ok so I'm getting mixed answers on this after doing some research, so I just want to make absolutely sure: you are saying if I am using an external fuel pump, I ONLY need the post filter, no pre filter (since the sock in the tank will filter enough)?

I see most people saying use a 100 micron pre filter, and I see some saying you can use any 3/8" pre filter since it is not under pressure before the pump.
Conceptually you don't want to use an overly restrictive filter before the pump. It will inhibit flow. I would say the latter are correct in their reasoning.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2018 | 04:38 PM
  #37  
lionelhutz's Avatar
lionelhutz
Race Director
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 11,152
Likes: 890
From: South Western Ontario
Default

I haven't used anything to filter before the pump for years now, so I would think you'd be just fine with the sock in the tank.

As I pointed out last time, the factory (GM) has always only uses a sock on EFI pumps, so it's not as big a problem as some people worry about.

You could check that the sock is in good condition and not collapsed around the pipe so it restricts flow.

Last edited by lionelhutz; Sep 4, 2018 at 04:39 PM.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Upgrading return line to 3/8"

Old Sep 4, 2018 | 05:50 PM
  #38  
DUB's Avatar
DUB
Race Director
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 19,294
Likes: 2,754
From: Charlotte NC
Default

Obviously the sock will do fine due to seeing the sending unit I posted a photo of out of a C5.

As for the filter AFTER your fuel pump....and knowing that you are using fuel injectors. What do they recommend as the micron value for a fuel filter??? They are selling you this set-up ...so they should know what to put in it so you are compliant and the system will last.

When I run into issue like this like I have in the past I call a company like WIX and have them look up what the filter is and the micron value for that fuel filer replacement for a C5 for example and then C4 and see if the micron values changed or stayed consistent.

100 microns AFTER the fuel pump seems to be fine for fuel injectors but call and find out for yourself. If I am not mistaken the fuel filter for a C4 is above 100 microns.

DUB
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2018 | 08:41 AM
  #39  
mobird's Avatar
mobird
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 163
Default

Originally Posted by DUB
Obviously the sock will do fine due to seeing the sending unit I posted a photo of out of a C5.

As for the filter AFTER your fuel pump....and knowing that you are using fuel injectors. What do they recommend as the micron value for a fuel filter??? They are selling you this set-up ...so they should know what to put in it so you are compliant and the system will last.

When I run into issue like this like I have in the past I call a company like WIX and have them look up what the filter is and the micron value for that fuel filer replacement for a C5 for example and then C4 and see if the micron values changed or stayed consistent.

100 microns AFTER the fuel pump seems to be fine for fuel injectors but call and find out for yourself. If I am not mistaken the fuel filter for a C4 is above 100 microns.

DUB
I saw the picture of the C5 sending unit, and I appreciate the research! But is the C5 sending unit the same as the C3? I guess I was wondering what the relevance is.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2018 | 09:47 AM
  #40  
mobird's Avatar
mobird
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 163
Default

Ok I took my fuel sending unit out. FYI, on my 79 I was able to remove it without dropping the tank by removing the fuel door and rubber cover, and then finagling the sending unit out of the fuel door hole.

Plan is to remove the 1/4" return line fitting, and use a 3/8" 90 degree fitting with a hose barb on one end (top) and NPT threaded bottom end. Then I can thread on a lenth of 3/8" flared line to put the return below the fuel level.

Then I will just attach my current 3/8" feed line to the new 3/8" hose barb (return line) and run a new 3/8" feed line. I figure this is the best solution for me since I would have to cut the stock feed line anyway to install the fuel pump and filter, so I might as well leave it in tact and run a new length of hardline. Hopefully getting that done tonight!
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Corvettes that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 10:34:17


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer

A lot of money has changed hands at the online auction house over the years.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-03 10:21:50


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: 10 great gifts Corvette enthusiasts actually want for Father's Day!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:40


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-8
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE