Ign Coil Module any ideas????
Bogus has been helping as well.
93 LT1 Auto. Had a roughness and appearance of a mis-fire. Code show DTC 41.
When the engine reach ops temp 204 or so, it would die, let it cool down 20 degrees it would start back up until it got to temp again.
Traced it down to the ignition coil module. (Coil is new too). Replaced with a new GM module. It won't start just cranks. Probed all wires to coil, ground and ECM all good continuity.
Plugged in the old module it starts at first touch of the starter. Ordered another new module installed it this morning same thing. It cranks but won't fire. Plugged the old module in it fires.
Any ideas? I'm at maximum frustration on this.
I had Chris verify the pn on the module and it is correct.
This is my second one in two days. PN 10483131 if my memory is correct.
I took both the old and new module to NAPA and had them tested. Both test ok.
What in the heck is going on????????
Man that sucks. Only thought I can come up with is corrosion in your connections.A little electrical cleaner mabey? Or mabey a connector is just not making good contact.Good LuckI assume you checked for spark and have none right?
Man that sucks. Only thought I can come up with is corrosion in your connections.A little electrical cleaner mabey? Or mabey a connector is just not making good contact.Good LuckI assume you checked for spark and have none right?
I took it out for a test drive around and around my subdivision (didn't want to go to far) and finally it started to misbehave. It had a roughness to the idle at first, but after a number of time up and down the street the first symptom was the tach started jumping. I quickly headed back to the house, while heading back down my street the tach started jumping wildly. Pulled into the garage let it idle for a minute the temp was about 212, and I rev'd it a couple times the tach was going from 0-redline and then it started stumbling I brought it up to about 1000 rpms for a few seconds then it started cutting out and died. I restarted it, it started right up for about 2 seconds and died. I repeated this a couple of times and each of those it would just start and die.
I shut it down and pulled codes. BTW I never got an SES lamp or anything else beside what I described above.
Codes were clear before I started all this too. The codes for A-G were: 1.0 C12, 4.0 H41, and 9.0 ---
Then for A-B a 1-2 for the start of the sequence followed by a 4-1 then a 1-2 indicating the end.
The more I dig into to this the more I'm getting confused.
The way I'm interpreting this is the 4.0 display is an ECM DTC 41 followed by the ECM (A-B) a 41. Which is an Ignition Control Circuit (open or short circuit).
I just don't understand what is going on.
Yes when its running it seems 95% fine. During all my testing I did check continuity on all wires coming from the ECM, to ground, and the two going to the coil.
There has to be an answer some where as to what is going on.
I really need help. I'm renting a car right now as this is my only car.
The new module will not fire the engine. Neither of those new modules would fire the engine. Only the old one will fire then engine.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
The modules are identical.
I don't know what to do next. Any normal person would have dumped this car long ago considering the amount of money I've had to put into it. The situation is now critical and today I'm going to evaluate the very possibility of taking a huge loss and dumping it, ending my Corvette ownership. I never thought I'd give this car up but this is at a point where it may be the end of the line.
There's always aftermarket injection as well. Cranktrigger maybe, but the block will still accept a distributor if you want and there's a guy that will modify the manifold for you.
The ignition control modules from '92 to '96 have the same connectors and look the same, but once again, they are different by some years.
There is a big difference in the '96 coil and ignition module from previous years and they should always be used in a set -- that is, you could plug a '96 ignition module into a '92 system, but you should not do it.
The point of all this is:
Are you sure you have the correct ignition module and coil combination?
From '92 to '95 the look identical, but you should not mix them.
Tom Piper
The ignition control modules from '92 to '96 have the same connectors and look the same, but once again, they are different by some years.
There is a big difference in the '96 coil and ignition module from previous years and they should always be used in a set -- that is, you could plug a '96 ignition module into a '92 system, but you should not do it.
The point of all this is:
Are you sure you have the correct ignition module and coil combination? From '92 to '95 the look identical, but you should not mix them.
Tom Piper
I know 92/23 had the same module, 94/95/96 uses a common module but different than the 92/93 model years, coils will all work between 92 and 95. Coils in 96 had a single 4 pin connector versus the dual connector of the preceeding years.
I really appreciate all of your thoughts on this matter. I know you all have such a wealth of knowledge.
Brian, I appreciate the thought, but I don't have that kind of money to make major modifications. I just want my stock engine to run. When I initially called the dealer that I usually use, the service advisor kept saying its the opti spark. I don't agree with that. In fact they replaced the water pump and opti not but less than 3 yrs ago to the tune of over $1300. And of course they don't warranty that. I'm very concerned about taking to the dealer when they have preconceived notions without listening to the issues.
When it is cold, with the old control module, it fires right up at first touch of the starter. Plug the new on in, and all it does is crank. With the old one in it has a very pronounced roughness to the engine up through about 1500 rpm. If you rev' it, it seems normal. Once it comes up to temp and you run it just a bit then all hell breaks loose, the tach goes wacky, it starts stumbling and dies.
I'm just sick over this. I know I'll get reamed if I attempt to trade it in especially with it not running. Its sad because I have invested so much money to restore it to practically new condition. At $60. a day I can't keep renting a car either. Something has to happen today or tomorrow. I can't afford to be reamed be the dealer for $1000's of dollars either.
Tom Piper
I checked the continuity from each pin of the connecctor, white wire to ECM, Black to ground, Pink/black and white to coil. All showed good continuity.
I'm thinking about ordering a new ECM computer and another control module as my last resort. I asked about the wire harness but that is not available. How would one repair a marginal connector like that in this case?
The '96 coil has a much lower primary resistance -- a hotter coil.
A hotter coil logically would need a different driver.
Tom Piper
This does away with all the guess work.
Tom Piper
and we are no closer to getting it running.
The heat soak led me to the Coil Driver/Ignition Module... it would heat up and die. Then, when passed through the various test light troubleshooting instructions for the C41, the module made sense.
It could also be the coil... once it heats up, it loses resistance on the primary side, and all hell breaks loose.
One item from a PM, every so often, the AC would go from cold to hot, the ASR and ABS lights would come on and a CCM C41 would appear. This is telling me that something is wrong with the serial data line somewhere between the CCM and the EBCM and the AC programmer.
However, if the CCM dies, even whilst driving, the car will continue to run just fine! It's when you go to restart that the problems ensue.
Another thought - there have been some posts regarding AC voltage leaking from the alternator... that might be worth checking into.
This does away with all the guess work.
Tom Piper
I'm not sure I completely understand what your saying though. Nevertheless, I suppose this is something the dealer woudl do I guess.
















