C4 Tech/Performance L98 Corvette and LT1 Corvette Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine

Be Cool radiator, not impressed!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2005 | 10:39 AM
  #41  
tjwong's Avatar
tjwong
Le Mans Master
Supporting Lifetime Gold
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,596
Likes: 19
From: Portland Oregon
Default

Originally Posted by GeosFun
TJ,
For what it is worth, I had about a 480FWHP, 496 cu inch carburated engine in my 1971 GMC 3/4 ton (original 401 BBC truck) and it always ran normal engine temps (it gets plenty hot here in Redding in the summers, like 105 to 112+). Mine also had air and power steer/power brakes/TH400 transmission. All it had was a fan shroud around the mechanical fan. I do not know the differences between the two year's radiators. The 502 should run cool.

I think we may have found the problem. That integrated fan shround with the twin fans is causing an air flow restriction. The aluminum shrould looks pretty but it is totally enclosed with the exception of the cutouts for the two fans. I spoke to the Northern engineer yesterday and they have redisigned the shroud by louvering it. Their suggestion is that I return it or have the shroud louvered locally at their cost. Today I am going to remove the shroud and install the single fan that I had on the engine before, drive and see what it does.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #42  
bogus's Avatar
bogus
Team Owner
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 40,156
Likes: 45
From: San Pedro CA
Default

I have to admit, it's amazing what happens to a cars cooling system once a shroud has been messed with.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #43  
bacardioil's Avatar
bacardioil
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Perth Amboy N.J.
Default

i run 93 lt1 s/c stock rad. 160 stat fans kick on at 187. on highway in 100 degrees outside, i run 178. in traffic a/c on never see 200. a proper single core rad. will cool better then a 2 core. bar none. no garbage on ect. clean and in good condition.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 05:49 PM
  #44  
Tom@Dewitt's Avatar
0Tom@Dewitt
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,593
Likes: 631
From: Brighton
Default

Originally Posted by bacardioil
i run 93 lt1 s/c stock rad. 160 stat fans kick on at 187. on highway in 100 degrees outside, i run 178. in traffic a/c on never see 200. a proper single core rad. will cool better then a 2 core. bar none. no garbage on ect. clean and in good condition.
That's not true, period. GM recently asked us to build a double row radiator for the new 2006 Z06 because they were having trouble cooling down 500 hp at the milford track. We did one and they reported a 22 degree drop. That's the facts.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 06:49 PM
  #45  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by Tom DeWitt
Think about this for a second...if the flow is too fast through the radiator to remove the heat, then why isn't it too fast to pick up the heat from the engine?
BINGO!!!

That old "wives tail" has been floating around forever. I first heard it as an argument as why not to remove a thermostat. It STILL is a bad idea to remove the stat, but not because the coolant won't be in the radiator long enough to cool.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 06:51 PM
  #46  
cv67's Avatar
cv67
Team Owner
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 81,241
Likes: 3,063
From: altered state
St. Jude Donor '05
Default

IMO a larger radiator needs a stronger fan to truly realize its cooling potential unless you have a large grill opening to force the air through which the vette doesn't. Otherwise it would act as a "big radiator with too small of a fan, no?"How can it move enough air over the increased area to scrub off heat? I say upgrade the fan system, makes sense.

By the way, there's nothing wrong with having a motor run at 180 or so. The only reason GM has them running that hot is for emissions, that's it!

Heck, look at Joe Sherman;he built a 600 hp sb that holds an oil temp of 150. Didn't hear of anyfailure...Back on topic-

Last edited by cv67; Aug 24, 2005 at 07:02 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #47  
JoBy's Avatar
JoBy
Melting Slicks
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 303
From: Timra, Sweden
Default

Let us start with a few facts.

* You have heat transfer from the water to the radiator core.
* You have heat transfer from the radiator core to the air passing thru it.
* The amout of heat transfered depends on the contact area and the temperature differance.
* The 'water' side of the radiator is almost never a problem because the heat flows very easy from the water to the radiator core. The radiator core temp and the water temp will be almost identical.

Let us assume that we have a constant flow of air thru the radiator.
If you have a slow flowing water then it will spend a long time in the radiator and be cool when exiting the radiator.
With higher water flow it will spend less time in the radiator and it will be hotter at the other end.
When is the most heat removed?
WRONG !!! You remove more heat when you have the higher water flow! Removing 5 degrees from thee gallons is better than removing 10 degrees from one gallon.
The reson is the temperature differance. With the slower moving water you get less temperature differance between the air and the colder side of the radiator. By increasing water flow you keep the 'colder' side of the radiator hot, and that means that more heat is transferd to the air at that side.

It is the same thing as the 'air' part of the radiator. You want as much air flow as possible, and as cold air as possible to remove the most heat. Slowing the air down will raise the air temp behind the radiator, but that does not mean that more heat is removed.

A thicker radiator core can transfer more heat from water to air, but you might need higher water flow to make the most of it. If it cools down the water by the time the water is half way thru the radiator, then the other half does not remove much heat. This situation will WASTE half the air flow ... By speeding up the water flow to keep the whole radiator warm you use all the air availabe to remove heat.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 08:24 PM
  #48  
steve40th's Avatar
steve40th
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 9,922
Likes: 38
From: South Carolina
St. Jude Donor '03 & '05
Default

Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
IMO a larger radiator needs a stronger fan to truly realize its cooling potential unless you have a large grill opening to force the air through which the vette doesn't. Otherwise it would act as a "big radiator with too small of a fan, no?"How can it move enough air over the increased area to scrub off heat? I say upgrade the fan system, makes sense.

By the way, there's nothing wrong with having a motor run at 180 or so. The only reason GM has them running that hot is for emissions, that's it!

Heck, look at Joe Sherman;he built a 600 hp sb that holds an oil temp of 150. Didn't hear of anyfailure...Back on topic-
Agree, Get SPAL fans to get the extra airflow, they are used on Ferraris and Lambos, so they must feed in a large amount of air in a small place.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-1

10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 11:45 PM
  #49  
Vette Threat's Avatar
Vette Threat
Burning Brakes
25 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 48
Default

-Electric Water pump
-Be Cool Rad
-Fans both on
-160F thermostat

160F-175F depending if I'm just idling or driving it hard.

For me to hit 180F it has to be really hot AND I have to rev the snot out of it.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 09:52 AM
  #50  
Don&Kelly's Avatar
Don&Kelly
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 4
From: Dallas / Fort Worth, Texas Texas
Default

I installed a "Be Cool" radiator in my '81 and it keeps the C3 cool on even the hottest days with the A/C on - I have small dual electric fans and have had no heating problems at all (I could not say this with my stock radiator, it got hot as hell in the summer).
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 11:01 AM
  #51  
UWEBABY's Avatar
UWEBABY
Pro
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: TEMECULA CALIFORNIA
St. Jude Donor '06-'07-'08-'09
Default

[QUOTE=SunCr] If anything, it drags the alternator down and if you're using the stock alternator, it's probably putting out a measly 30 amps at idle - not enough for both fans, the a/c on high and everthing else. Once the volts go, the fans slow down and the temps go up. Since all is new, I'd verify the dash readout by scanning it and comparing it to the CTS. )

THAT'S AN INTERESTING THOUGHT. I NOTICED LAST WEEK THAT WHEN BOTH OF THE RADIATOR FANS WERE ON IN TRAFFIC THAT THE
A/C FAN LOST POWER . SO THEN, LIKEWISE, THE RADIATOR FANS WOULD NOT OPERATE AS EFFICIENTLY. HOW DOES ONE CHECK TO SEE IF THE ALT IS A HIGH OUTPUT VERSION OR NOT? AND ANY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ONE?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 07:50 PM
  #52  
SJW's Avatar
SJW
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,348
Likes: 2,272
From: Central Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by JoBy
Let us start with a few facts.

* You have heat transfer from the water to the radiator core.
* You have heat transfer from the radiator core to the air passing thru it.
* The amout of heat transfered depends on the contact area and the temperature differance.
* The 'water' side of the radiator is almost never a problem because the heat flows very easy from the water to the radiator core. The radiator core temp and the water temp will be almost identical.

Let us assume that we have a constant flow of air thru the radiator.
If you have a slow flowing water then it will spend a long time in the radiator and be cool when exiting the radiator.
With higher water flow it will spend less time in the radiator and it will be hotter at the other end.
When is the most heat removed?
WRONG !!! You remove more heat when you have the higher water flow! Removing 5 degrees from thee gallons is better than removing 10 degrees from one gallon.
The reson is the temperature differance. With the slower moving water you get less temperature differance between the air and the colder side of the radiator. By increasing water flow you keep the 'colder' side of the radiator hot, and that means that more heat is transferd to the air at that side.

It is the same thing as the 'air' part of the radiator. You want as much air flow as possible, and as cold air as possible to remove the most heat. Slowing the air down will raise the air temp behind the radiator, but that does not mean that more heat is removed.

A thicker radiator core can transfer more heat from water to air, but you might need higher water flow to make the most of it. If it cools down the water by the time the water is half way thru the radiator, then the other half does not remove much heat. This situation will WASTE half the air flow ... By speeding up the water flow to keep the whole radiator warm you use all the air availabe to remove heat.
This is correct.

While speeding up the flow of coolant through the radiator will cause each molecule of coolant to spend less time in the core shedding heat, it will also cause more molecules to flow through the core. This must be kept in mind when considering the thermal dynamics involved.

It also should be remembered that the true objective is to transfer heat from the engine to the atmosphere. Moving coolant through the radiator very slowly will allow each molecule of liquid that passes through the core to shed more heat, but there will be a corresponding reduction in the amount of heat that the liquid absorbs from the engine, as a result of the reduced rate of flow.

Be well,

SJW
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #53  
CFI-EFI's Avatar
CFI-EFI
Race Director
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,298
Likes: 33
From: The Top of Utah
Default

Originally Posted by SJW
This is correct.

Moving coolant through the radiator very slowly will allow each molecule of liquid that passes through the core to shed more heat, but there will be a corresponding reduction in the amount of heat that the liquid absorbs from the engine, as a result of the reduced rate of flow.
Too bad this isn't.

If "Moving coolant through the radiator very slowly will allow each molecule of liquid that passes through the core to shed more heat", then conversely, Moving coolant through the engine very slowly will allow each molecule of liquid that passes through the block and heads to absorb more heat.

Remember, too, that part of the ability of the coolant to absorb or reject heat is dependent on the difference in temps. If the coolant gets cooler by traveling more slowly through the radiator, then it will be able to absorb more heat from the engine, first because it was cooler going in and second because it was in there longer.

If the time in the radiator is increased, so will the time in the engine.

RACE ON!!!
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 09:17 PM
  #54  
1bdvet's Avatar
1bdvet
Team Owner
Veteran: Air Force
St. Jude 20 Year Donor
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 53,729
Likes: 5,613
From: Plantation Florida USAF(Retired) 1966-1990
U.S. Air Force
St. Jude Donor '05 thru '26
NCM Sinkhole Donor
Default

Yous Run Like My Car Does, Nice To Know My Car Is Normal.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #55  
kpforce1's Avatar
kpforce1
Burning Brakes
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
From: Louisville KY
Default

Originally Posted by CFI-EFI
Too bad this isn't.

If "Moving coolant through the radiator very slowly will allow each molecule of liquid that passes through the core to shed more heat", then conversely, Moving coolant through the engine very slowly will allow each molecule of liquid that passes through the block and heads to absorb more heat.

Remember, too, that part of the ability of the coolant to absorb or reject heat is dependent on the difference in temps. If the coolant gets cooler by traveling more slowly through the radiator, then it will be able to absorb more heat from the engine, first because it was cooler going in and second because it was in there longer.

If the time in the radiator is increased, so will the time in the engine.

RACE ON!!!
Thermo Dynamics.... ugh, stop. You all are reminding me of that god awfull class in college. This is a great thread though... very good discussion. Close to *sticky* material.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 10:52 PM
  #56  
CentralCoaster's Avatar
CentralCoaster
Team Owner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 24,337
Likes: 25
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Default

Mine creeps up to 228-230 with the stock rad, but as soon as the fan fires up, it drops like a rock.

I also have an override switch wired to both fans, but I never need that in traffic, only at the track.. I'll leave the car running, idling, and the fans will pull it all the way down to 185 (I have a 180 tstat)
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 10:55 PM
  #57  
CentralCoaster's Avatar
CentralCoaster
Team Owner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 24,337
Likes: 25
From: San Diego , CA Double Yellow DirtBags 1985..Z51..6-speed
Default

Originally Posted by kpforce1
Thermo Dynamics.... ugh, stop. You all are reminding me of that god awfull class in college. This is a great thread though... very good discussion. Close to *sticky* material.

Moving the water faster WILL help. But, what CFI said is very true, and often overlooked. It's just not that simple. To see why it helps, you'll have to understand LMTD (log mean temperature difference). Joby touches on this when he talks about the temperature on the cold side of the radiator.

Last edited by CentralCoaster; Aug 26, 2005 at 10:58 PM.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Be Cool radiator, not impressed!

Old Aug 26, 2005 | 11:16 PM
  #58  
Scott-89's Avatar
Scott-89
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 0
From: North Central Indiana
Default

I wish mine would run a bit cooler. When I am stuck in traffic, mine gets up to about 228 or so and I start getting squimish. I am not sure what is normal for an 89 with auto trans at 85 degrees, but I would like it to be lower.

At what point should we start to worry, temp wise ?

Also there is a piece of smooth plastic under the filter inlet box. It seems like it is there to "buffer" any movement so that the air box doesn't wear away at the piece underneath.

I am new to all of this obviously but I am curious and I know from lurking on these formus, that all of you are the most knowledgeable people on the subject.

Thank you all for the comraderie.

Not trying to Hijack the thread. I am just interested in cooler engine temps. I don't have to worry about emission testing at the moment. We don't have anything like that in Indiana. I just want to make sure I am not doing any damage while I am waiting for the Car Hops to bring out my Hot Dogs

Last edited by Scott-89; Aug 26, 2005 at 11:20 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #59  
Don&Kelly's Avatar
Don&Kelly
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 4
From: Dallas / Fort Worth, Texas Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Scott-89
I wish mine would run a bit cooler. When I am stuck in traffic, mine gets up to about 228 or so and I start getting squimish. I am not sure what is normal for an 89 with auto trans at 85 degrees, but I would like it to be lower.

At what point should we start to worry, temp wise ?

Also there is a piece of smooth plastic under the filter inlet box. It seems like it is there to "buffer" any movement so that the air box doesn't wear away at the piece underneath.

I am new to all of this obviously but I am curious and I know from lurking on these formus, that all of you are the most knowledgeable people on the subject.

Thank you all for the comraderie.

Not trying to Hijack the thread. I am just interested in cooler engine temps. I don't have to worry about emission testing at the moment. We don't have anything like that in Indiana. I just want to make sure I am not doing any damage while I am waiting for the Car Hops to bring out my Hot Dogs
That's what our '81 was doing - we added the Be Cool Radiator & puff, it has never ever over heated again..

My friend put a Be Cool in his Big Block '70 & since he did that - racing or not, it never overheats.

Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 11:36 PM
  #60  
Scott-89's Avatar
Scott-89
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 0
From: North Central Indiana
Default

According to my codes I have a better radiator. It does great when just tooling around town but it seems to be a bit hot ( well to me anyway ) when I have to sit for a few minutes.

I have a 66 GTO as well and it doesn't seem to run near as hot as my new addition. I think I just need to get used to the fact that they are made to run a tad more hot to help with emissions. I might just try a lower temp thermo and fix the fans to come on a little sooner and see what happens.

I think I just have a little Stage Freight as it were. I have a good apptitude for all things computer related and think I will like to expand on my knowledge with the inner workings.

I am just used to the old school engines and have never made the connection between computer and car.. I will just do some studying and try to combine the 2.

Last edited by Scott-89; Aug 26, 2005 at 11:43 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM.

story-0
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-2
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-5
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-6
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-8
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE