Back to roll cages again
I have been thinking more and more about installing a cage, not a roll bar but a full cage.
I want the rigidity that it provides plus I am starting to play harder and harder and want the protection.
I have built a number of cages in the past and the car really feels different afterwards. I particularly notice it pulling into driveways. The car feels really solid.
IN the past I have only built them of 1 5/8th stainless for good lucks and my pipe bender can do a good job on that size but they weight too much for my vet.
I am looking into chrome moly but the down side is the price and far worse HOW to weld??
Tig is the only solution that I know because you have to use 4340 wire as filler. Also tig is more controlled going around each joint.
A rear roll bar is simple because the frame is exposed in the wheel well and you can plate the frame on top and weld the bar to it.
I do want a full bar over the top of the windshield and comming down the window posts in front. I also want a bar through the floor connecting as far into the engine compartment as possible.
I also want side bars. They will have to be swing out, I am not going to crawl over any bar. The mustang has more room and the wife would not be impressed with climbing over a side bar regardless of how safe it is.
Bending chrome moly might also be a problem and until I can get a sample piece I don't know how good a job I could do.
George I would like some pictures of your full cage and repeat the other post on how it was mounted to the frame.
Thanks





Good luck
George has the only full cage that I know of, once again roll bars are easy. To me the hardest part is the front down tubes, keeping them close to the window pillar and trying to get them to blend in.
Fuel lines and brake lines need to be moved.
John this would be a winter project, I do not take the car apart this time of year. If would keep me busy this winter. I also have to be concerned with raising the car in the air for work underneath that the car is level, in it's normal position even when on blocks. I don't want the frame twisted and weld a cage in in this state.
Filler rod/wire is very important with chrome moly.
I wieghed stainless this morning and get 14 ounces to the foot. That is almost a pound for every foot of pipe. It adds up too fast for me.






This is an older picture but I was doing 4000 rpm in OD coming to work today on the freeway My speedo reads slightly fast. I've also driven it at 7000 rpm at Bonneville Salt flats with 300 mph rated tires
1000 7 12 20 29 0 0
1500 10 19 30 43 0 0
2000 13 25 41 58 0 0
2500 17 31 51 72 0 0
3000 20 37 61 87 0 0
3500 23 44 71 101 0 0
4000 26 50 81 116 0 0
4500 30 56 91 130 0 0
5000 33 62 101 145 0 0
5500 36 68 111 159 0 0
6000 40 75 122 174 0 0
6500 43 81 132 188 0 0
7000 46 87 142 203 0 0
7500 50 93 152 217 0 0
Last edited by gkull; Aug 27, 2004 at 11:52 AM.





With me it a personal safety item. I'd have it even if it wasn't required. I feel much better with it.
Norval - The front of the door bar which goes through the floor about mid calf. Required welding a 4X6 inch 3/8th plate to the bottom of the frame under the door with about 4X4 of it hanging inboard. So the cage pipe comes down on top of it on the inside of the frame rail
From just under the dash you put a pipe going forward nearly a straight shot that attaches to the frame rail just behind where the engine mount is.
I will have to look at the price of chrome moly vs mild steel and decide from there.
Also have to break the news to my wife that I want to deface the car with a cage. She hates the mustang now.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Here is why I am resisting putting one in my '67:
1) I see is the potential for damage to the interior when welding and fitting.
2) The loss of interior room.
3) Ingress/egress problems.
4) Cutting up the interior.
5) Movement of the body/fiberglass when driving.
6) Not being able to remove the body from the frame without cutting the cage out. So far I have removed the body from the frame on my '67 a total of 3 times.
I recently cut the roll cage out of my '69 Corvette in order to return the car to stock. What a pain in the butt getting it out! I experienced most of the above listed problems. I felt very confined while sitting in the car with the cage.
I would really like to see George's car in person to see what kind of job was done and how he lives with it on a daily basis.
Steve





Just explain to her about safety! I also think that it looks good. I have the swing out kit and I was going to just do the passenger side. I kind of like the fact that none of my bigger friends even ask to drive my car
632 - it's PITA and the upper hoop needs to be moved out because my helmet always hits the side bar.
My 5'4" wife - her feet actually don't reach the petals with my non adjustable racing seat.
Last edited by gkull; Aug 27, 2004 at 12:29 PM.





Getting in and out.
The windshield down bar makes it a reach around for lights and wipers switches.
Yes, you would have to cut the cage out to remove the body.
The top hoop is a compromise to allow room for the TTop handles.
Between the tall Sparco seat and the rear bars it makes for a really bad blind spot off the drivers rear quarter panel.
On my 3000 mile trips the front floor bar rides against of my calf and it gets to me after about 8-10 hours in the seat.
The worst thing is: The harness side to side bar is near the center so I can't fit a cooler or my slicks in back anymore.
George as for getting sore after 8-10 hours I have never ever driven that long. I look at 3 hours as a long trip.
I couldn't fit slicks in my car now.
I learned alot about welding chrome/moly today. NO NOTS. Do NOt use 4340 as a filler rod, use mild steel to prevent cracking. DO NOT mig weld it. It causes cracking problems. Tig it and use mild steel as a filler rod.
I was hopeing to put the top hoop in the groove on my T tops.
I would love pictures. My email address at home is nwilhelm@rogers.com Don't worry about the size, I like them big.
As for chrome moly vs mild steel, Mild steel is just that , mild, low densile strength. Moly is much stronger. 75 pounds is alot of weight. My complete 6 point mustang cage only weighs 75 pounds. The 1 5/8th tubing I normally use is 14 ounces to the foot so the weight can be eaily checked/calculated.
I would glass the bars to the floor, I will end up using standoffs from the frame through the floor and do the welding in the car rather then try directly to the frame.
I am fighting the idea of cutting up the car but I know it is something I should do for saftey and rigidity.
If the car was a unibody I would not hesitate, it would have been done years ago but it is glass and 2 piece so I am reluctant. I am running all the ideas around in my head, I really like the idea of standoffs through the floor, I know I can do a really good job of them, make them look professional.
It is still a long way until winter and the car is on blocks but I will continue to run the ideas through my head.
Have a nice evening
. That was George talking.George if you have some other shots of the cage I would love to see them also.
I never knew chrome moly wouldn't stand up. Talking to material guys they do nothing but praise moly. We build a mini indy car every year and all tubing is moly. Mild steel would make it easier to swallow the mistakes. Unless a tube is perfect I will not use it.
Thanks, Paul
Thanks, Paul
When I have a passenger my driving totally changes. The passenger is usually my wife and I want to impress her with nice safe driving. Alone I drive alot differently and that is when I need the cage.
In the catalogue I see tubing and it says D.O.M. What does this mean?? All the tubing is either .085, .065 or maximum .095. Is this thick enought to meet specs and if not why is it offered for race car buildups??





I have a stock 79 passenger folding seat for rear compartment access and the seat is actually lower. So as a passenger unless your 6' foot or better your head would not hit anyway.
My car is really only for fun and built around my 5'10 and 170 lbs










