When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Does it make any difference if you use a vented gas cap on 1969 chevelle 396 325 hp? I believe it is a non vented tank
If it's not a vented tank you need a vented cap. Not sure what was stock on your 69 Chevelle but 69 Corvette is not a vented tank and requires the vented cap.
Last edited by CanadaGrant; Sep 10, 2018 at 12:19 PM.
EVERY system has to be vented in one way or another. Otherwise, the tank would create a vacuum as the fluid was being used. If only the tank was involved, IT would be vented. But, once the vapor recovery systems were added, venting the system at the tank became a liability. In the C3 era, venting 'duties' were assigned to the vapor canister. The tank was connected to the vapor canister with a hose so that fumes could be collected in the charcoal pack. And that charcoal pack was vented to atmosphere after it absorbed those fumes. That was the vent.
Regardless of whether your system has the vapor catch hardware still on it or not, it MUST have a vent somewhere. If you want to capture the fuel vapors, you need a 'catch' system and THAT should be vented. If not, either the tank or the cap could have a vent. But you must have one...somewhere...or your fuel system will not work properly.
Last edited by 7T1vette; Sep 10, 2018 at 10:28 PM.
later models use non vented caps because of the charcoal canister Is supposed to trap fuel instead of venting to air, with your year its most probable that u need a vented cap, if you cannot know for certain if the tank or system ahs ever been repolaced I would just go with a vented cap, better to have it then to need it and not have it, all kinds of nasty problems arise from non vented caps installed where vented is needed, everything from engine dying to crushed tanks and fuel lines
If you have a vapor collection system which is operational, that will serve as the vent. If you add a vented cap to that kind of system, your tank will be vented (twice), but the vapor system will be defeated. That C3 vapor collection tank is OPEN at the bottom allowing it to serve as the vent. Exhaust 'air' must pass through the activated charcoal first so that fuel vapors will be captured and held for later disposal.
If you have a vapor collection system which is operational, that will serve as the vent. If you add a vented cap to that kind of system, your tank will be vented (twice), but the vapor system will be defeated. That C3 vapor collection tank is OPEN at the bottom allowing it to serve as the vent. Exhaust 'air' must pass through the activated charcoal first so that fuel vapors will be captured and held for later disposal.
the biggest reason the canister was adopted was not for emissions but because the garage would get a gassy smell from the tanks venting inside a closed garage, not saying the emissions wasn't a factor but it had more to do with pleasing the consumers then from saving the environment.
the biggest reason the canister was adopted was not for emissions but because the garage would get a gassy smell from the tanks venting inside a closed garage, not saying the emissions wasn't a factor but it had more to do with pleasing the consumers then from saving the environment.
Starting in late 69, Federal emission regs made it illegal to vent gasoline fumes directly to the atmosphere. I believe it was written into the EPA's 1970 Clean Air Act.
GM wasn't going to go to the expense of redesigning their gas tanks, designing all of the related plumbing, and installing the charcoal canisters, just because someone's garage might smell like gasoline. GM didn't put an extra penny in a car, unless it absolutely had to.
Last edited by gbvette62; Sep 11, 2018 at 04:40 PM.
Starting in late 69, Federal emission regs made it illegal to vent gasoline fumes directly to the atmosphere. I believe it was written into the EPA's 1970 Clean Air Act.
GM wasn't going to go to the expense of redesigning their gas tanks, designing all of the related plumbing, and installing the charcoal canisters, just because someone's garage might smell like gasoline. GM didn't put an extra penny in a car, unless it absolutely had to.
its entirely possible that your right but I believe the vapor was implemented at the same time obd was replaced by obd ii in the 90's. I was a lil kid in the early 70's and I remember seeing ads on tv about the way new cars wont stink up your garage but if I recall correctly these were local dealership advertisements, cant recall exactly though, anyways going off topic, venting a tank twice will result in gassy smell in garage, we can agree on that I hope.
Those local TV ads just mimed the spin from GM to create a better attitude about the EPA-required stuff. OBD-I began in 1981 for Corvettes; vapor canisters were in GM cars in the mid/late '60's.
I believe vapor canisters were introduced on the C3 in 1970. 69's did not have them and it was the last year for the vented cap which was used on the 68's and 69's.
thanks all for the correction, I like learning new things, not so much like learning what I knew was not correct, regs for the obii in 95 state the vapor cannisters were required but California and few other states mandated them in '70 so at least I wasn't totally incorrect, just mostly lol!
I've owned many cars, motorcycles and boats with vented caps and never had gas fumes in my garage.
Many times those who have fumes in their garage find it is caused in a problem with their canister, fuel separator or leaking fuel/vapor lines.
Go to the C1 and C2 forums and ask how many have had fuel fumes in their garages and the problem turned out to be solely because they have a vented fuel cap.
Many times it could be a faulty, ill fitting, damaged cap or a cheap Chinese manufactured locking cap that does not seal properly on the tank lip.