When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The builder of my motor has proclaimed my motor is completed, however the cam he said he installed is bigger than the one we agreed upon. The motor is a 10:5.1 383 with ported Canfield heads,etc. subject on occasion to a max 200 shot. It'll have an auto trans behind it.
After discussing my use of the vehicle and the combo he recommended the XR288H(236/242@.050) which I agreed to. I wanted to go with the XR282H(230/236@.050) for added driveability but I trusted his experience. His email said he put the XR294H(242/248@.050) in the motor.
I don't think I'll be able to live with that cam on the street on a daily basis. I do drive all my vehicles regularly. From a strictly performance/driveability (not principal) aspect should I go ahead with the bigger cam or have him put in the smaller one?
The 294 shows 2800-6100 RPMs vs. 2500-6000 RPMs for the 288. It also says the 294 needs 9.5 to 1 comp ratio, so you've got that covered. I think it really comes down to torque converter & gearing. 3000+ stall is recommended for the 294 and 3000 for the 288.
If you've posted your stall & rear gears I can't remember what they are. If you post that I'll bet somebody will have an informed opinion. It's a crapshoot when you call Comp Cams Techline as to how well schooled the guy you get will be but it couldn't hurt to check there before you decide. I will say that the XS282 solid flat tappet that I run in my 11 to 1 comp. ratio 355 w/ 4.10 gears has a bit more duration and still has good throttle response with very strong mid-range & top end. Good luck.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Mine has the same duration and a litte more lift and is great on the street I don't have any problems I can still tool around at 2000RPM in 4th gear even though the power range of the cam is 2500-6500RPMs. I am not sure how that relates to hydraulic roller with an automatiic though
From: Pettis Performance 565 with two stages of Nitrous Supply nitrous 1.082, 4.61 at 155, 7.17 at 192
Need stall and rear end gear info. That is a relatively big cam, but not out of the ball park. That being said I would probably opt for the smaller cam.
From: Pettis Performance 565 with two stages of Nitrous Supply nitrous 1.082, 4.61 at 155, 7.17 at 192
Originally Posted by gkull
I vote for way to much cam for a little 383. This is not a roller cam guys and even if it was IMO 240+ intake duration isn't a good idea.
Yup and it is a hydraulic which "acts" around 6 degrees bigger than the solids it is being comparred to. Unless he has a lot of stall and gear it is too big.
I vote for way to much cam for a little 383. This is not a roller cam guys and even if it was IMO 240+ intake duration isn't a good idea.
I agree that he's out near the edge on duration- close call IMHO. But it is a roller cam- it's in their "Extreme Energy" Hydraulic Roller category. I think he just didn't add the "HR" at the end which shows it to be a hydraulic roller. The correct part number is XR294HR.
The cams Nastee has listed XR282-288-294 are all hydraulic roller cams. I have a XR276HR (not installed yet) but I do agree the 294 may be a bit much. I would assume it would have a pretty rough idle and low vacuum.
The trans/converter is an ART CARR "Extreme 700R4" with a 9.5" billet 3000 rpm stall lockup converter. And the cam choices are all hydraulic rollers. The vehicle it's going into will weigh about 3300 lbs without driver. The gears are 3:73's. Does this info alter any opinions? I got a response from him explaining his rationale which seems reasonable. He did offer to change it if I wanted to.
Last edited by nastee383; Dec 5, 2004 at 10:09 PM.
I run a Comp XE-284(flat tappet hydraulic) with 1.60 rockers and drive it daily.Idle is at 650 in gear,and it will pull to 6500 easily in first and second. I run a 2200 stall with my 700r4,and have no issues with drivability.To be honest I was concidering a higher stall converter,but the builder talked me out of it. He claimed the higher stall would run hotter(due to slippage) and if not raced,would only hurt me in the long run. I've since discovered I can not full throttle launch,due to traction limits,and even with the "wrong converter" can burn P295-50's from a 25 mph roll.
I guess what I'm trying to say is the cam/combination you have is fine if you want a hot street performer.If you wanted a smooth idling fast car,buy a C-5.
I guess what I'm trying to say is the cam/combination you have is fine if you want a hot street performer.If you wanted a smooth idling fast car,buy a C-5.
C-5's are now second class citizens which is a good thing. Now they will shut their Pie holes
Naste - I wish that i had my 427 installed and running, because that's the cam I have in it. It's the XE294HR. Only I'm running solid rollers on it with Comp Cams advised .012 lash. I didn't want to think about 6200-6500 red line because of heavy HR induced valve float.
I also ask for an Art Carr 9.5 inch three clutch lockup converter, but when I was testing it it was more like 3500.