My Cross-breed Drive Train
Here's the stock cross member with the trans tail. Notice the bulge on the bottom of the tail shaft extension. That houses the VSS sensor.
Same thing, right side.
Same thing again, left side.
And here is all you need. A 3.25" X 2.75" X 1.125" thick block of aluminum. Socket head cap bolts were counter sunk and pressed in before relieving the block to clear the VSS. The 5.50" X 7/16" bolts go through the tail housing holes. I found the 1.125" thickness gave me the ideal 3 degrees of pinion angle.
Same thing, different view.
And here it is, all bolted up.
Left side view. Even the E-brake pulley clears.
It's a big transmission, but if my measurements are correct it should fit with very little modification to the trans tunnel and floor boards. The shiftier is 2" further back but a custom shiftier plate will take care of that.
Anybody see anything wrong here?
Or from this angle?
So there you have it, the drive train out of a 1991 C4 into a 1977 C3. I was even able to use the stock aluminum drive shaft out of the C4 with no modification!
Last edited by C3TPI; Jun 7, 2020 at 04:21 PM.
Thanks,
Kael





I'm not going to cut up the cross member because, in the rare insistence I do need to remove the trans, it is easier to just pull the engine and trans out together. The shifter lever can easily be removed from inside the car. That trans weighs 145 pounds and I don't want to have to wrestled it out from underneath. The clutch and flywheel are new, so I don't foresee that happening. Worse case scenario: I just get the saws all out.
As far as the floor is concerned, according to Twin Turbo, I should only have to cut out a place for the clutch hydrophilic slave cylinder. I took a lot of measurements before lifting the body and comparing the ZF with the T 10 and it should fit without changing anything but the shifter hole, which is centered rather than offset to the left.
So, why the ZF? I could have spent thousands of more dollars for a T 56 and still have to do as much or more modification. I purchased this L98 aluminum head, high compression engine with the ZF six speed plus all of the accessories (new alt, A/C compressor, starter, serpentine drive setup, TPI , clutch and flywheel) for $2,,000. The '91 C4 it came out of only had 90,000 miles on it. I reckon I would have spent north of $3,500 for a T 56 with the necessary conversion parts alone. Now, I don't know if you know much about this transmission, but it is know as one of the strongest overdrive manuals GM ever used. It is conservatively factory rated for 450 FPT but realistically 600. It has a very nice 2.68 first gear ratio with .75 and .50 overdrive ratios. You ought to see the size of the output shaft on these things. For far less dollars it is very comparable to the T 56. And besides, I am an old school hot rodder. That means taking what is available from the factory, the junk yard or what you have laying around and making something better from it. That is also why I purposely choose the L98 over a create motor or the ubiquitous LS engine. I would much rather see what I can engineer myself rather than buy a bunch of new parts and bolt them together, no offense to those that do.
Once I get my headers back from coating I will post pics of the whole chassis complete with drivetrian, exhaust and running gear on my build thread "Hello from Montana". Thank you for your continued support and most importantly, your observations and contributions.
Last edited by C3TPI; Jun 8, 2020 at 12:10 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





When somehow along the install the clutch line got kinked and had a pin hole leak...I modded the crossmember while the body was on- a LOT tougher... Just sayin
Richard
I know what you are saying about the cross member but I would rather not re-engineer everything right now. I don't have any internal hydro lines and everything inside of the bell housing is new. To pull the engine/trans combo together only takes five inches of forward movement of the engine. The shifter box is the same height as the rest of the trans, so no hang ups there. A saws all will fix the problem if it arises and then I can build a removable center section.
he was in Netherlands, and had a brother also on the forums.....
been a while, hope he/brother are OK......
he was in Netherlands, and had a brother also on the forums.....
been a while, hope he/brother are OK......
I currently have a large lack of knowledge and am always interested in why something is done differently than what the masses are doing.
Kael
GENE SLATER/MRVETTE......who knows, he maybe even remember me....15? years now??
Last edited by 7T1vette; Jun 9, 2020 at 06:38 PM.
Yes, there are still a lot of these transmissions out there. They never seem to ware out. Kinda like Ford Toploaders. The only drawback to the ZF's is that they came with a special dual mass flywheel that is no longer manufactured. I was lucky the flywheel and clutch assembly in my trans had been replaced and then very little used. It had a 1998 date stamp on it.
The reason for the dual mass design was because the ZF has more square cut gears then most transmissions which causes some vibration noise like a Muncie M22 "Rock Crusher" (thus the name). That is why they are so strong. However, both McLeod, Ram and others make a replacement single mass flywheel and clutch that fits the ZF setup and is reported to be pretty quiet. I wouldn't be concerned with a little gear noise myself. My Toploader in the Fairlane whines too. And Chevy guys would kill for a Rock Crusher.
Another feature I like about the ZF is the external hydraulic clutch slave cylinder. It is a pull type and doesn't interfere with headers or anything else. Both the slave cylinder and master cylinders are readily available for cheap. You may also have noticed in the photo's that I have the original T handle shifter setup on the trans. I was able to use the top parts of the original C3 handle and a piece of welding rod to adapt it to the ZF shifter and it even works the reverse lockout!
Last edited by C3TPI; Jun 10, 2020 at 11:05 AM.















