When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I just barely passed the emissions test IM240 composite fast pass ( no idea what that means). HC was 0.393 and the limit was 0.407. CO was 0.690 and the limit was 3.804. The test is on a dyno. I have a CAT and AIR pump. It fails without them. Does anyone have any results they can share. The car is an 85 without a cold start valve so I know it’s not leaking and the Ford injectors are only a couple of years old. I am wondering why HC is so close.
If you FAST PASS in Illinois that good. I was told that the numbers that appear on a fast pass do not mean much. My 1985 has fast passed the last three times.
Not to hi-jack your thread, but we don't have emission testing here in downstate Illinois. I was curious is it just Cook County that has testing or does it encompass a larger area?
I JUST passed the emissions on my 88 vert last week, the HC were just under the limit ( I don't have the numbers in front of me right now ). The mechanic said that it was probably due to the new plugs and wires I had installed and the computer was still learning. I certainly hope he's right, I will know in two years from now!
the air pump does nothing once the engine is hot. So it will have little effect on the numbers.
As for high HCs? I would suspect the cats are not up to snuff.
Do they do a visual? If not, I would ditch the pre-cats and get a highflow main cat.
which FMS injectors did you use? If you used the 24# units on that engine, without an AFPR, it would cause a rich condition. So would a sluggish O2 sensor. If your plugs are a bit old, that would contribute.
Your'e right, that was close!! Curious to hear more on this. Seems these vettes are always close or are failing, mine included. Its been told to me repeatedly to decarbon the TB and intake (using seafoam) to help.
Just a few weeks ago I smogged my vette and one of the limits was really really close.
Without looking at the sheet I can't tell you which thing it was but the range max is something like 1324 and mine was 1322, It was the same last time I smogged it too.
I've got to go do my '89 soon as well. I was really close the last time too - HC limit is 200ppm and my car registered 149ppm. That was at idle; HC limit at 2500rpm is the same as idle (200ppm) but my car registered only 22ppm.
The mechanic said it was nothing that a good tune-up wouldn't take care of. But the car had new Mobile 1 15W-50 oil and oil filter (after performing an engine flush), the AC Delco plugs where only a couple of years old and I checked their gap only a few days earlier, it had a brand new K&N air filter (with cut lid), and I had just adjusted the timing to factory spec. Other than replacing the plug wires, what else could I have done to 'tune' it up?
But a pass is a pass. Hopefully, when I take it in this time, it will pass again. Once the car becomes 20 years old, it won't have to go through any more emissions tests.
I did the 93 i just bought and was suspicious of the results as i was pretty much as far from the limit as you can get on everything. Seemed a little too "clean"
I just had my 89 emissions checked -- FOR THE LAST TIME (Ohio is eliminating emissions testing in my county).
I eliminated the pre-cats 10 years ago but all other emissions devices are hooked up. I passed on the second try -- the EGR valve was stuck open on the first try and I failed for NOx. Fortunately, I was able to fix the issue with a ball peen hammer and a socket extension. However, I did use this as a justification to replace the 12 yr. old. Mallory plug wires with MSD wires and change the plugs, cap, rotor, and PCV valve. The oil was changed about a month ago. Base timing is 12 deg.
My numbers are as follows:
HC -- 79.5 ppm (152 ppm limit)
CO -- 0.08% (0.97% limit)
CO2 -- 12.73%
NOx -- 801 ppm (1082 ppm limit)
Last edited by Z51L9889; Jul 29, 2005 at 09:40 PM.
the air pump does nothing once the engine is hot. So it will have little effect on the numbers.
As for high HCs? I would suspect the cats are not up to snuff.
Do they do a visual? If not, I would ditch the pre-cats and get a highflow main cat.
which FMS injectors did you use? If you used the 24# units on that engine, without an AFPR, it would cause a rich condition. So would a sluggish O2 sensor. If your plugs are a bit old, that would contribute.
The GM manual say the air pump feeds the cat when the engine is in closed loop. The cat has two sections and the air pump feed the reaction in the second half. I didn’t try the test without the pump. We only get 2 free tests then it’s $20 a test. Mine is an 85 so I only have the main cat and it’s a new Magnaflow.
I used the FMS 21# injectors and adjusted the injector constant to give good BLM’s. I have a 165 ECM. I have a new wideband O2 with a simulated narrow band output driving the ECM. It’s not rich.
I did find the document that defines the IM240 fast test. Basically after 30 seconds there are tables they use to determine the limits for every second from 30 to 240 for different years. If your car is under these limits it passes and the test is stopped. My car passed after 31 seconds. Now I know that is as fast as it could pass.
Check out the innovate wb sold in summit. THey are around 350 got one that I am using with my DFI and it too can simulate a narrowband, it can log and it has addons that you can log RPM with it. Very nice unit with the cheaper wb02 sensor. My tech edge I had, that Dad is using in the chevelle now, cost over 350 dollar by itself!
If you need some information just let me know. It can hold the logs and you can download them onto your PC when you get home and plot them out with their software. I never did that since the DFI does all that for me.
A few nice things about the Zeitronix Zt-2 is it is very small, uses the cheaper Bosch sensor, comes with an input for RPM, TPS. You can plot A/F, RPM, TPS and use this graph to tune your chip. I found it very easy. I have mine hooked up all the time. One down side is you need a PC running in your car to see/collect log data.