350 Engine Mods asking for advice!
SO by keeping the muncie, and adding L98 TPI setup, using a MAP type system/computer and aftermarket chip...I doubles the fuel economy and made the car a fun thing to drive/own....
maybe not 320 hp or so, but not so very far off, as with dual exhausts, and so forth...it was improved over 250 anyway....
GENE
http://www.ryanscarpage.50megs.com/combos1.html
Better-flowing inlet (carb/intake/heads) and exhaust (heads/headers) won't matter much if the cam doesn't lift the valve off the seat much, and I'm figuring your stock '79 camshaft is something along the lines of:
.390" lift Intake/.401" lift Exhaust, with durations at .050" lift of 195* intake and 202* exhaust, respectively.
I'd think that a hydraulic cam with specs of approximately .420"-.450" lift, and duration at .050" lift in the .216*-.222* range (the old 327/350 HP L-79 "151" cam is very similar) would deliver a nice, torquey grunt, and a bit of a 'choppy' idle, perfect for cruising around town, without placing much stress on the valetrain, work well with your 3.55 gears and stock torque-converter, and deliver good performance, probably running mid/low 14-second 1/4-miles in the 94-97 MPH range.
Just my $.02-worth.....
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The idea of changing heads is to increase the engine's capacity to take in a fuel mixture and the spit it out. Even with a stock cam it should improve things; however, the cam will dictate as much as the heads. It's sounds like you have reasonable expectations. Installing a cam with more lift and duration along with heads, intake will make a significant difference. Like many other things in life there are bottlenecks. By changing one thing, something else becomes the botleneck. I would go with a cam similiar to the L-82. It's not all that radical and should perform decent in a street driven car. I don't have the specs but lift is in the .450 range and durartion anround 220 degrees.
When you have the bucks and time, a 383 stroker is the next step in my opinion. Wait till you need a bore job first. The cost to bore the block, fit new pistons etc is getting very close to the cost of the 383 and the performance will be MUCH better with the big cube small block. If my 350 in my Vette ever gets worn to the point where it need to be punched out, it will definately get stroked. The late C3 vettes are a perfect match for the torquey 383.
-Mark.
The GM 151 cam is a very good choice for a hydraulic cam. Better-flowing inlet (carb/intake/heads) and exhaust (heads/headers) won't matter much if the cam doesn't lift the valve off the seat much, and I'm figuring your stock '79 camshaft is something along the lines of:
.390" lift Intake/.401" lift Exhaust, with durations at .050" lift of 195* intake and 202* exhaust, respectively.
I'd think that a hydraulic cam with specs of approximately .420"-.450" lift, and duration at .050" lift in the .216*-.222* range (the old 327/350 HP L-79 "151" cam is very similar) would deliver a nice, torquey grunt, and a bit of a 'choppy' idle, perfect for cruising around town, without placing much stress on the valetrain, work well with your 3.55 gears and stock torque-converter, and deliver good performance, probably running mid/low 14-second 1/4-miles in the 94-97 MPH range.
Just my $.02-worth.....
The bottom end is stock L48, no issues so far... I have not dynoed it but I'm guessing it's well over 300HP at the crank.
Best ET
13.80 with a 1.91 60' at 97+mph
With open headers, shifting at 5800 RPM, on straight SUNOCO Ultra 94, it ran 13-teens @ 105 MPH in good air, usually 13.30s:
with an 8" converter and 28" x 10" Dragway Specials, it now runs 12-nineties @ 106 (best of 12.774 @ 109).
I drove this car to the track for 2 seasons, and still occasionally drive it around town (even with a spool...)

Hope this helps.....

Not sure about the stock heads, I think most of the power gain comes from the heads and the cam. I don't have the long tubes yet, these are probably good for 30HP (compared to the stock manifolds).
I do not think that the intake makes a huge difference, the cam is a good idea.
1st are you talking flywheel 300Hp or 300RWHP?
300Hp is only about 260rwhp. 300rwhp is about 350flywheel.
Also HOW much money are you wanting to spend?
And are you installing it yourself?
A good set of heads 1100.00
nice cam kit w/springs 300.00
nice RPM intake 150.00
set of decent headers 150.00
good carb 300.00
That 2K in parts... add about 500-600 labor you are there. Or buy a crate motor for a few hundred more?
Decide on how you want the end product to perfrom: Torque or HP.
For Torque, I suggest a tpi with alum heads with relatively small runners and a short duration cam such as a 268 or 272. Add headers with small primaries, 32" tubes, a 4-2-1- collector, 2.5" tubes with an X crossover and hi flo mufflers and you'll be a happy camper. Later, rebuild the bottom end to 383 and you won't be able to wipe the smile off your face up to 5000 rpm.
For HP, try a miniram with a 58mm throttle body, alum heads with larger runners (200+) and a cam in the 280s. Add headers with larger primaries, shorter tubes, 4-2-1 collectors, 2.5" (or even 3") pipes with X crossover and Edelbrock RPM muffs and you'll be happier at the track. Add the 383 and the correct trans/rear end gear package and you'll compete with anyone.
In either case, I like speed density with a chip from a reputable aftermarket chip burner. If possible, get a curve plot from a dyno, send the results to the chip burner and he can custom burn one for you.
I like tpi over aftermarket EFI since they are plentiful (read - cheap)and since the next owner of your Vette may not be able to tune it himself and may need to take it to GM for service.






















