When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I believe the 3157 is a new offering for an LT1 retrofit. I think it is a single roller chain (to fit the thicker LT1 alum. timing cover) with hardened gears and NO waterpump gear.
The hex-adjust won't work on an LT block though because the cam pin needs to be free to spin the Opti, but the hex-adjust sets have the adjuster covering the pin so it won't fit into the optispark.
Yes it will, it protrudes for the adjuster by a few hundred thou. All you need to do is mill/grind a little relief into the pocket for the pin. Works great
Yes it will, it protrudes for the adjuster by a few hundred thou. All you need to do is mill/grind a little relief into the pocket for the pin. Works great
I know it won't work for the 9-3145A double roller hex adjust, unless you also want to mill down the cam gear as well because it pushed the Opti out too far. I just went through this during my last engine build.
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
Originally Posted by sothpaw2
This is what Cloyes told me to use so I hope it works.
It says it requires the use of an electric w/p too, so I don't see what the difference is between it and the 9-3145 which also can't be used w/o an electric w/p. Does the 9-3157 work with a reluctor ring, possibly?
From: Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die
St. Jude Donor '04-'05-'06-'07
Originally Posted by 500hp
I believe the 3157 is a new offering for an LT1 retrofit. I think it is a single roller chain (to fit the thicker LT1 alum. timing cover) with hardened gears and NO waterpump gear.
It's listed under double rollers one place where I looked it up. Since it's listed through '97, it must be compatible w/ the reluctor ring. That must be the difference between it and the 9-3145. Maybe it offers a bit more cover clearance too since a few have had this problem.
I believe the 3157 is a new offering for an LT1 retrofit. I think it is a single roller chain (to fit the thicker LT1 alum. timing cover) with hardened gears and NO waterpump gear.
I got the chain yesterday, and you are correct, it is a single roller chain. But.....this sucker is really THICK.
I'm guessing here, but I believe the 3145 is not shown as a fit for the lt1 is because the early optis required the nose driven shaft. The stock cam gear is splined for this shaft, while the 3145 just has a large hole in the center. The 94/96 optis used the cam pin to drive the optis. I have a 94 with the early style opti and I modded the 3145 by putting a plug into the center hole and splined it. Has run perfectly all summer that way.
the 3157 is actually the same as the GMPP #12371043. that's the identical crank sprocket and chain as the LT4 ED set, with a different cam sprocket. the GMPP part number, though, comes with new cam bolts, retainer bolts, and retainer. it's also a lot cheaper than the 3157 is from summit.
I know it won't work for the 9-3145A double roller hex adjust, unless you also want to mill down the cam gear as well because it pushed the Opti out too far. I just went through this during my last engine build.
hmm?? thats weird. It's in my car and fits fine. Did you take a mill and cut the area in the opti stub around the drive pin boss to half it's original depth? This allows the adjuster room in the opti yet the .200 of pin left sticking out of the end of the adjuster still properly locates and drives the opti. No clearence problems, no protrusion of the opti prior to fastener installation and with the cap off there is no way you could skip the rotor off the pin. strange that it didn't work out for you.
just remember to add/subtract whatever you adjust cam timng to to match your igniton offset in the programming, otherwise your timing will be off.
Last edited by Baldturbofreak; Nov 15, 2005 at 12:47 PM.
i wanted to follow up since what i said above turns out to be incorrect.
the 3157 is the same as the GM #12371043, but with a different crank sprocket. the cloyes crank sprocket is a standard sbc size, and has +4 and -4 keyways in addition to 0.
the sets cloyes makes for GM all have the undersize crank sprocket. this is presumably to allow easier/faster assembly by robots, since the crank sprocket can be fully seated before installing the chain and cam sprocket. with the regular size crank sprocket, often you have to push both sprockets on together since the chain doesn't have enough slack.
the 3157 is actually the same as the GMPP #12371043. that's the identical crank sprocket and chain as the LT4 ED set, with a different cam sprocket. the GMPP part number, though, comes with new cam bolts, retainer bolts, and retainer. it's also a lot cheaper than the 3157 is from summit.
-michael
When I was inquiring about mine the engineer I spoke to mentioned that one, (heavy duty single) as well as telling me they make it for GM.
No, it isn't. I have a $2,000 short block bill to prove it, and that's just the short block work at the machine shop. Shards of metal are not good for a motor.
I measured the ED gear (the cam gear) at only 28 RC in teeth region. That's like 130 ksi tensile strength, which I think is how you get the plate stock from the mill.
All the cloyes crank sprockets are only hardened just below the teeth, and is visible as a 'flame' looking ring under the teeth the rest is not hardened. Thats why I never liked all the additional keyways for timing especially the house shape, can be a place suspect to breaking even if it is softer.
Just curious here southpaw, was the center section intact or was there anything left that was in one piece to determine the week area?
All the cloyes crank sprockets are only hardened just below the teeth, and is visible as a 'flame' looking ring under the teeth the rest is not hardened. Thats why I never liked all the additional keyways for timing especially the house shape, can be a place suspect to breaking even if it is softer.
Just curious here southpaw, was the center section intact or was there anything left that was in one piece to determine the week area?
There was plenty gear tooth (where it meets the waterpump gear--LT1/4 specific design here) left to test. But 80% of the teeth were totally gone. I also bought the similar Cloyes set from summit & got the same result.
You just don't mesh a gear which is 41 RC with a gear that is 28 RC. In contact, the soft gear will wear. In my case, I think had something that acclerated the wear, but I bet that every gear will wear way faster then it should.