Torque settings for Runners needed please
Sep 23, 2005 | 08:09 PM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane Queensland, Australia
Torque settings for Runners needed please
Hi;
The Haynes manual I have doesn't seem to list what I need, which is;
Torque settings for Runners to intake manifold
&
Torque settings for Runners to plenum, both for my '85.
I'm guessing they'll be in the vicinity of anywhere from 15 - 25lbf
...I doubt they'd say 30flb for this application.
Sep 23, 2005 | 08:15 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 40,156
Likes: 45
From: San Pedro CA
I am digging from memory here... but I think it's 18ftlb.
To be honest, the key here is consistancy.
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:00 PM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane Queensland, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by bogus
I am digging from memory here... but I think it's 18ftlb.
To be honest, the key here is consistancy.
Cheers, yeah I realise consistency is more the point for warpage reasons.
Anyone else have the factory settings?
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:08 PM
Racer
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Benoni Gauteng
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:14 PM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane Queensland, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by SupaVette
they are 25
I thought they may be.
IS that from the GM manual or something else?
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:15 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 83,383
Likes: 87
From: Boston, MA
23 rings a bell for some reason. I just make em' good and snug.
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:17 PM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane Queensland, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorp508
23 rings a bell for some reason. I just make em' good and snug.
Thanks. I'm not really after any bell ringings or memories, just ACTUAL factory specs.
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:20 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 83,383
Likes: 87
From: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by smacko
Thanks. I'm not really after any bell ringings or memories, just ACTUAL factory specs.
Sorry for trying to help. Trust me, you won't **** off any corvette gods by being off a couple ft. lbs.
10 Ugly Corvettes That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:22 PM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane Queensland, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorp508
Sorry for trying to help. Trust me, you won't **** off any corvette gods by being off a couple ft. lbs.
No mate, SORRY - I didn't mean it to sound that way! I DO appreciate your thoughts. I'd just like to know the exact range GM specifies on this and decide for myself the amount of variation.
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:22 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 40,156
Likes: 45
From: San Pedro CA
besides, it's a steel bolt going into aluminum... err on the side of caution.
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:27 PM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane Queensland, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by bogus
besides, it's a steel bolt going into aluminum... err on the side of caution.
EXACTLY my caution; don't want to go any higher than recommended...In fact I'll prob go 1 or 2 pounds lighter
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:35 PM
Le Mans Master
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 65
From: Queensland, AUSTRALIA
so which one is it? 18, 23 or 25 ft/lbs?? Thats a big variation isnt it...
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:38 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 40,156
Likes: 45
From: San Pedro CA
the 18lbs setting is from the Edelbrock kit, to be honest, so they may have different requirements.
Sep 23, 2005 | 09:53 PM
Drifting
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 0
From: GA
Bogus is right...19 ft/lbs, even for the factory pieces. What I do is run them all down till they are snug, then go 1/8 turn more..this is about 15 ft/lbs.
Sep 23, 2005 | 10:27 PM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane Queensland, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casethecorvetteman
so which one is it? 18, 23 or 25 ft/lbs?? Thats a big variation isnt it...
Yeah mate, I thought it was a fairly straight forward question too...
JUST to be MORE precise; My runners are STOCK '85 ones and they're going into STOCK '85 Inlet manifold.
Might take a closer look at the Haynes manual...
Sep 26, 2005 | 08:26 AM
Racer
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Benoni Gauteng
From my gm book for a '90 25ft/lbs
Sep 26, 2005 | 08:41 AM
Le Mans Master
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,214
Likes: 65
From: Queensland, AUSTRALIA
Quote:
Originally Posted by SupaVette
From my gm book for a '90 25ft/lbs
He has an "85" though... BIG difference....
Sep 26, 2005 | 09:07 AM
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane Queensland, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by SupaVette
From my gm book for a '90 25ft/lbs
Thanks, but as 'casethecorvetteman' says; there's a BIG difference between '90 & '85, and I DID state right at the beginning, mine is an '85.
CORRECT GM specs from a CF mate Bob (I forgot his nickname) IS 18.
Sep 26, 2005 | 12:29 PM
Drifting
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,923
Likes: 0
From: GA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casethecorvetteman
He has an "85" though... BIG difference....
No difference. same cast aluminum parts
Sep 26, 2005 | 12:34 PM
Team Owner
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 83,383
Likes: 87
From: Boston, MA
There is absolutely zero difference between 85 and 90 plenum/runners as far as fastening goes. The only difference you'll find is that the intake manifold itself the bolts are at a different angle, the cold start valve does not exist, and there is no rear coolant line. If anything I'd more trust the later #s since '85 was a "first year" engine.