C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

427 Small Block timing specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2018, 02:50 PM
  #1  
drwet
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
drwet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 3,041
Received 538 Likes on 413 Posts

Default 427 Small Block timing specs

I am about to pull the distributor (MSD Pro-Billet HEI) out of the '79 for a rebuild. Last time I had it out there was too much end play and I didn't have the right shims to correct it. I now have the parts, and I'm going to take the time to set it up properly. I have been setting up distributors for more years than I choose to remember, so I don't need advice on how to do it. What I would like however, is some opinions on what timing specs to use. My last engine was a 383 with a moderate cam (224/224), Trick Flow heads, and 9.5:1 compression. It seemed to like 14 deg initial, 34 deg total all in by 3000, and another 16 degrees of vacuum advance. My current engine is a 427 small block, AFR 220 heads, 10.25:1 compression, and a hydraulic roller cam with 233/241 duration. My inclination is to add a little more initial because of the longer duration camshaft, reduce the mechanical to stay with about 34 degrees total, and keep the 16 degrees of vacuum advance. This sound about right?
Old 12-22-2018, 03:10 PM
  #2  
gkull
Team Owner
 
gkull's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 21,752
Received 1,331 Likes on 1,059 Posts

Default

I would buy an adjustable vacuum advance and turn it down to 8-10 additional. 16-20 initial is a good starting point
The following users liked this post:
drwet (12-22-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 03:20 PM
  #3  
Gunfighter13
Pro
 
Gunfighter13's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 529
Received 111 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

10-12 initial, 24-26 mechanical all in by 3000 (total 34-38). The 16 vacuum is OK. All on 93 or better fuel.
Just my recommendation.
The following users liked this post:
drwet (12-22-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 03:39 PM
  #4  
cv67
Team Owner
 
cv67's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2004
Location: altered state
Posts: 81,242
Received 3,043 Likes on 2,602 Posts
St. Jude Donor '05

Default

You know youll have to experiment and give the engine what it wants but most heads with a nice chamber dont need a bunch of total. Bet 33-4 gets you real close .
The following users liked this post:
drwet (12-22-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 05:29 PM
  #5  
lars
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
lars's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 13,654
Received 4,926 Likes on 1,931 Posts

Default

16 - 20 initial. 34 total mechanical at about 3000 rpm. About 10 degrees of vacuum advance on manifold vacuum to produce actual timing at idle of about 30 and total combined maximum timing of about 44.

Lars
The following users liked this post:
drwet (12-22-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 06:02 PM
  #6  
drwet
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
drwet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 3,041
Received 538 Likes on 413 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lars
16 - 20 initial. 34 total mechanical at about 3000 rpm. About 10 degrees of vacuum advance on manifold vacuum to produce actual timing at idle of about 30 and total combined maximum timing of about 44.

Lars
Thanks everyone. This is when it would be nice to have access to a dyno. The numbers are all pretty close to what I had in mind. I was thinking the 16-18 initial, as well as the 34 by 3000. However, I have always shot for about 50-52 total with the vacuum advance. Why would you limit the total to around 44? (I should have added its a stick.)
Old 12-22-2018, 06:09 PM
  #7  
gkull
Team Owner
 
gkull's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 21,752
Received 1,331 Likes on 1,059 Posts

Default

I had a high dcr motor in my vette it would rattle ping going down the highway at light cruise throttle

the fix was the adjustable vacuum advance can turned down to the 8 10 range
Old 12-22-2018, 06:17 PM
  #8  
drwet
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
drwet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 3,041
Received 538 Likes on 413 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gkull
I had a high dcr motor in my vette it would rattle ping going down the highway at light cruise throttle

the fix was the adjustable vacuum advance can turned down to the 8 10 range
Thanks. I will keep that in mind. I didn't have a problem with 52 degrees total in the 383 and I've been running the same curve on the 427. What do you consider a high dynamic CR?
Old 12-22-2018, 06:34 PM
  #9  
gkull
Team Owner
 
gkull's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 21,752
Received 1,331 Likes on 1,059 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by drwet
Thanks. I will keep that in mind. I didn't have a problem with 52 degrees total in the 383 and I've been running the same curve on the 427. What do you consider a high dynamic CR?
I'd have to run all the numbers again, but it was up over 8.4. it was a 10.8 static with a 232/238 6 inch rod 3.750 stroke. It was always on the edge of detonation and the ultimate fix was to increase the cam duration dropping the DCR
Old 12-22-2018, 06:58 PM
  #10  
lars
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
lars's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 1999
Location: At my Bar drinking and wrenching in Lafayette Colorado
Posts: 13,654
Received 4,926 Likes on 1,931 Posts

Default

In addition to the dangers of part-throttle detonation when running more than 12 degrees-or-so vacuum advance (with total mechanical in the mid- 30's), modern fuels have a quicker burn rate than the fuels that these cars were originally designed for. Henry Olsen has done some excellent testing with the oil companies using a 5-gas analyzer to demonstrate that you do not want to run total combined timing in excess of 48 max. We see excellent results when staying within these limits.

Lars
The following users liked this post:
drwet (12-22-2018)
Old 12-22-2018, 07:00 PM
  #11  
Jebbysan
Dr. Detroit
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Jebbysan's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2012
Location: New Braunfels Texas
Posts: 9,963
Received 3,892 Likes on 2,564 Posts

Default

The 18 bushing in the MSD will get you 16-34....
How old are the heads? Newer fast burn chambers on aftermarket stuff want 34....that is where my own 406 is.....older heads will want the tried and true 36 degrees.....
Older being pre-2007 or so.......

Jebby

Last edited by Jebbysan; 12-22-2018 at 07:02 PM.
Old 12-22-2018, 08:15 PM
  #12  
drwet
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
drwet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 3,041
Received 538 Likes on 413 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lars
In addition to the dangers of part-throttle detonation when running more than 12 degrees-or-so vacuum advance (with total mechanical in the mid- 30's), modern fuels have a quicker burn rate than the fuels that these cars were originally designed for. Henry Olsen has done some excellent testing with the oil companies using a 5-gas analyzer to demonstrate that you do not want to run total combined timing in excess of 48 max. We see excellent results when staying within these limits.

Lars
Thanks. That makes sense. The fuels we have today bear little resemblance to those we had 30, 40, and 50 years ago. I don't suppose you have a link to Olsen's test results?
Old 12-22-2018, 08:17 PM
  #13  
drwet
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
drwet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 3,041
Received 538 Likes on 413 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jebbysan
The 18 bushing in the MSD will get you 16-34....
How old are the heads? Newer fast burn chambers on aftermarket stuff want 34....that is where my own 406 is.....older heads will want the tried and true 36 degrees.....
Older being pre-2007 or so.......

Jebby
Heads are ca 2017.
Old 12-22-2018, 09:42 PM
  #14  
v2racing
Melting Slicks
 
v2racing's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2008
Location: Spring Park MN
Posts: 2,666
Received 287 Likes on 236 Posts

Default

I'm at 34 degrees all in at 2600, 20 initial, with an adjustable vacuum advance limited to 8 degrees, but I'm running ported vacuum. I run the ported because my vacuum at idle is 9 inches in neutral and 7 in gear. When you put it in gear the vacuum drop lowers the advance which makes the engine idle speed drop which makes the vacuum drop which..... There is a great deal of difference in off idle response, and light throttle cruise as well as gas mileage with the ported vacuum hooked up.

I run 3/4 93 octane mixed with 1/4 100 street legal pump gas with my 11.8 to 1 compression. For straight 93 I still ran 34 total all in at 3000 but only 10 initial and vacuum advance limited to 6 degrees. It ran good on 93, but the mix allows me to kick the timing in quicker and really makes this thing come alive.

Mike

Last edited by v2racing; 12-22-2018 at 09:43 PM.
The following users liked this post:
drwet (12-23-2018)
Old 12-23-2018, 07:23 AM
  #15  
bjankuski
Safety Car
 
bjankuski's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2001
Location: Glenbeulah Wi
Posts: 3,991
Received 466 Likes on 369 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by drwet
I am about to pull the distributor (MSD Pro-Billet HEI) out of the '79 for a rebuild. Last time I had it out there was too much end play and I didn't have the right shims to correct it. I now have the parts, and I'm going to take the time to set it up properly. I have been setting up distributors for more years than I choose to remember, so I don't need advice on how to do it. What I would like however, is some opinions on what timing specs to use. My last engine was a 383 with a moderate cam (224/224), Trick Flow heads, and 9.5:1 compression. It seemed to like 14 deg initial, 34 deg total all in by 3000, and another 16 degrees of vacuum advance. My current engine is a 427 small block, AFR 220 heads, 10.25:1 compression, and a hydraulic roller cam with 233/241 duration. My inclination is to add a little more initial because of the longer duration camshaft, reduce the mechanical to stay with about 34 degrees total, and keep the 16 degrees of vacuum advance. This sound about right?
very good start position with the afr heads.

My go to is 20 degrees from zero to 2000 rpm and then ramp in from 2000 to 3000 rpm the additional timing to get to 32 degrees with afr hesds. Add vacuum on top of that, I usually limit total mechanical and vacuum to 45 degrees.
The following users liked this post:
drwet (12-23-2018)
Old 12-23-2018, 09:52 AM
  #16  
gkull
Team Owner
 
gkull's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 21,752
Received 1,331 Likes on 1,059 Posts

Default

Drwet, skip white racing makes turn key crate motors and go to their website and dig down to engine and cam specs. It will be an eye opener to most people of how big of h roller cam it takes to make something dyno tested over 600 hp from a 427 or 434 ci sbc
Old 12-23-2018, 09:44 PM
  #17  
drwet
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
drwet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 3,041
Received 538 Likes on 413 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gkull
Drwet, skip white racing makes turn key crate motors and go to their website and dig down to engine and cam specs. It will be an eye opener to most people of how big of h roller cam it takes to make something dyno tested over 600 hp from a 427 or 434 ci sbc
I had a look. Those are some big cams. The only change I would make to my engine were I to do it over might be to go with a slightly smaller cam. Don't get me wrong, it works great, but the idle can get a little annoying in traffic. I can't imagine what it would be like with 253/261 !
Old 12-24-2018, 01:51 PM
  #18  
cardo0
Le Mans Master
 
cardo0's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: Las Vegas - Just stop perpetuating myths please.
Posts: 7,098
Received 373 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by drwet
Thanks everyone. This is when it would be nice to have access to a dyno. The numbers are all pretty close to what I had in mind. I was thinking the 16-18 initial, as well as the 34 by 3000. However, I have always shot for about 50-52 total with the vacuum advance. Why would you limit the total to around 44? (I should have added its a stick.)
Without a dyno you might want to consider old school testing on a long slow inclined slope using seat of your pants for a performance gauge. Now to make it more scientific add a stop watch and a note pad to record your accelerations between 2 locations at the same starting speed. Next step up is a dashboard mounted accelerometer like the G-Tech (BTW made by Tesla) or there maybe copy cats dashboard accelerometers by now (G-Tech has been on the market over 20 years).

Something that lars made me realize years ago is to stop adding advance when power stops (or in this case accelerating) stops improving. Because below 3000 RPM you can add a whole lot of advance w/o any knock but it's just not good for your engine at all to run with excessive advance.

Hope this can help and good luck.
Old 12-25-2018, 05:49 PM
  #19  
drwet
Melting Slicks
Thread Starter
 
drwet's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2009
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 3,041
Received 538 Likes on 413 Posts

Default

In case anyone is interested I pulled the distributor today, shimmed it to .030" and set up the curve. I took a couple of degrees out of the mechanical advance, and set it to 16 deg. at idle. That gives me 34 deg. by 3000 rpm. Vacuum advance is 14 for a maximum of 48 degrees. Now I just have to wait around for 4 or 5 months to try it. Bring on the global warming!!

Get notified of new replies

To 427 Small Block timing specs




Quick Reply: 427 Small Block timing specs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 PM.